• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚和新西兰 2017 年至 2022 年的皮肤科学术研究:一项横断面文献计量学分析。

Academic dermatology in Australia and New Zealand between 2017 and 2022: A cross-sectional bibliometric analysis.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.

Laboratory of Translational Cutaneous Medicine, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Australas J Dermatol. 2023 May;64(2):213-220. doi: 10.1111/ajd.14025. Epub 2023 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1111/ajd.14025
PMID:36971373
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Academic dermatologists in Australia and New Zealand provide high-quality and meaningful contributions to the understanding of disease and therapeutic translational research. Concerns have been raised by the Australian Medical Association regarding the decline of clinical academics in Australia as a whole, however, such trends in scholarly output have not previously been analysed for Australasian dermatologists.

METHODS

A bibliometric analysis of dermatologists in Australia and New Zealand was conducted in January and February 2023. Available Scopus profiles for all dermatologists were used to measure lifetime H index, scholarly output, citation counts and field-weighted citation impact (FWCI) in the last 5 years (2017-2022). Trends in output over time were measured using non-parametric tests. Differences in output between subgroups stratified by gender and academic leadership positions (associate professor or professor) were measured using Wilcoxon rank-sum and one-way ANOVA tests. The scholarly output of recent College graduates was also analysed as a subgroup, comparing the same bibliographic variables in the 5 years preceding and 5 years following awarding of their fellowships.

RESULTS

From the 463 practising dermatologists in Australia and New Zealand, 372 (80%) were successfully matched to Scopus researcher profiles. Of these dermatologists, 167 were male (45%) and 205 (55%) were female, and 31 (8%) held academic leadership positions. Most dermatologists (67%) published at least one paper in the last 5 years. The median lifetime H index was 4, and between 2017 and 2022 median scholarly output was 3, the median citations were 14 and the median FWCI was 0.64. There was a non-significant trend towards fewer publications per year, however, citation count and FWCI decreased significantly. By subgroups, female dermatologists published significantly more papers between 2017 and 2022, and other bibliographic variables were comparable to male dermatologists. However, women were underrepresented in positions of academic leadership-comprising only 32% of this cohort despite representing 55% of dermatologists. Professors were also significantly more likely to have higher bibliographic outcomes than associate professors. Finally, analysis of recent College graduates highlighted a significant decline in bibliometric outcomes pre- and post-fellowship.

CONCLUSION

Overall, our analysis identifies a trend towards decreased research output by dermatologists in Australia and New Zealand in the last 5 years. Strategies to support dermatologists in research endeavours, particularly women and recent graduates, will be essential in maintaining strong scholarly output among Australasian dermatologists and thereby sustaining optimal evidence-based patient care.

摘要

简介

澳大利亚和新西兰的皮肤科学术专家在疾病的理解和治疗转化研究方面做出了高质量且有意义的贡献。然而,澳大利亚医学协会对澳大利亚临床学术人员的减少表示担忧,但目前尚未对澳大拉西亚皮肤科医生的学术成果趋势进行分析。

方法

我们于 2023 年 1 月至 2 月对澳大利亚和新西兰的皮肤科医生进行了文献计量分析。使用 Scopus 中所有皮肤科医生的可用资料,测量了终身 H 指数、过去 5 年(2017-2022 年)的学术产出、引文计数和领域加权引文影响(FWCI)。使用非参数检验测量随时间推移的输出趋势。使用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验和单因素方差分析检验按性别和学术领导职位(副教授或教授)分层的亚组之间的输出差异。还分析了最近学院毕业生的学术成果,比较了他们获得研究员资格前后 5 年的相同文献计量变量。

结果

在澳大利亚和新西兰的 463 名执业皮肤科医生中,有 372 名(80%)成功匹配到 Scopus 研究人员资料。这些皮肤科医生中,167 名是男性(45%),205 名是女性(55%),31 名(8%)担任学术领导职务。大多数皮肤科医生(67%)在过去 5 年内至少发表了一篇论文。终身 H 指数中位数为 4,2017 年至 2022 年期间,学术产出中位数为 3,引文中位数为 14,FWCI 中位数为 0.64。每年发表的论文数量呈下降趋势,但引文数量和 FWCI 显著下降。按亚组分析,女性皮肤科医生在 2017 年至 2022 年期间发表的论文明显更多,其他文献计量变量与男性皮肤科医生相当。然而,女性在学术领导职位上的代表性不足——尽管她们占皮肤科医生的 55%,但只占这一群体的 32%。教授的文献计量结果也明显高于副教授。最后,对最近学院毕业生的分析强调了在获得研究员资格前后,文献计量结果明显下降。

结论

总的来说,我们的分析表明,过去 5 年来,澳大利亚和新西兰皮肤科医生的研究产出呈下降趋势。支持皮肤科医生从事研究工作的策略,特别是支持女性和最近的毕业生,对于维持澳大拉西亚皮肤科医生的强劲学术成果并维持最佳循证患者护理至关重要。

相似文献

1
Academic dermatology in Australia and New Zealand between 2017 and 2022: A cross-sectional bibliometric analysis.澳大利亚和新西兰 2017 年至 2022 年的皮肤科学术研究:一项横断面文献计量学分析。
Australas J Dermatol. 2023 May;64(2):213-220. doi: 10.1111/ajd.14025. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
2
Scholarly productivity of united states academic cardiothoracic anesthesiologists: influence of fellowship accreditation and transesophageal echocardiographic credentials on h-index and other citation bibliometrics.美国心胸麻醉学专业学术人员的学术成果:研究型专科学院认证和经食管超声心动图证书对 h 指数和其他引文计量学的影响。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011 Oct;25(5):761-5. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.03.003. Epub 2011 May 4.
3
Relationship Between Scholarly Activity and Postgraduate Career Choice: A Bibliometric Analysis of the 2017 Diplomates of the American Board of Dermatology.学术活动与研究生职业选择之间的关系:2017 年美国皮肤病学会院士的文献计量分析。
J Grad Med Educ. 2020 Aug;12(4):455-460. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00651.1.
4
Measuring Scholastic Production by Dermatopathologists Using the H-Index: A Cross-Sectional Study.使用H指数衡量皮肤病理学家的学术产出:一项横断面研究。
Am J Dermatopathol. 2018 Jun;40(6):416-418. doi: 10.1097/DAD.0000000000001030.
5
h-Index and Academic Rank by Gender Among Breast Surgery Fellowship Faculty.乳腺外科研究员的 h 指数和按性别划分的学术排名。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 Jan;31(1):110-116. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8579. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
6
Academic Radiology in the United States: Defining Gender Disparities in Faculty Leadership and Academic Rank.美国学术放射学:界定教员领导力和学术职级中的性别差异。
Acad Radiol. 2022 May;29(5):714-725. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.05.016. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
7
Gender Differences in Scholarly Productivity Within Academic Gynecologic Oncology Departments.学术性妇科肿瘤学部门内学术产出的性别差异。
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;126(6):1279-1284. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001133.
8
On Track to Professorship? A Bibliometric Analysis of Early Scholarly Output.有望成为教授?早期学术成果的文献计量分析。
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016 Mar-Apr;45(3):E119-23.
9
Evaluating the research productivity of academic dermatologists based on the NIH-supported relative citation ratio.基于 NIH 支持的相对引文比评估学术皮肤科医生的研究生产力。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 Jul;315(5):1435-1438. doi: 10.1007/s00403-022-02485-2. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
10
A gender-based comparison of promotion and research productivity in academic dermatology.皮肤科学术领域中基于性别的晋升与研究产出比较。
Dermatol Online J. 2016 Apr 18;22(4):13030/qt1hx610pf.