Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, The Netherlands.
Department of Internal Medicine, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J Bone Miner Res. 2022 Oct;37(10):2025-2032. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4674. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
Fracture liaison services (FLS) are considered to be the most effective organizational approach for secondary fracture prevention. In this study, we evaluated whether FLS care was associated with reduced subsequent fracture and mortality risk over 3 years of follow-up. In total, 8682 consecutive patients aged 50-90 years with a recent fracture were included. Before FLS introduction, regular fracture treatment procedures were followed (pre-FLS). After FLS introduction, patients were invited to the FLS and FLS attenders were assessed for osteoporosis, prevalent vertebral fractures, metabolic bone disorders, medication use, and fall risk, and treatment for fracture prevention was initiated according to Dutch guidelines. All fractures were radiographically confirmed and categorized into major/hip (pelvis, proximal humerus or tibia, vertebral, multiple rib, distal femur) and non-major/non-hip (all other fractures). Mortality risk was examined using age and sex adjusted Cox proportional hazard models. For subsequent fracture risk, Cox proportional hazard models were adjusted for age, sex, and competing mortality risk (subdistribution hazard [SHR] approach). The pre-FLS group consisted of 2530 patients (72% women), of whom 1188 (46.9%) had major/hip index fractures, the post-FLS group consisted of 6152 patients (69% women), of whom 2973 (48.3%) had major/hip index fractures. In patients with a non-major/non-hip fracture there was no difference in subsequent non-major/non-hip fracture risk or mortality between pre-FLS and post-FLS. In patients with a major/hip index fracture, mortality risk was lower post-FLS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.96) and subsequent major/hip fracture risk was lower in the first 360 days after index fracture post-FLS compared to pre-FLS (SHR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52-0.87). In conclusion, FLS care was associated with a lower mortality risk in the first 3 years and a lower subsequent major/hip fracture risk in the first year in patients with a major/hip index fracture but not in patients with a non-major/non-hip fracture. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
骨折联络服务(FLS)被认为是预防继发性骨折最有效的组织方法。在这项研究中,我们评估了 FLS 护理是否与 3 年随访期间随后发生的骨折和死亡风险降低相关。共有 8682 名年龄在 50-90 岁之间、近期有骨折的连续患者入组。在 FLS 引入之前,遵循常规的骨折治疗程序(FLS 前)。在 FLS 引入后,邀请患者到 FLS,评估 FLS 就诊者是否患有骨质疏松症、现有椎体骨折、代谢性骨疾病、用药情况和跌倒风险,并根据荷兰指南启动骨折预防治疗。所有骨折均经放射学证实,并分为主要/髋部(骨盆、近端肱骨或胫骨、椎体、多发性肋骨、股骨远端)和非主要/非髋部(所有其他骨折)。使用年龄和性别调整的 Cox 比例风险模型检查死亡风险。对于随后的骨折风险,Cox 比例风险模型调整了年龄、性别和竞争死亡风险(亚分布风险[SHR]方法)。在 FLS 前组中,有 2530 名患者(72%为女性),其中 1188 名(46.9%)患有主要/髋部指数骨折,在 FLS 后组中,有 6152 名患者(69%为女性),其中 2973 名(48.3%)患有主要/髋部指数骨折。在非主要/非髋部骨折患者中,FLS 前组和 FLS 后组之间随后发生的非主要/非髋部骨折风险或死亡率没有差异。在主要/髋部指数骨折患者中,FLS 后组的死亡率较低(风险比[HR]0.84;95%置信区间[CI],0.73-0.96),与 FLS 前组相比,在指数骨折后 360 天内,随后发生的主要/髋部骨折风险也较低(SHR0.67;95%CI,0.52-0.87)。总之,FLS 护理与主要/髋部指数骨折患者在第 1 年内的死亡率降低以及第 1 年内随后发生的主要/髋部骨折风险降低相关,但与非主要/非髋部骨折患者无关。