Suppr超能文献

近期骨折部位对骨折风险的重要性——一项回顾性、全国性瑞典老年男女队列研究。

The Importance of Recent Prevalent Fracture Site for Imminent Risk of Fracture - A Retrospective, Nationwide Cohort Study of Older Swedish Men and Women.

机构信息

Sahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Region Västra Götaland, Närhälsan Norrmalm Health Centre, Skövde, Sweden.

出版信息

J Bone Miner Res. 2023 Jun;38(6):851-859. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4806. Epub 2023 Apr 24.

Abstract

There is limited evidence regarding which fracture types carry the highest risk for subsequent fracture. The aim of this study was to investigate how the risk of imminent fracture depends on index fracture site. This nationwide retrospective cohort study utilized national registers in Sweden to determine the risk of fracture according to recent (≤2 years) index fracture site and according to an old (>2 years) prevalent fracture compared with the risk observed in controls without a fracture. All Swedes 50 years or older between 2007 and 2010 were included in the study. Patients with a recent fracture were designated a specific fracture group depending on the type of previous fracture. Recent fractures were classified as major osteoporotic fracture (MOF), including fractured hip, vertebra, proximal humerus, and wrist, or non-MOF. Patients were followed until December 31, 2017, censored for death and emigration, and the risk of any fracture and hip fracture was assessed. A total of 3,423,320 persons were included in the study, 70,254 with a recent MOF, 75,526 with a recent non-MOF, 293,051 with an old fracture, and 2,984,489 persons with no previous fracture. The median time of follow-up for the four groups was 6.1 (interquartile range [IQR] 3.0-8.8), 7.2 (5.6-9.4), 7.1 (5.8-9.2), and 8.1 years (7.4-9.7), respectively. Patients with a recent MOF, recent non-MOF, and old fracture had a substantially increased risk of any fracture (hazard ratio [HR] adjusted for age and sex 2.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.08-2.14; HR 2.24, 95% CI 2.21-2.27; and HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.76-1.78, respectively) compared with controls. All recent fractures, MOFs, and non-MOFs, as well as older fractures, increase the risk of subsequent fracture, suggesting that all recent fractures should be included in fracture liaison services and that case-finding strategies for those with older fractures may be warranted to prevent subsequent fractures. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

摘要

关于哪些骨折类型具有最高的后续骨折风险,证据有限。本研究的目的是调查根据最近(≤2 年)的索引骨折部位以及与无骨折的对照相比,旧(>2 年)流行骨折的索引骨折部位如何影响骨折的风险。本研究使用瑞典的全国性登记处,纳入了 2007 年至 2010 年间所有 50 岁及以上的瑞典人,以确定最近(≤2 年)的索引骨折部位和较旧(>2 年)的常见骨折与对照组相比,骨折风险如何。无骨折的患者被归类为特定骨折组,具体取决于以前骨折的类型。最近的骨折被归类为主要骨质疏松性骨折(MOF),包括髋部、椎体、肱骨近端和腕部骨折,或非-MOF。患者被随访至 2017 年 12 月 31 日,以死亡和移民为截止点,评估任何骨折和髋部骨折的风险。共有 3423320 人纳入研究,其中 70254 人有近期 MOF,75526 人有近期非-MOF,293051 人有陈旧性骨折,2984489 人无既往骨折。四组的中位随访时间分别为 6.1(四分位距 [IQR] 3.0-8.8)、7.2(5.6-9.4)、7.1(5.8-9.2)和 8.1 年(7.4-9.7)。与对照组相比,近期 MOF、近期非-MOF 和陈旧性骨折患者的任何骨折风险显著增加(年龄和性别调整后的危险比 [HR] 2.11,95%置信区间 [CI] 2.08-2.14;HR 2.24,95% CI 2.21-2.27;和 HR 1.77,95% CI 1.76-1.78)。所有近期骨折、MOF 和非-MOF 以及较旧骨折都会增加随后骨折的风险,这表明所有近期骨折都应纳入骨折联络服务,并且对于较旧骨折,可能需要进行病例发现策略,以预防随后骨折。 © 2023 作者。由 Wiley 期刊公司代表美国骨矿研究协会(ASBMR)出版的《骨与矿物研究杂志》。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验