Alvarez Enrique, Nair Kavita V, Tan Hiangkiat, Rathi Kapil, Gabler Nicole B, Maiese Eric M, Deshpande Chinmay, Shao Qiujun
Rocky Mountain Multiple Sclerosis Center, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
HealthCore, Inc, Wilmington, DE, USA.
J Med Econ. 2023 Jan-Dec;26(1):494-502. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2194185.
Evaluate the real-world costs over two years and costs by site of care for ocrelizumab (OCR), natalizumab (NTZ), and alemtuzumab (ATZ) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).
This retrospective study used HealthCore Integrated Research Database and included continuously enrolled adults with MS initiating OCR, NTZ, and ATZ between April 2017 and July 2019 (i.e. patient identification period). Annual total cost of care (pharmacy and medical costs) was evaluated for the first- and second-year of follow-up, further stratified by site of care. Costs were measured using health plan allowed amount and adjusted to 2019 US dollars. Sensitivity analyses were conducted in patients who completed yearly dosing schedule according to Food and Drug Administration approved prescribing information.
Overall, 1,058, 166, and 46 patients were included in OCR, NTZ, and ATZ cohorts, respectively. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) total cost of care during first- and second-year follow-up were $125,597 ($72,274) and $109,618 ($75,085) for OCR, $117,033 ($57,102) and $106,626 ($54,872) for NTZ, and $179,809 ($97,530) and $108,636 ($77,973) for ATZ. Infusible drug cost was the main driver in all three cohorts accounting for >78% of the total costs. Annual total cost of care increased substantially after patients started/switched to infusible DMTs. Across site of care, hospital outpatient infusion was common (OCR 58%, NTZ 37%, ATZ 49%) and expensive followed by physician office infusion (OCR 28%, NTZ 40%, ATZ 16%); home infusion was the least common (<10%) and least expensive.
The results were limited to commercially insured patients (specifically those with Anthem-affiliated health plans).
Real-world costs increased after patients started/switched to infusible DMTs. Drug cost is the main driver for the total costs, which varied substantially by site of care. Controlling drug cost markups and using home setting for infusion can reduce costs in the treatment of MS patients.
评估多发性硬化症(MS)患者使用奥瑞珠单抗(OCR)、那他珠单抗(NTZ)和阿仑单抗(ATZ)两年的实际费用以及不同治疗地点的费用。
这项回顾性研究使用了HealthCore综合研究数据库,纳入了2017年4月至2019年7月期间(即患者识别期)持续登记的开始使用OCR、NTZ和ATZ的成年MS患者。在随访的第一年和第二年评估年度总护理费用(药房和医疗费用),并进一步按治疗地点分层。费用使用健康计划允许金额进行测量,并调整为2019年美元。对根据美国食品药品监督管理局批准的处方信息完成年度给药方案的患者进行敏感性分析。
总体而言,OCR、NTZ和ATZ队列分别纳入了1058例、166例和46例患者。OCR在第一年和第二年随访期间的平均(标准差[SD])总护理费用分别为125,597美元(72,274美元)和109,618美元(75,085美元),NTZ为117,033美元(57,102美元)和106,626美元(54,872美元),ATZ为179,809美元(97,530美元)和108,636美元(77,973美元)。注射用药物成本是所有三个队列中的主要驱动因素,占总成本的比例超过78%。患者开始/改用注射用疾病修正治疗药物(DMTs)后,年度总护理费用大幅增加。在不同治疗地点中,医院门诊输液很常见(OCR为58%,NTZ为37%,ATZ为49%)且费用高昂,其次是医生办公室输液(OCR为28%,NTZ为40%,ATZ为16%);家庭输液最不常见(<10%)且费用最低。
结果仅限于商业保险患者(特别是那些拥有与Anthem相关的健康计划的患者)。
患者开始/改用注射用DMTs后,实际费用增加。药物成本是总成本的主要驱动因素,不同治疗地点的成本差异很大。控制药物成本加价并采用家庭输液可以降低MS患者的治疗成本。