Suppr超能文献

急性肝衰竭和终末期慢性肝病患儿肝移植的长期预后:一项回顾性观察研究。

Long-term outcomes of pediatric liver transplantation in acute liver failure end-stage chronic liver disease: A retrospective observational study.

作者信息

Alnagar Amr M, Hakeem Abdul R, Daradka Khaled, Kyrana Eirini, Methga Marumbo, Palaniswamy Karthikeyan, Rajwal Sanjay, Mulla Jamila, O'meara Moira, Upasani Vivek, Vijayanand Dhakshinamoorthy, Prasad Raj, Attia Magdy S

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21615, Egypt.

Liver and Transplant Surgery, The Leeds Teaching Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.

出版信息

World J Transplant. 2023 Mar 18;13(3):96-106. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v13.i3.96.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Children with acute liver failure (ALF) who meet the criteria are eligible for super-urgent transplantation, whereas children with end-stage chronic liver disease (ESCLD) are usually transplanted electively. Pediatric liver trans plantation (PLT) in ALF and ESCLD settings has been well described in the literature, but there are no studies comparing the outcomes in these two groups.

AIM

To determine if there is a difference in post-operative complications and survival outcomes between ALF and ESCLD in PLT.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study of all primary PLTs performed at a single center between 2000 and 2019. ALF and ESCLD groups were compared for pretransplant recipient, donor and operative parameters, and post-operative outcomes including graft and patient survival.

RESULTS

Over a 20-year study period, 232 primary PLTs were performed at our center; 195 were transplanted for ESCLD and 37 were transplanted for ALF. The ALF recipients were significantly older (median 8 years 5.4 years; = 0.031) and heavier (31 kg 21 kg; = 0.011). Living donor grafts were used more in the ESCLD group (34 0; = 0.006). There was no difference between the two groups concerning vascular complications and rejection, but there were more bile leaks in the ESCLD group. Post-transplant patient survival was significantly higher in the ESCLD group: 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 97.9%, 93.9%, and 89.4%, respectively, compared to 78.3%, 78.3%, and 78.3% in the ALF group ( = 0.007). However, there was no difference in 1-, 5-, and 10-year graft survival between the ESCLD and ALF groups (90.7%, 82.9%, 77.3% 75.6%, 72.4%, and 66.9%; = 0.119).

CONCLUSION

Patient survival is inferior in ALF compared to ESCLD recipients; the main reason is death in the 1 year post-PLT in ALF group. Once the ALF children overcome the 1 year after transplant, their survival stabilizes, and they have good long-term outcomes.

摘要

背景

符合标准的急性肝衰竭(ALF)患儿有资格接受超紧急肝移植,而终末期慢性肝病(ESCLD)患儿通常接受择期肝移植。ALF和ESCLD背景下的小儿肝移植(PLT)在文献中已有详细描述,但尚无研究比较这两组的预后情况。

目的

确定PLT中ALF和ESCLD在术后并发症和生存结局方面是否存在差异。

方法

这是一项对2000年至2019年在单一中心进行的所有原发性PLT的回顾性观察研究。比较ALF组和ESCLD组的移植前受者、供者和手术参数,以及包括移植物和患者生存情况在内的术后结局。

结果

在20年的研究期间,我们中心共进行了232例原发性PLT;195例为ESCLD患者接受移植,37例为ALF患者接受移植。ALF受者年龄显著更大(中位年龄8岁对5.4岁;P = 0.031)且体重更重(31 kg对21 kg;P = 0.011)。ESCLD组更多使用活体供肝移植物(34例对0例;P = 0.006)。两组在血管并发症和排斥反应方面无差异,但ESCLD组胆汁漏更多。ESCLD组移植后患者生存率显著更高:1年、5年和10年生存率分别为97.9%、93.9%和89.4%,而ALF组分别为78.3%、78.3%和78.3%(P = 0.007)。然而,ESCLD组和ALF组在1年、5年和10年移植物生存率方面无差异(90.7%、82.9%、77.3%对75.6%、72.4%和66.9%;P = 0.119)。

结论

与ESCLD受者相比,ALF患者的生存率较低;主要原因是ALF组在PLT后1年内死亡。一旦ALF患儿度过移植后1年,其生存率趋于稳定,且长期预后良好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fd9/10037232/d4abddbaa985/WJT-13-96-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验