Suppr超能文献

学龄前儿童在所有权推理方面取得进展的初步证据。

Preliminary evidence for progressions in ownership reasoning over the preschool period.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba.

Department of Psychology, University of Michigan.

出版信息

Dev Psychol. 2023 Jun;59(6):1116-1125. doi: 10.1037/dev0001531. Epub 2023 Mar 27.

Abstract

Defining developmental progressions can be an important step in identifying developmental precursors and mechanisms of change, within and across areas of reasoning. In one exploratory study, we examine whether the development of children's thinking about ownership follows a systematic progression wherein some components emerge reliably before others. We examine this issue in a sample of 72 children: 40 older 2-year-olds, = 2.78 (.14); = 2.50-3.00, and 32 older 4-year-olds, = 4.77 (.16); = 4.50-5.00, living in Michigan in the United States. We use a battery of four established ownership tasks that tested different aspects of children's ownership thinking. A Guttman test revealed a reliable sequence that explained 81.9% of children's performance. Namely, we discovered that identifying familiar owned objects emerged first, control of permission as a cue to ownership second, understanding ownership transfers third, and the tracking of sets of identical objects last. This ordering suggests two foundational ownership abilities on which more complex reasoning may be built: the ability to include information about familiar owners in children's mental models of objects and recognizing that control is central to ownership. The observed progression is an important first step toward developing a formal ownership scale. This study paves the way for mapping the conceptual and information-processing demands (e.g., executive functioning, memory) that likely underlie change in ownership thinking across childhood. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

定义发展进程可以是识别发展前体和变化机制的重要步骤,这些前体和机制存在于推理的各个领域内和领域之间。在一项探索性研究中,我们研究了儿童对所有权的思考是否遵循系统的发展过程,即某些组成部分是否可靠地先于其他组成部分出现。我们在一个由 72 名儿童组成的样本中研究了这个问题:40 名年龄较大的 2 岁儿童,M = 2.78(.14);M = 2.50-3.00,32 名年龄较大的 4 岁儿童,M = 4.77(.16);M = 4.50-5.00,他们居住在美国密歇根州。我们使用了一套四个已建立的所有权任务,这些任务测试了儿童所有权思维的不同方面。一个古特曼测试揭示了一个可靠的序列,解释了 81.9%的儿童表现。具体来说,我们发现识别熟悉的拥有物品首先出现,控制许可作为所有权的线索其次出现,理解所有权转移第三出现,而跟踪一组相同的物品最后出现。这种排序表明,有两种基础性的所有权能力可能是建立更复杂推理的基础:将关于熟悉所有者的信息纳入儿童对物体的心理模型的能力,以及认识到控制是所有权的核心。所观察到的发展是朝着制定正式所有权量表迈出的重要第一步。这项研究为绘制概念和信息处理需求(例如,执行功能、记忆)奠定了基础,这些需求可能是儿童整个童年时期所有权思维变化的基础。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

7
Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.儿童的问题:一种认知发展机制。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2007;72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00412.x.

本文引用的文献

4
Exploring the first possessor bias in children.探究儿童的首位拥有者偏见。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 17;14(1):e0209422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209422. eCollection 2019.
5
Ownership Matters: People Possess a Naïve Theory of Ownership.所有权很重要:人们拥有一种朴素的所有权理论。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Feb;23(2):102-113. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.11.008. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
10

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验