Suppr超能文献

非药物疗法对痴呆患者认知功能的有效性——随机对照试验的网状Meta分析

Effectiveness of non-pharmacological therapies on cognitive function in patients with dementia-A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Luo Guangxin, Zhang Junqiu, Song Zeyi, Wang Ying, Wang Xiaojing, Qu Haifeng, Wang Fang, Liu Chengjiang, Gao Fujia

机构信息

School of Public Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China.

School of Clinical Medicine, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China.

出版信息

Front Aging Neurosci. 2023 Mar 2;15:1131744. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1131744. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Non-pharmacological therapies (NPTs) have received increasing attention from researchers as a category of treatment to improve cognitive impairment in patients with dementia because of their fewer side effects. In this study, photobiomodulation (PBM), enriched environment (EE), exercise therapy (ET), computerized cognitive training (CCT), and cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) were selected to compare the effects of NPTs that improve dementia by quantifying information from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

We did a systematic review and network meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, Wan Fang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Web of Science, and VIP Database from the time of database creation to 1 August 2022. Two investigators independently screened the literature, extracted information, and assessed the RCTs' quality with the Cochrane Collaboration Network Risk of Bias 2.0. Network meta-analysis was performed using R language (X64 version 4.1.3) and STATA 17.0.

RESULTS

We identified 1,268 citations and of these included 38 trials comprising 3,412 participants. For improving dementia, the results of the network meta-analysis showed that compared with the control group (CON), PBM (SMD = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.43-1.37), EE (SMD = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.02-1.41), ET (SMD = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.16-0.68), and CST (SMD = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.11-0.62) were significantly different ( < 0.05); There was no significant difference in CCT (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI: -0.07-0.88) ( > 0.05). The ranked results showed that PBM has more potential to be the best intervention ( = 0.90). In addition, there was a significant difference between PBM and CST in improving cognitive function (SMD = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.00; 1.08, < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In this study, NPTs have excellent potential to improve cognition in people with dementia, and PBM may have more significant benefits in improving cognition than the other four NPTs.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022363746.

摘要

目的

非药物疗法(NPTs)作为一类用于改善痴呆患者认知障碍的治疗方法,因其副作用较少而受到研究人员越来越多的关注。在本研究中,选择了光生物调节疗法(PBM)、丰富环境疗法(EE)、运动疗法(ET)、计算机化认知训练(CCT)和认知刺激疗法(CST),通过量化随机对照试验(RCTs)的信息来比较NPTs改善痴呆的效果。

方法

我们进行了一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。从数据库创建至2022年8月1日,检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、中国知网数据库、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库、Web of Science和维普数据库。两名研究人员独立筛选文献、提取信息,并使用Cochrane协作网偏倚风险2.0评估RCTs的质量。使用R语言(X64版本4.1.3)和STATA 17.0进行网状Meta分析。

结果

我们识别出1268条引文,其中纳入38项试验,共3412名参与者。对于改善痴呆,网状Meta分析结果显示,与对照组(CON)相比,PBM(标准化均数差[SMD]=0.90,95%置信区间[CI]:0.43 - 1.37)、EE(SMD = 0.71,95% CI:0.02 - 1.41)、ET(SMD = 0.42,95% CI:0.16 - 0.68)和CST(SMD = 0.36,95% CI:0.11 - 0.62)有显著差异(P<0.05);CCT无显著差异(SMD = 0.41,95% CI:-0.07 - 0.88)(P>0.05)。排序结果显示,PBM最有可能是最佳干预措施(概率=0.90)。此外,PBM与CST在改善认知功能方面有显著差异(SMD = 0.54,95% CI:0.00;1.08,P<0.05)。

结论

在本研究中,NPTs在改善痴呆患者认知方面具有良好潜力,且PBM在改善认知方面可能比其他四种NPTs具有更显著的益处。

系统评价注册

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/,标识符CRD42022363746。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00c8/10035791/31081499a334/fnagi-15-1131744-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验