Suppr超能文献

胰管镜引导下的电液压碎石术治疗梗阻性胰管结石的长期疗效

Long-term outcomes of pancreatoscopy-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy for the treatment of obstructive pancreatic duct stones.

作者信息

de Rijk Florence E M, Stassen Pauline M C, van der Wiel Sophia E, Boermeester Marja A, Issa Yama, Kempeneers Marinus A, Verdonk Robert C, Bruno Marco J, de Jonge Pieter Jan F

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Research and Development, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2023 Mar 24;11(3):E296-E304. doi: 10.1055/a-2035-8969. eCollection 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Pancreatoscopy-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) has proven to be an effective first-line therapy in symptomatic chronic pancreatitis (CP) patients with obstructing pancreatic duct (PD) stones 1 . However, long-term outcomes of endoscopic EHL remain unknown. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term treatment effects of EHL as first-line therapy and to compare with those obtained in a historical cohort of patients who underwent extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) as primary treatment. An observational retrospective single-center long-term follow-up study was performed including 19 consecutive patients who previously underwent endoscopic EHL compared to 18 patients who underwent ESWL followed by endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP). The primary endpoint was long-term treatment success after EHL or ESWL defined as no recurrence of symptomatic intraductal stones confirmed on imaging. Secondary endpoints for the EHL-population included long-term clinical success (i. e., a similar or lower Izbicki Pain Score or reduction in opiate usage as compared to 6-month follow-up), quality of life (QoL), pancreatic function and hospital re-admission rate. In the EHL group, 37 % of the patients developed recurrent symptomatic PD stones versus 61 % in the ESWL group after a median follow-up of 35.0 and 76.5 months. Of the patients with recurrence, 71 % versus 100 % underwent a reintervention. Median time to recurrence was 12.0 versus 13.0 months. Clinical success sustained in 58 % of the EHL patients. QoL was not significantly different compared with 6-month follow-up and baseline. Also at long-term follow-up, endoscopic EHL as first-line treatment is moderately effective for symptomatic CP patients with treatment success rates that seems at least equally effective as ESWL.

摘要

胰管镜引导下的电液压碎石术(EHL)已被证明是治疗有症状的慢性胰腺炎(CP)且伴有阻塞性胰管(PD)结石患者的一种有效的一线治疗方法。然而,内镜下EHL的长期疗效仍不明确。本研究的目的是评估EHL作为一线治疗的长期疗效,并与一组接受体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)作为主要治疗方法的历史队列患者的疗效进行比较。进行了一项观察性回顾性单中心长期随访研究,纳入了19例先前接受内镜下EHL的连续患者,并与18例接受ESWL后行内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERP)的患者进行对比。主要终点是EHL或ESWL后的长期治疗成功,定义为影像学检查未证实有症状的导管内结石复发。EHL组的次要终点包括长期临床成功(即与6个月随访相比,Izbicki疼痛评分相似或更低,或阿片类药物使用减少)、生活质量(QoL)、胰腺功能和医院再入院率。在EHL组中,中位随访35.0个月和76.5个月后,37%的患者出现复发性有症状的PD结石,而ESWL组为61%。在复发患者中,71%与100%接受了再次干预。复发的中位时间为12.0个月与13.0个月。58%的EHL患者维持了临床成功。与6个月随访和基线相比,QoL无显著差异。同样在长期随访中,内镜下EHL作为一线治疗对有症状的CP患者具有中等疗效,治疗成功率似乎至少与ESWL一样有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f65/10038745/b0ca94873f15/10-1055-a-2035-8969-i2887ei1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验