• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长效β2受体激动剂联合短效毒蕈碱拮抗剂对稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的附加治疗效果及安全性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

The efficacy and safety of additional treatment with short-acting muscarinic antagonist combined with long-acting beta-2 agonist in stable patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Tanimura Kazuya, Sato Susumu, Fujita Yukio, Yamamoto Yoshifumi, Hajiro Takashi, Horita Nobuyuki, Kawayama Tomotaka, Muro Shigeo

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, 12967Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Chron Respir Dis. 2023 Jan-Dec;20:14799731231166008. doi: 10.1177/14799731231166008.

DOI:10.1177/14799731231166008
PMID:36967224
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10052583/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The rationale for additional treatment with short-acting bronchodilators combined with long-acting bronchodilators for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is not adequately studied.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a short-acting muscarinic antagonist (SAMA) therapy combined with a long-acting beta-2 agonist (LABA) in patients with stable COPD. Pulmonary function, dyspnea, health-related quality of life, exercise tolerance, physical activity, exacerbations of COPD, and adverse events during regular use were set as outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

We included five controlled trials including two sets of publicly available online data without article publications for the meta-analysis. Additional use of SAMA plus LABA showed a significant improvement in the peak response in FEV (mean difference (MD) 98.70 mL, < .00001), transitional dyspnea index score (MD .85, = .02), and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire score (MD -2.00, = .008) compared to LABA treatment. There was no significant difference in the risk of exacerbation of COPD ( = .20) and only a slight trend of increased severe adverse events (OR: 2.16, = .08) and cardiovascular events (OR: 2.38, = .06).

CONCLUSION

Additional treatment with SAMA combined with LABA could be a feasible choice due to its efficacy and safety.

摘要

背景

对于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者,联用短效支气管扩张剂和长效支气管扩张剂进行额外治疗的基本原理尚未得到充分研究。

方法

我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估短效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(SAMA)疗法联合长效β2受体激动剂(LABA)治疗稳定期COPD患者的疗效和安全性。将肺功能、呼吸困难、健康相关生活质量、运动耐力、身体活动、COPD急性加重以及常规使用期间的不良事件作为感兴趣的结局指标。

结果

我们纳入了五项对照试验,其中包括两组未发表文章但可公开获取的在线数据用于荟萃分析。与LABA治疗相比,额外使用SAMA加LABA在第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV)的峰值反应(平均差(MD)98.70 mL,P<0.00001)、过渡性呼吸困难指数评分(MD 0.85,P = 0.02)和圣乔治呼吸问卷评分(MD -2.00,P = 0.008)方面有显著改善。COPD急性加重风险无显著差异(P = 0.20),严重不良事件(OR:2.16,P = 0.08)和心血管事件(OR:2.38,P = 0.06)仅有轻微增加趋势。

结论

联用SAMA和LABA进行额外治疗因其疗效和安全性可能是一种可行的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0079/10052583/37e206b76ff5/10.1177_14799731231166008-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0079/10052583/1126fa871cb3/10.1177_14799731231166008-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0079/10052583/37e206b76ff5/10.1177_14799731231166008-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0079/10052583/1126fa871cb3/10.1177_14799731231166008-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0079/10052583/37e206b76ff5/10.1177_14799731231166008-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
The efficacy and safety of additional treatment with short-acting muscarinic antagonist combined with long-acting beta-2 agonist in stable patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.长效β2受体激动剂联合短效毒蕈碱拮抗剂对稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的附加治疗效果及安全性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Chron Respir Dis. 2023 Jan-Dec;20:14799731231166008. doi: 10.1177/14799731231166008.
2
Efficacy of Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate Metered Dose Inhaler (BGF MDI) Versus Other Inhaled Corticosteroid/Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist/Long-Acting β-Agonist (ICS/LAMA/LABA) Triple Combinations in COPD: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis.布地奈德/格隆溴铵/富马酸福莫特罗干粉吸入剂(BGF MDI)对比其他吸入性皮质类固醇/长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂/长效β激动剂(ICS/LAMA/LABA)三联复方制剂治疗 COPD 的疗效:系统文献评价和网络荟萃分析。
Adv Ther. 2020 Jun;37(6):2956-2975. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01311-3. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
3
Long-acting beta2-agonist in addition to tiotropium versus either tiotropium or long-acting beta2-agonist alone for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.长效β2受体激动剂联合噻托溴铵与单独使用噻托溴铵或长效β2受体激动剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 22;2015(10):CD008989. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008989.pub3.
4
Once daily long-acting beta2-agonists and long-acting muscarinic antagonists in a combined inhaler versus placebo for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.每日一次长效β2受体激动剂与长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂联合吸入器治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病对比安慰剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 6;3(3):CD012930. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012930.pub2.
5
Dual LABA/LAMA Therapy versus LABA or LAMA Monotherapy for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis in Support of the American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline.LABA/LAMA 联合治疗与 LABA 或 LAMA 单药治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病。支持美国胸科学会临床实践指南的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Sep;17(9):1133-1143. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201912-915OC.
6
A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Dual Bronchodilation With LAMA/LABA for the Treatment of Stable COPD.一项关于长效抗胆碱能药物/长效β2受体激动剂双重支气管扩张治疗稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病的系统评价与荟萃分析
Chest. 2016 May;149(5):1181-96. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.02.646. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
7
Long-acting beta2-agonists versus long-acting muscarinic antagonists in patients with stable COPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.长效β2受体激动剂与长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂用于稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Respirology. 2017 Oct;22(7):1313-1319. doi: 10.1111/resp.13100. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
8
Role of Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist/Long-Acting β-Agonist Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂/长效β受体激动剂疗法在慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的作用
Ann Pharmacother. 2017 Aug;51(8):696-705. doi: 10.1177/1060028017705149. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
9
Triple Therapy versus Dual or Monotherapy with Long-Acting Bronchodilators for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.三联疗法与长效支气管扩张剂双联或单药治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Oct;17(10):1308-1318. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202001-023OC.
10
Long-acting Muscarinic Antagonist Versus Inhaled Corticosteroid when Added to Long-acting β-agonist for COPD: A Meta-analysis.长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂与吸入性糖皮质激素在慢性阻塞性肺疾病中联合长效β受体激动剂使用时的比较:一项荟萃分析。
COPD. 2016 Dec;13(6):677-685. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2016.1170799. Epub 2016 May 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Exercise capacity and physical activity in COPD patients treated with a LAMA/LABA combination: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在接受 LAMA/LABA 联合治疗的 COPD 患者中,运动能力和体力活动:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Respir Res. 2022 Dec 15;23(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-02268-3.
2
Long-acting dual bronchodilator therapy (indacaterol/glycopyrronium) versus nebulized short-acting dual bronchodilator (salbutamol/ipratropium) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.长效双支气管扩张剂治疗(茚达特罗/格隆溴铵)与雾化短效双支气管扩张剂(沙丁胺醇/异丙托溴铵)治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的比较:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Respir Med. 2020 Sep;171:106064. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2020.106064. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
3
Effect of pulmonary rehabilitation with assistive use of short-acting β2 agonist in COPD patients using long-acting bronchodilators.长效支气管扩张剂治疗 COPD 患者时辅助使用短效β2 激动剂的肺康复效果。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2021 Jun;37(6):719-728. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2019.1641866. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
4
Dual bronchodilation with tiotropium/olodaterol further reduces activity-related breathlessness tiotropium alone in COPD.噻托溴铵/奥达特罗双重支气管扩张作用进一步减轻 COPD 患者的活动相关呼吸困难,优于单用噻托溴铵。
Eur Respir J. 2019 Mar 28;53(3). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02049-2018. Print 2019 Mar.
5
Combination of assist use of short-acting beta-2 agonists inhalation and guidance based on patient-specific restrictions in daily behavior: Impact on physical activity of Japanese patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.联合使用短效β-2激动剂吸入并根据患者日常行为的特定限制进行指导:对日本慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者身体活动的影响。
Respir Investig. 2019 Mar;57(2):133-139. doi: 10.1016/j.resinv.2018.12.001. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
6
The dyspnoea-inactivity vicious circle in COPD: development and external validation of a conceptual model.COPD 中的呼吸困难-活动不良循环:概念模型的发展和外部验证。
Eur Respir J. 2018 Sep 15;52(3). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00079-2018. Print 2018 Sep.
7
Efficacy of tiotropium/olodaterol on lung volume, exercise capacity, and physical activity.噻托溴铵/奥达特罗对肺容积、运动能力和身体活动的疗效。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 May 1;13:1407-1419. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S166023. eCollection 2018.
8
Spanish Guidelines for Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (GesEPOC) 2017. Pharmacological Treatment of Stable Phase.《2017年西班牙慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理指南(GesEPOC)。稳定期的药物治疗》
Arch Bronconeumol. 2017 Jun;53(6):324-335. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2017.03.018. Epub 2017 May 3.
9
Tiotropium versus ipratropium bromide for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.噻托溴铵与异丙托溴铵治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 22;2015(9):CD009552. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009552.pub3.
10
Efficacy and safety of umeclidinium plus vilanterol versus tiotropium, vilanterol, or umeclidinium monotherapies over 24 weeks in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from two multicentre, blinded, randomised controlled trials.为期 24 周的乌美溴铵维兰特罗与噻托溴铵、维兰特罗或乌美溴铵单药治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疗效和安全性:两项多中心、盲法、随机对照试验的结果。
Lancet Respir Med. 2014 Jun;2(6):472-86. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70065-7. Epub 2014 May 14.