Michels Frederick, Vereecke Evie, Matricali Giovanni
Orthopaedic Department AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium.
MIFAS by GRECMIP (Minimally Invasive Foot and Ankle Society), Merignac, France.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Mar 10;11:1047134. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1047134. eCollection 2023.
Subtalar instability (STI) is a disabling complication after an acute lateral ankle sprain and remains a challenging problem. The pathophysiology is difficult to understand. Especially the relative contribution of the intrinsic subtalar ligaments in the stability of the subtalar joint is still controversial. Diagnosis is difficult because of the overlapping clinical signs with talocrural instability and the absence of a reliable diagnostic reference test. This often results in misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment. Recent research offers new insights in the pathophysiology of subtalar instability and the importance of the intrinsic subtalar ligaments. Recent publications clarify the local anatomical and biomechanical characteristics of the subtalar ligaments. The cervical ligament and interosseous talocalcaneal ligament seem to play an important function in the normal kinematics and stability of the subtalar joint. In addition to the calcaneofibular ligament (CFL), these ligaments seem to have an important role in the pathomechanics of subtalar instability (STI). These new insights have an impact on the approach to STI in clinical practice. Diagnosis of STI can be performed be performed by a step-by-step approach to raise the suspicion to STI. This approach consists of clinical signs, abnormalities of the subtalar ligaments on MRI and intraoperative evaluation. Surgical treatment should address all the aspects of the instability and focus on a restoration of the normal anatomical and biomechanical properties. Besides a low threshold to reconstruct the CFL, a reconstruction of the subtalar ligaments should be considered in complex cases of instability. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive update of the current literature focused on the contribution of the different ligaments in the stability of the subtalar joint. This review aims to introduce the more recent findings in the earlier hypotheses on normal kinesiology, pathophysiology and relation with talocrural instability. The consequences of this improved understanding of pathophysiology on patient identification, treatment and future research are described.
距下关节不稳(STI)是急性外侧踝关节扭伤后一种致残性并发症,仍然是一个具有挑战性的问题。其病理生理学难以理解。尤其是距下关节固有韧带在距下关节稳定性中的相对作用仍存在争议。由于与踝关节不稳有重叠的临床体征且缺乏可靠的诊断参考检查,诊断较为困难。这常常导致误诊和不恰当的治疗。最近的研究为距下关节不稳的病理生理学以及距下关节固有韧带的重要性提供了新的见解。最近的出版物阐明了距下韧带的局部解剖和生物力学特征。颈韧带和距跟骨间韧带似乎在距下关节的正常运动学和稳定性中发挥重要作用。除了跟腓韧带(CFL)外,这些韧带似乎在距下关节不稳(STI)的病理力学中也起重要作用。这些新见解对临床实践中STI的处理方法产生影响。STI的诊断可通过逐步方法进行,以提高对STI的怀疑。该方法包括临床体征、MRI上距下韧带的异常以及术中评估。手术治疗应解决不稳的所有方面,并专注于恢复正常的解剖和生物力学特性。除了重建CFL的低门槛外,在复杂的不稳病例中应考虑重建距下韧带。本综述的目的是全面更新当前文献,重点关注不同韧带在距下关节稳定性中的作用。本综述旨在介绍在正常运动学、病理生理学以及与踝关节不稳关系的早期假说中更新的发现。描述了对病理生理学理解的改善对患者识别、治疗和未来研究的影响。