Suppr超能文献

肌肉力量是否可预测初次或继发 ACL 损伤?一项前瞻性研究的范围综述。

Is muscular strength a predictor for primary or secondary ACL injury? A scoping review of prospective studies.

机构信息

University of Southern California, Division of Biokinesiology & Physical Therapy, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

University of Southern California, Division of Biokinesiology & Physical Therapy, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Phys Ther Sport. 2023 May;61:91-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2023.03.004. Epub 2023 Mar 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify strength-related risk factors of ACL injury by conducting a scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature.

METHODS

PubMed and EBSCO host (CINAHL Complete, MEDLINE Complete, SPORTDiscus) were searched from inception to August 2022. Prospective studies that examined strength strength-related risk factors for ACL injury (primary and secondary) were included. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guided data charting/extraction.

RESULTS

17 studies were included (eight primary ACL injury, nine secondary ACL injury). Knee flexor strength was the most studied predictor (10 studies), followed by hip abductor strength (9 studies). Across studies, measures of muscle performance were inconsistent. Significant strength-related risk factors were reported in seven of 17 studies. Potential strength-related risk factors of primary ACL injury included measures of hip strength (abductor or external rotator) and knee strength (knee flexor/extensor ratio and knee extensor strength symmetry) for secondary ACL injury. Limited/conflicting evidence was found for all strength-related risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Measures of muscle strength appear to be predictive of primary and secondary ACL injury in a subset of identified studies. The heterogeneity of study designs and lack of standardization related to strength testing make it difficult to determine the overall impact of strength in predicting ACL injury.

摘要

目的

通过对同行评议文献进行范围综述,确定与 ACL 损伤相关的与力量相关的风险因素。

方法

从建库至 2022 年 8 月,在 PubMed 和 EBSCO 主机(CINAHL Complete、MEDLINE Complete、SPORTDiscus)上进行检索。纳入了检查 ACL 损伤(原发性和继发性)与力量相关的风险因素的前瞻性研究。PRISMA 扩展用于范围综述指导数据图表/提取。

结果

纳入了 17 项研究(8 项原发性 ACL 损伤,9 项继发性 ACL 损伤)。膝关节屈肌力量是研究最多的预测因素(10 项研究),其次是髋关节外展肌力量(9 项研究)。在不同的研究中,肌肉表现的测量方法不一致。在 17 项研究中有 7 项报告了与力量相关的显著风险因素。原发性 ACL 损伤的潜在与力量相关的风险因素包括髋关节力量(外展肌或外旋肌)和膝关节力量(膝关节屈肌/伸肌比和膝关节伸肌力量对称性)的测量值。对于所有与力量相关的风险因素,均发现证据有限/相互矛盾。

结论

在确定的一些研究中,肌肉力量的测量值似乎可以预测原发性和继发性 ACL 损伤。研究设计的异质性以及与力量测试相关的缺乏标准化使得难以确定力量在预测 ACL 损伤中的总体影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验