• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胎儿医学基金会用于西班牙人群中孕龄小于胎龄新生儿中期预测的竞争风险模型的外部验证

External validation of Fetal Medicine Foundation competing-risks model for midgestation prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates in Spanish population.

作者信息

Albaiges G, Papastefanou I, Rodriguez I, Prats P, Echevarria M, Rodriguez M A, Rodriguez Melcon A

机构信息

Fetal Medicine Unit, Obstetrics Service, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital Quirón Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain.

Fetal Medicine Research Institute, King's College Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Aug;62(2):202-208. doi: 10.1002/uog.26210.

DOI:10.1002/uog.26210
PMID:36971008
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the external validity of the new Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) competing-risks model for prediction in midgestation of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonates.

METHODS

This was a single-center prospective cohort study of 25 484 women with a singleton pregnancy undergoing routine ultrasound examination at 19 + 0 to 23 + 6 weeks' gestation. The FMF competing-risks model for the prediction of SGA combining maternal factors and midgestation estimated fetal weight by ultrasound scan (EFW) and uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) was used to calculate risks for different cut-offs of birth-weight percentile and gestational age at delivery. The predictive performance was evaluated in terms of discrimination and calibration.

RESULTS

The validation cohort was significantly different in composition compared with the FMF cohort in which the model was developed. In the validation cohort, at a 10% false-positive rate (FPR), maternal factors, EFW and UtA-PI yielded detection rates of 69.6%, 38.7% and 31.7% for SGA < 10 percentile with delivery at < 32, < 37 and ≥ 37 weeks' gestation, respectively. The respective values for SGA < 3 percentile were 75.7%, 48.2% and 38.1%. Detection rates in the validation cohort were similar to those reported in the FMF study for SGA with delivery at < 32 weeks but lower for SGA with delivery at < 37 and ≥ 37 weeks. Predictive performance in the validation cohort was similar to that reported in a subgroup of the FMF cohort consisting of nulliparous and Caucasian women. Detection rates in the validation cohort at a 15% FPR were 77.4%, 50.0% and 41.5% for SGA < 10 percentile with delivery at < 32, < 37 and ≥ 37 weeks, respectively, which were similar to the respective values reported in the FMF study at a 10% FPR. The model had satisfactory calibration.

CONCLUSION

The new competing-risks model for midgestation prediction of SGA developed by the FMF performs well in a large independent Spanish population. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

摘要

目的

检验胎儿医学基金会(FMF)新的竞争风险模型在预测小于胎龄(SGA)新生儿中期妊娠情况时的外部有效性。

方法

这是一项单中心前瞻性队列研究,纳入了25484名单胎妊娠女性,她们在妊娠19+0至23+6周时接受常规超声检查。使用FMF竞争风险模型预测SGA,该模型结合了母体因素、超声扫描估计的胎儿体重(EFW)和子宫动脉搏动指数(UtA-PI),用于计算不同出生体重百分位数和分娩孕周临界值的风险。从区分度和校准度方面评估预测性能。

结果

与开发该模型的FMF队列相比,验证队列在组成上有显著差异。在验证队列中,在10%假阳性率(FPR)时,对于孕周<32周、<37周和≥37周分娩的SGA<第10百分位数,母体因素、EFW和UtA-PI的检出率分别为69.6%、38.7%和31.7%。对于SGA<第3百分位数,相应的值分别为75.7%、48.2%和38.1%。验证队列中对于孕周<32周分娩的SGA的检出率与FMF研究报告的相似,但对于孕周<37周和≥37周分娩的SGA的检出率较低。验证队列中的预测性能与FMF队列中由未生育和白种女性组成的亚组报告的相似。在15%FPR时,验证队列中对于孕周<32周、<37周和≥37周分娩的SGA<第10百分位数的检出率分别为77.4%、50.0%和41.5%,与FMF研究在10%FPR时报告的相应值相似。该模型具有良好的校准度。

结论

FMF开发的用于SGA中期妊娠预测的新竞争风险模型在一个大型独立的西班牙人群中表现良好。©2023国际妇产科超声学会。

相似文献

1
External validation of Fetal Medicine Foundation competing-risks model for midgestation prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates in Spanish population.胎儿医学基金会用于西班牙人群中孕龄小于胎龄新生儿中期预测的竞争风险模型的外部验证
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Aug;62(2):202-208. doi: 10.1002/uog.26210.
2
Validation of Fetal Medicine Foundation competing-risks model for small-for-gestational-age neonate in early third trimester.验证胎儿医学基金会竞争风险模型在孕晚期早期的小于胎龄儿。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Apr;63(4):466-471. doi: 10.1002/uog.27498.
3
Evaluation of screening performance of first-trimester competing-risks prediction model for small-for-gestational age in Asian population.评估亚洲人群中小胎儿生长受限的妊娠早期竞争风险预测模型的筛查性能。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar;63(3):331-341. doi: 10.1002/uog.27447. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
4
Second-trimester contingent screening for small-for-gestational-age neonate.孕中期对小于胎龄儿的临机筛查。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Feb;59(2):177-184. doi: 10.1002/uog.23730. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
5
Competing-risks model for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate at 36 weeks' gestation.36 孕周小胎龄儿预测的竞争风险模型。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Nov;60(5):612-619. doi: 10.1002/uog.26057. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
6
Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates.32 周与 36 周常规超声检查:预测小于胎龄儿。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;53(6):761-768. doi: 10.1002/uog.20258. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
7
Competing-risks model for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate from biophysical and biochemical markers at 11-13 weeks' gestation.11-13 孕周时生物物理和生化标志物预测小于胎龄儿的竞争风险模型。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;57(1):52-61. doi: 10.1002/uog.23523. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
8
Competing-risks model for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate from estimated fetal weight at 19-24 weeks' gestation.19-24 孕周估计胎儿体重预测小于胎龄儿的竞争风险模型。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun;57(6):917-924. doi: 10.1002/uog.23593. Epub 2021 May 5.
9
Two-stage approach for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate and adverse perinatal outcome by routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation.在 35-37 孕周的常规超声检查中预测小于胎龄儿和不良围产结局的两阶段方法。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;54(4):484-491. doi: 10.1002/uog.20391. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
10
Comparison of competing-risks model with angiogenic factors in midgestation screening for preterm growth-related neonatal morbidity.竞争风险模型与血管生成因子在孕中期筛查早产相关新生儿发病率中的比较
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 May;63(5):613-618. doi: 10.1002/uog.27559.

引用本文的文献

1
External validation and comparison of Fetal Medicine Foundation competing-risks model for small-for-gestational-age neonate in the first trimester: multicenter cohort study.孕早期小于胎龄儿的胎儿医学基金会竞争风险模型的外部验证与比较:多中心队列研究
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Apr 14. doi: 10.1002/uog.29219.