Suppr超能文献

无前庭病变个体视频头脉冲试验中影响前庭眼反射增益变异性的因素:文献系统综述

Factors affecting variability in vestibulo-ocular reflex gain in the Video Head Impulse Test in individuals without vestibulopathy: A systematic review of literature.

作者信息

Money-Nolan Laurel Elise, Flagge Ashley Gaal

机构信息

Vestibular and Balance Lab, Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, United States.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2023 Mar 9;14:1125951. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1125951. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize and synthesize published evidence examining variations in vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain outcomes for the Video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) in healthy individuals without vestibulopathy in order to describe factors that may influence test outcomes.

METHODS

Computerized literature searches were performed from four search engines. The studies were selected based on relevant inclusion and exclusion criteria, and were required to examine VOR gain in healthy adults without vestibulopathy. The studies were screened using Covidence (Cochrane tool) and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement standards (PRISMA-2020).

RESULTS

A total of 404 studies were initially retrieved, of which a total of 32 studies met inclusion criteria. Four major categories were identified which lead to significant variation in VOR gain outcomes: participant-based factors, tester/examiner-based factors, protocol-based factors, and equipment-based factors.

DISCUSSION

Various subcategories are identified within each of these classifications and are discussed, including recommendations for decreasing VOR gain variability in clinical practice.

摘要

引言

本系统评价的目的是总结和综合已发表的证据,这些证据研究了在没有前庭病变的健康个体中视频头脉冲试验(vHIT)的前庭眼反射(VOR)增益结果的差异,以便描述可能影响测试结果的因素。

方法

通过四个搜索引擎进行计算机化文献检索。根据相关的纳入和排除标准选择研究,并要求研究检测没有前庭病变的健康成年人的VOR增益。使用Covidence(Cochrane工具)对研究进行筛选,并遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目声明标准(PRISMA-2020)。

结果

最初检索到404项研究,其中共有32项研究符合纳入标准。确定了导致VOR增益结果显著差异的四大类因素:基于参与者的因素、基于测试者/检查者的因素、基于方案的因素和基于设备的因素。

讨论

在这些分类中的每一类中都确定了各种子类别并进行了讨论,包括在临床实践中降低VOR增益变异性的建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f360/10034038/dd7449d1d92b/fneur-14-1125951-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验