Institute for Human Movement Studies, HU University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Human Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 27;18(3):e0280607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280607. eCollection 2023.
Negative pain-related cognitions are associated with persistence of low-back pain (LBP), but the mechanism underlying this association is not well understood. We propose that negative pain-related cognitions determine how threatening a motor task will be perceived, which in turn will affect how lumbar movements are performed, possibly with negative long-term effects on pain.
To assess the effect of postural threat on lumbar movement patterns in people with and without LBP, and to investigate whether this effect is associated with task-specific pain-related cognitions.
30 back-healthy participants and 30 participants with LBP performed consecutive two trials of a seated repetitive reaching movement (45 times). During the first trial participants were threatened with mechanical perturbations, during the second trial participants were informed that the trial would be unperturbed. Movement patterns were characterized by temporal variability (CyclSD), local dynamic stability (LDE) and spatial variability (meanSD) of the relative lumbar Euler angles. Pain-related cognition was assessed with the task-specific 'Expected Back Strain'-scale (EBS). A three-way mixed Manova was used to assess the effect of Threat, Group (LBP vs control) and EBS (above vs below median) on lumbar movement patterns.
We found a main effect of threat on lumbar movement patterns. In the threat-condition, participants showed increased variability (MeanSDflexion-extension, p<0.000, η2 = 0.26; CyclSD, p = 0.003, η2 = 0.14) and decreased stability (LDE, p = 0.004, η2 = 0.14), indicating large effects of postural threat.
Postural threat increased variability and decreased stability of lumbar movements, regardless of group or EBS. These results suggest that perceived postural threat may underlie changes in motor behavior in patients with LBP. Since LBP is likely to impose such a threat, this could be a driver of changes in motor behavior in patients with LBP, as also supported by the higher spatial variability in the group with LBP and higher EBS in the reference condition.
负性疼痛认知与下腰痛(LBP)的持续存在有关,但这种关联的机制尚不清楚。我们提出,负性疼痛认知决定了一个运动任务将被感知为多么具有威胁性,这反过来又会影响腰椎运动的执行方式,可能对疼痛产生长期的负面影响。
评估姿势威胁对有和无 LBP 的个体腰椎运动模式的影响,并研究这种影响是否与特定任务的疼痛认知有关。
30 名背部健康的参与者和 30 名患有 LBP 的参与者连续完成两次坐姿重复伸展运动(45 次)。在第一次试验中,参与者受到机械干扰的威胁,在第二次试验中,参与者被告知试验不会受到干扰。运动模式的特征是通过相对腰椎欧拉角的时间变异性(CyclSD)、局部动态稳定性(LDE)和空间变异性(meanSD)来描述。疼痛认知通过特定任务的“预期背部紧张”-量表(EBS)进行评估。使用三因素混合 Manova 来评估威胁、组(LBP 与对照组)和 EBS(高于或低于中位数)对腰椎运动模式的影响。
我们发现威胁对腰椎运动模式有主要影响。在威胁条件下,参与者表现出更大的变异性(MeanSDflexion-extension,p<0.000,η2 = 0.26;CyclSD,p = 0.003,η2 = 0.14)和稳定性降低(LDE,p = 0.004,η2 = 0.14),表明姿势威胁的影响很大。
姿势威胁增加了腰椎运动的变异性和稳定性降低,无论组别或 EBS 如何。这些结果表明,感知到的姿势威胁可能是 LBP 患者运动行为变化的基础。由于 LBP 很可能会造成这种威胁,这可能是 LBP 患者运动行为变化的驱动因素,这也得到了 LBP 组更高的空间变异性和参考条件下更高的 EBS 的支持。