HU University of Applied Sciences, Institute for Human Movement Studies, Postbus 12011, 3501 AA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, 1081 BT Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
HU University of Applied Sciences, Institute for Human Movement Studies, Postbus 12011, 3501 AA Utrecht, the Netherlands.
J Biomech. 2021 May 24;121:110435. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110435. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
Literature highlights the need for research on changes in lumbar movement patterns, as potential mechanisms underlying the persistence of low-back pain. Variability and local dynamic stability are frequently used to characterize movement patterns. In view of a lack of information on reliability of these measures, we determined their within- and between-session reliability in repeated seated reaching. Thirty-six participants (21 healthy, 15 LBP) executed three trials of repeated seated reaching on two days. An optical motion capture system recorded positions of cluster markers, located on the spinous processes of S1 and T8. Movement patterns were characterized by the spatial variability (meanSD) of the lumbar Euler angles: flexion-extension, lateral bending, axial rotation, temporal variability (CyclSD) and local dynamic stability (LDE). Reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), coefficients of variation (CV) and Bland-Altman plots. Sufficient reliability was defined as an ICC ≥ 0.5 and a CV < 20%. To determine the effect of number of repetitions on reliability, analyses were performed for the first 10, 20, 30, and 40 repetitions of each time series. MeanSD, CyclSD, and the LDE had moderate within-session reliability; meanSD: ICC = 0.60-0.73 (CV = 14-17%); CyclSD: ICC = 0.68 (CV = 17%); LDE: ICC = 0.62 (CV = 5%). Between-session reliability was somewhat lower; meanSD: ICC = 0.44-0.73 (CV = 17-19%); CyclSD: ICC = 0.45-0.56 (CV = 19-22%); LDE: ICC = 0.25-0.54 (CV = 5-6%). MeanSD, CyclSD and the LDE are sufficiently reliable to assess lumbar movement patterns in single-session experiments, and at best sufficiently reliable in multi-session experiments. Within-session, a plateau in reliability appears to be reached at 40 repetitions for meanSD (flexion-extension), meanSD (axial-rotation) and CyclSD.
文献强调了研究腰椎运动模式变化的必要性,因为这些变化可能是腰痛持续存在的潜在机制。变异性和局部动态稳定性通常用于描述运动模式。鉴于这些测量方法的可靠性信息不足,我们在重复坐姿伸展试验中确定了它们的内和间测试可靠性。36 名参与者(21 名健康,15 名腰痛)在两天内进行了三次重复坐姿伸展试验。光学运动捕捉系统记录了位于 S1 和 T8 棘突的簇标记的位置。通过腰椎欧拉角的空间变异性(均值±标准差)来描述运动模式:屈伸、侧屈、轴向旋转、时间变异性(CyclSD)和局部动态稳定性(LDE)。使用组内相关系数(ICC)、变异系数(CV)和 Bland-Altman 图评估可靠性。将 ICC≥0.5 和 CV<20%定义为可靠性充足。为了确定重复次数对可靠性的影响,对每个时间序列的前 10、20、30 和 40 次重复进行了分析。均值±标准差、CyclSD 和 LDE 具有中等的内测试可靠性;均值±标准差:ICC=0.60-0.73(CV=14-17%);CyclSD:ICC=0.68(CV=17%);LDE:ICC=0.62(CV=5%)。间测试可靠性略低;均值±标准差:ICC=0.44-0.73(CV=17-19%);CyclSD:ICC=0.45-0.56(CV=19-22%);LDE:ICC=0.25-0.54(CV=5-6%)。均值±标准差、CyclSD 和 LDE 在单次试验中评估腰椎运动模式具有足够的可靠性,在多次试验中最好具有足够的可靠性。在内部测试中,对于均值±标准差(屈伸)、均值±标准差(轴向旋转)和 CyclSD,可靠性似乎在第 40 次重复时达到平台。