• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定行前路腰椎间融合术患者的物理功能和疼痛的最小临床重要差异阈值。

Establishing Minimum Clinically Important Difference Thresholds for Physical Function and Pain in Patients Undergoing Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2023 Jul;175:e352-e360. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.03.087. Epub 2023 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2023.03.087
PMID:36972902
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To establish minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) for the physical function patient-reported outcome measures, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), 12-Item Short Form (SF-12) physical component score (PCS), Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) PCS, and pain patient-reported outcome measures visual analog scale (VAS) back and VAS leg through anchor- and distribution-based calculations.

METHODS

Patients undergoing ALIF with preoperative and 6-month Oswestry Disability Index were included. Using Oswestry Disability Index as the anchor, anchor-based calculation methods were the average change, minimum detectable change, and receiver operating characteristic curve methods. Distribution-based methods were the standard error of measurement, reliable change index, effect size, and half of the standard deviation (0.5ΔSD).

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients were identified. Anchor-based methods ranged from 2.9 to 11.5 for PROMIS-PF, 8.2-13.6 for SF-12 PCS, 7.8-16.8 for VR-12 PCS, 0.5-3.9 for VAS back, and 1.0-3.4 for VAS leg. The area under curve ranged from 0.59 (VAS back) to 0.78 (VR-12 PCS). Distribution-based methods ranged from 1.0 to 4.2 for PROMIS-PF, 1.8-12.2 for SF-12 PCS, 1.9-6.2 for VR-12 PCS, 0.4-1.6 for VAS back, and 0.5-1.7 for VAS leg.

CONCLUSIONS

The MCID values greatly relied on the calculation method. The minimum detectable change method was selected as the most appropriate MCID calculation method. The MCID values that may be utilized for ALIF patients are 7.3 for PROMIS-PF, 8.2 for SF-12 PCS, 7.8 for VR-12 PCS, 3.2 for VAS back, and 2.2 for VAS leg.

摘要

目的

通过锚定和分布基础计算,确定用于前腰椎体间融合术(ALIF)的物理功能患者报告结局测量指标,患者报告结局测量信息系统物理功能(PROMIS-PF)、12 项简短形式(SF-12)物理成分评分(PCS)、退伍军人 RAND 12(VR-12)PCS 和疼痛患者报告结局测量视觉模拟量表(VAS)背部和 VAS 腿部的最小临床重要差异(MCID)。

方法

纳入接受 ALIF 治疗且术前和 6 个月时 Oswestry 残疾指数的患者。以 Oswestry 残疾指数为锚,锚定计算方法包括平均变化、最小可检测变化和受试者工作特征曲线方法。分布基础方法包括测量误差标准、可靠变化指数、效应大小和标准差的一半(0.5ΔSD)。

结果

确定了 51 名患者。基于锚定的方法,PROMIS-PF 为 2.9-11.5,SF-12 PCS 为 8.2-13.6,VR-12 PCS 为 7.8-16.8,VAS 背部为 0.5-3.9,VAS 腿部为 1.0-3.4。曲线下面积范围从 0.59(VAS 背部)到 0.78(VR-12 PCS)。基于分布的方法,PROMIS-PF 为 1.0-4.2,SF-12 PCS 为 1.8-12.2,VR-12 PCS 为 1.9-6.2,VAS 背部为 0.4-1.6,VAS 腿部为 0.5-1.7。

结论

MCID 值很大程度上取决于计算方法。最小可检测变化方法被选为最合适的 MCID 计算方法。可用于 ALIF 患者的 MCID 值为 PROMIS-PF 为 7.3,SF-12 PCS 为 8.2,VR-12 PCS 为 7.8,VAS 背部为 3.2,VAS 腿部为 2.2。

相似文献

1
Establishing Minimum Clinically Important Difference Thresholds for Physical Function and Pain in Patients Undergoing Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.确定行前路腰椎间融合术患者的物理功能和疼痛的最小临床重要差异阈值。
World Neurosurg. 2023 Jul;175:e352-e360. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.03.087. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
2
Establishing minimum clinically important difference for patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing lateral lumbar interbody fusion.建立接受侧路腰椎间融合术患者的患者报告结局测量的最小临床重要差异。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Feb;165(2):325-334. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05428-y. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
3
Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.接受微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术患者的最小临床重要差异
Neurosurgery. 2023 Jun 1;92(6):1199-1207. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002350. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
4
Effect of baseline veterans RAND-12 physical composite score on postoperative patient-reported outcome measures following lateral lumbar interbody fusion.基线退伍军人 RAND-12 物理综合评分对腰椎侧路椎间融合术后患者报告的结局测量的影响。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Nov;165(11):3531-3537. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05763-8. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
5
Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.测定融合延伸治疗相邻节段病变后疼痛、残疾和生活质量的最小临床重要差异。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Jan;16(1):61-7. doi: 10.3171/2011.8.SPINE1194. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
6
The influence of preoperative Veterans RAND-12 physical composite score in patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion [Retrospective Review].术前退伍军人 RAND-12 身体综合评分对接受前路腰椎间融合术患者的影响 [回顾性研究]。
J Clin Neurosci. 2024 May;123:36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.03.017. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
7
Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症后评估疼痛、残疾和健康状况的最小临床重要差异的效用。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 May;14(5):598-604. doi: 10.3171/2010.12.SPINE10472. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
8
Recovery ratios and minimum clinically important difference for clinical outcomes in workers' compensation recipients undergoing MIS-TLIF versus ALIF.接受微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)与经前路腰椎间融合术(ALIF)治疗的工人赔偿接受者的临床结局的恢复率和最小临床重要差异。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Feb;165(2):315-323. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05468-4. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
9
Influence of Preoperative 12-Item Short Form Mental Composite Score on Clinical Outcomes in an Isthmic Spondylolisthesis Population Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.术前 12 项简短心理综合评分对微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗峡部裂性腰椎滑脱患者临床结局的影响。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Feb;158:e1022-e1030. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.026. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
10
Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?腰椎手术后1年的手术效果指标能否准确预测2年的预后?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Dec;25(6):689-696. doi: 10.3171/2015.8.SPINE15476. Epub 2016 Jan 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of elective spine surgery in Canada for degenerative conditions on patient reported health-related quality of life outcomes.加拿大针对退行性疾病的择期脊柱手术对患者报告的健康相关生活质量结果的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 31;15(1):19143. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03613-4.
2
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures in Spine Surgery.脊柱手术中患者报告的结局指标
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2025 May 17. doi: 10.1007/s12178-025-09981-8.
3
Responsiveness of the P4, Patient Specific Functional Scale 2.0, Satisfaction and Recovery Index, and SF-12 in Patients With Musculoskeletal Disorders.
P4、患者特定功能量表2.0、满意度与恢复指数以及SF-12在肌肉骨骼疾病患者中的反应性。
Cureus. 2024 Oct 15;16(10):e71571. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71571. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
Lumbar Disc Replacement Versus Interbody Fusion: Meta-analysis of Complications and Clinical Outcomes.腰椎间盘置换术与椎间融合术:并发症及临床结果的荟萃分析
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2024 Apr 30;16:116900. doi: 10.52965/001c.116900. eCollection 2024.