• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Inpatient Understanding of Their Care Team and Receipt of Mixed Messages: a Two-Site Cross-Sectional Study.住院患者对其医护团队的理解和接受混合信息的情况:一项两地点横断面研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Sep;38(12):2703-2709. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08178-4. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
2
3
Analysis of Patient Handoff Between Providers at a Tertiary Urban Medical Center.三级城市医疗中心医护人员间患者交接情况分析
Kans J Med. 2021 Aug 4;14(2):192-196. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol1415170. eCollection 2021.
4
The AMBER care bundle for hospital inpatients with uncertain recovery nearing the end of life: the ImproveCare feasibility cluster RCT.AMBER 关怀包用于生命末期临近、康复情况不确定的住院患者:改善关怀可行性群组 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(55):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta23550.
5
Factors Associated With Inpatient Subspecialty Consultation Patterns Among Pediatric Hospitalists.儿科医院医师中与住院患者专科会诊模式相关的因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e232648. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.2648.
6
Education Research: Physician identification and patient satisfaction on an academic neurology inpatient service.教育研究:在学术神经内科住院服务中医生的识别和患者满意度。
Neurology. 2018 Feb 13;90(7):e632-e636. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004961. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
7
Re: Letter to the Editor: Inpatient Understanding of Their Care Team and Receipt of Mixed Messages: A Two-Site Cross-Sectional Study.回复:致编辑的信:住院患者对其护理团队的理解以及收到的混合信息:一项双地点横断面研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Aug;39(10):1944. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08603-8. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
8
Letter to the Editor: Inpatient Understanding of Their Care Team and Receipt of Mixed Messages: A Two-Site Cross-Sectional Study.致编辑的信:住院患者对其护理团队的理解以及收到的混合信息:一项双地点横断面研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Aug;39(10):1943. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08600-x. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Interprofessional collaborative care characteristics and the occurrence of bedside interprofessional rounds: a cross-sectional analysis.跨专业协作护理特征与床边跨专业查房的发生情况:一项横断面分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 1;16(1):459. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1714-x.

引用本文的文献

1
'They Were Talking to Each Other but Not to Me': Examining the Drivers of Patients' Poor Experiences During the Transition From the Hospital to Skilled Nursing Facility.“他们彼此交谈却不与我交流”:探究患者从医院转至专业护理机构期间体验不佳的驱动因素
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70248. doi: 10.1111/hex.70248.
2
Inpatients' understanding of the hospitalist role and common medical terminology.住院患者对住院医师角色及常见医学术语的理解。
J Hosp Med. 2025 Jan;20(1):51-55. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13492. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
3
Implementation of the REFLECT Communication Curriculum for Clinical Oncology Graduate Medical Education.实施 REFLECT 沟通课程,用于临床肿瘤学研究生医学教育。
J Palliat Med. 2024 Feb;27(2):231-235. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0316.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimizing Communication with Consultants.优化与顾问的沟通。
Pediatr Rev. 2020 Oct;41(10):551-553. doi: 10.1542/pir.2019-0272.
2
Health Literacy and Shared Decision-making: Exploring the Relationship to Enable Meaningful Patient Engagement in Healthcare.健康素养与共享决策:探索建立关系,以实现医疗保健中具有意义的患者参与。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Feb;36(2):521-524. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05912-0. Epub 2020 May 29.
3
Modernizing Rounds.现代化查房
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Jun 19;168(12):903-904. doi: 10.7326/L18-0144.
4
A concordance-based study to assess doctors' and nurses' mental models in Internal Medicine.一项基于一致性的研究,以评估内科医生和护士的心智模式。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 8;12(8):e0182608. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182608. eCollection 2017.
5
Improving health literacy in community populations: a review of progress.提高社区人群的健康素养:进展综述
Health Promot Int. 2018 Oct 1;33(5):901-911. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dax015.
6
All Together Now: Impact of a Regionalization and Bedside Rounding Initiative on the Efficiency and Inclusiveness of Clinical Rounds.现在齐心协力:区域化和床边查房倡议对临床查房效率和包容性的影响。
J Hosp Med. 2017 Mar;12(3):150-156. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2696.
7
Development and Implementation of a Health Literacy Training Program for Medical Residents.面向住院医师的健康素养培训项目的开发与实施
Med Educ Online. 2006 Dec;11(1):4612. doi: 10.3402/meo.v11i.4612.
8
How does patient-provider communication influence adherence to asthma medications?医患沟通如何影响哮喘药物的依从性?
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Apr;100(4):696-702. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.11.022. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
9
A web-based and mobile patient-centered ''microblog'' messaging platform to improve care team communication in acute care.一个基于网络和移动设备的、以患者为中心的“微博”消息传递平台,用于改善急性护理中的医护团队沟通。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e178-e184. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw110.
10
Do interdisciplinary rounds improve patient outcomes? only if they improve teamwork.跨学科查房能改善患者预后吗?只有在其改善团队协作的情况下才行。
J Hosp Med. 2016 Jul;11(7):524-5. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2587. Epub 2016 Apr 6.

住院患者对其医护团队的理解和接受混合信息的情况:一项两地点横断面研究。

Inpatient Understanding of Their Care Team and Receipt of Mixed Messages: a Two-Site Cross-Sectional Study.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Sep;38(12):2703-2709. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08178-4. Epub 2023 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-023-08178-4
PMID:36973573
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10042424/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient understanding of their care, supported by physician involvement and consistent communication, is key to positive health outcomes. However, patient and care team characteristics can hinder this understanding.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess inpatients' understanding of their care and their perceived receipt of mixed messages, as well as the associated patient, care team, and hospitalization characteristics.

DESIGN

We administered a 30-item survey to inpatients between February 2020 and November 2021 and incorporated other hospitalization data from patients' health records.

PARTICIPANTS

Randomly selected inpatients at two urban academic hospitals in the USA who were (1) admitted to general medicine services and (2) on or past the third day of their hospitalization.

MAIN MEASURES

Outcome measures include (1) knowledge of main doctor and (2) frequency of mixed messages. Potential predictors included mean notes per day, number of consultants involved in the patient's care, number of unit transfers, number of attending physicians, length of stay, age, sex, insurance type, and primary race.

KEY RESULTS

A total of 172 patients participated in our survey. Most patients were unaware of their main doctor, an issue related to more daily interactions with care team members. Twenty-three percent of patients reported receiving mixed messages at least sometimes, most often between doctors on the primary team and consulting doctors. However, the likelihood of receiving mixed messages decreased with more daily interactions with care team members.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients were often unaware of their main doctor, and almost a quarter perceived receiving mixed messages about their care. Future research should examine patients' understanding of different aspects of their care, and the nature of interactions that might improve clarity around who's in charge while simultaneously reducing the receipt of mixed messages.

摘要

背景

患者对自身护理的理解,辅以医生的参与和持续的沟通,是取得积极健康结果的关键。然而,患者和护理团队的特征可能会阻碍这种理解。

目的

我们旨在评估住院患者对自身护理的理解程度和他们对混合信息的感知程度,以及相关的患者、护理团队和住院特征。

设计

我们在 2020 年 2 月至 2021 年 11 月期间向美国两家城市学术医院的住院患者发放了一份包含 30 个项目的调查问卷,并结合了患者健康记录中的其他住院数据。

参与者

随机选择在美国两家城市学术医院接受普通内科服务且(1)住院时间在 3 天或以上的住院患者。

主要措施

结局指标包括(1)对主治医生的了解程度和(2)混合信息的频率。潜在预测因素包括平均每日记录数量、参与患者护理的顾问数量、单位转移次数、主治医生数量、住院时间、年龄、性别、保险类型和主要种族。

主要结果

共有 172 名患者参与了我们的调查。大多数患者不知道他们的主治医生,这与他们与护理团队成员的日常互动更多有关。23%的患者报告至少有时收到混合信息,最常见于主治医生和顾问医生之间。然而,随着与护理团队成员的日常互动增加,收到混合信息的可能性降低。

结论

患者经常不知道他们的主治医生,几乎有四分之一的患者认为他们收到了关于护理的混合信息。未来的研究应该检查患者对自身护理不同方面的理解程度,以及可能提高谁负责的清晰度并同时减少混合信息接收的互动性质。