Suppr超能文献

学校中针对自闭症儿童的社交技能干预的基于实践的模式与基于研究的模式比较。

Comparing a Practice-Based Model with a Research-Based Model of social skills interventions for children with autism in schools.

作者信息

Locke Jill, Rotheram-Fuller Erin, Harker Colleen, Kasari Connie, Mandell David S

机构信息

University of Washington, United States.

Arizona State University, United States.

出版信息

Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2019 Jun;62:10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Social impairment is the most challenging core deficit for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Several evidence-based interventions address social impairment in children with ASD; however, adoption, use, and implementation of these interventions in schools is challenging.

METHOD

Ninety-two children with ASD who received one of three intervention models: a) School personnel adapted and implemented evidence-based social skills intervention (Practice-Based Model; n = 14); b) University researcher developed and implemented evidence-based social skills intervention (Research-Based Model; n = 45); or c) standard educational practices model (Inclusion Only Model; n = 33) participated. The average age was 8.4 ( = 1.6) years; majority was male (88%) and white (52.2%). Typically developing classmates completed sociometric ratings to determine children's social network inclusion, and independent raters observed children on the playground using a time-interval behavior coding system to record solitary engagement and frequency of initiations.

RESULTS

Separate linear regression models were conducted. Children in the Research-Based Model had significantly higher social network inclusion than children in the other two settings (p = .05). Children in the Practice-Based Model had significantly lower solitary engagement (p = .04) and more initiations on the playground than children in the University Developed Model (p = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that researchers: 1) may learn from public school stakeholders who have lived experiences to better understand the context in which implementation occurs; and 2) should partner with schools to learn about their processes of adaptation and adoption in order to facilitate successful implementation of evidence-based practices for children with ASD. Interventions designed with implementation in mind may be more feasible and increase the chances of use in schools.

摘要

背景

社交障碍是自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童最具挑战性的核心缺陷。有几种循证干预措施可解决ASD儿童的社交障碍问题;然而,在学校采用、使用和实施这些干预措施具有挑战性。

方法

92名接受以下三种干预模式之一的ASD儿童参与了研究:a)学校工作人员调整并实施循证社交技能干预(基于实践的模式;n = 14);b)大学研究人员开发并实施循证社交技能干预(基于研究的模式;n = 45);或c)标准教育实践模式(仅融合模式;n = 33)。平均年龄为8.4(= 1.6)岁;大多数为男性(88%),白人(52.2%)。发育正常的同班同学完成社会测量评定,以确定儿童的社交网络融入情况,独立评分者使用时间间隔行为编码系统在操场观察儿童,记录孤独行为和发起互动的频率。

结果

进行了单独的线性回归模型分析。基于研究的模式中的儿童比其他两种模式中的儿童具有显著更高的社交网络融入度(p = .05)。基于实践的模式中的儿童在操场上的孤独行为显著更少(p = .04),且发起互动比大学开发模式中的儿童更多(p = .04)。

结论

结果表明,研究人员:1)可以向有实际经验的公立学校利益相关者学习,以更好地了解实施干预的背景;2)应与学校合作,了解其适应和采用过程,以促进为ASD儿童成功实施循证实践。在设计干预措施时考虑到实施可能会更可行,并增加在学校使用的机会。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验