Suppr超能文献

在前瞻性非干预性AWARE研究中,静脉注射戈利木单抗联合或不联合甲氨蝶呤治疗类风湿关节炎患者的有效性和安全性。

Effectiveness and safety of intravenous golimumab with and without concomitant methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the prospective, noninterventional AWARE study.

作者信息

Broadwell Aaron, Schechtman Joy, Conaway Douglas, Kivitz Alan, Shiff Natalie J, Black Shawn, Xu Stephen, Langholff Wayne, Schwartzman Sergio, Curtis Jeffrey R

机构信息

Rheumatology and Osteoporosis Specialists, 820 Jordan Street, Suite 201, Shreveport, LA, 71101, USA.

SunValley Arthritis Center, Peoria, AZ, USA.

出版信息

BMC Rheumatol. 2023 Mar 27;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s41927-023-00329-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biologic therapies are often prescribed for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have inadequate responses to or are intolerant of methotrexate (MTX) and patients with poor prognostic indicators. This post hoc analysis evaluated effectiveness and safety of intravenous golimumab + MTX vs golimumab without MTX in RA patients.

METHODS

AWARE, a real-world, prospective and pragmatic, Phase 4 study, compared effectiveness and safety of golimumab and infliximab in biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced patients. All treatment decisions were at the discretion of the treating rheumatologist. Effectiveness was evaluated by mean change in CDAI scores at Months 6 and 12. Safety was monitored through approximately 1 year.

RESULTS

Among 685 golimumab-treated patients, 420 (61%) received concomitant MTX during the study and 265 (39%) did not receive MTX after enrollment; 63% and 72%, respectively, discontinued the study. Relative to golimumab without MTX, golimumab + MTX patients had shorter mean disease duration (8.7 vs 10.0 years) and a lower proportion received prior biologics (60% vs 72%); mean ± standard deviation (SD) baseline CDAI scores were similar (30.8 ± 15.1 and 32.6 ± 15.4). Mean ± SD changes from baseline in CDAI scores at Months 6 and 12, respectively, were similar with golimumab + MTX (- 10.2 ± 14.2 and - 10.8 ± 13.8) and golimumab without MTX (- 9.6 ± 12.9 and - 9.9 ± 13.1). The incidence of adverse events/100 patient-years (PY) (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 155.6 (145.6, 166.1) for golimumab + MTX and 191.2 (176.2, 207.1) for golimumab without MTX; infections were the most common type. The incidence of infusion reactions/100PY (95% CI) was 2.1 (1.1, 3.6) for golimumab + MTX versus 5.1 (2.9, 8.3) for golimumab without MTX; none were considered serious. For golimumab + MTX versus golimumab without MTX, rates/100PY (95% CI) of serious infections, opportunistic infections, and malignancies were 2.6 (1.5, 4.3) versus 7.0 (4.4, 10.6), 0.9 (0.3, 2.0) versus 2.6 (1.1, 5.0), and 3.0 (1.7, 4.7) versus 1.0 (0.2, 2.8), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Mean change in CDAI score in the  golimumab without MTX group was generally similar to that of the golimumab + MTX group through 1 year, regardless of prior biologic therapy. Adverse events were consistent with the known IV golimumab safety profile. These results provide real world evidential data that may assist healthcare providers and patients with RA in making informed treatment decisions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov NCT02728934 05/04/2016.

摘要

背景

对于对甲氨蝶呤(MTX)反应不足或不耐受的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者以及预后指标较差的患者,通常会开具生物疗法。这项事后分析评估了静脉注射戈利木单抗联合MTX与单纯使用戈利木单抗治疗RA患者的有效性和安全性。

方法

AWARE是一项真实世界、前瞻性、实用性的4期研究,比较了戈利木单抗和英夫利昔单抗在未使用过生物制剂和有生物制剂使用经验的患者中的有效性和安全性。所有治疗决策均由主治风湿病学家自行决定。通过第6个月和第12个月时CDAI评分的平均变化来评估有效性。安全性监测约1年。

结果

在685例接受戈利木单抗治疗的患者中,420例(61%)在研究期间接受了MTX联合治疗,265例(39%)在入组后未接受MTX治疗;分别有63%和72%的患者中断了研究。与未使用MTX的戈利木单抗相比,联合MTX的戈利木单抗患者的平均病程较短(8.7年对10.0年),接受过先前生物制剂治疗的比例较低(60%对72%);平均±标准差(SD)基线CDAI评分相似(30.8±15.1和32.6±15.4)。第6个月和第12个月时,联合MTX的戈利木单抗组(-10.2±14.2和-10.8±13.8)和未使用MTX的戈利木单抗组(-9.6±12.9和-9.9±13.1)从基线开始的CDAI评分平均±SD变化相似。不良事件/100患者年(PY)(95%置信区间[CI])的发生率,联合MTX的戈利木单抗组为155.6(145.6,166.1),未使用MTX的戈利木单抗组为191.2(176.2,207.1);感染是最常见的类型。输注反应/100PY(95%CI)的发生率,联合MTX的戈利木单抗组为2.1(1.1,3.6),未使用MTX的戈利木单抗组为5.1(2.9,8.3);均无严重反应。联合MTX的戈利木单抗组与未使用MTX的戈利木单抗组相比,严重感染、机会性感染和恶性肿瘤的发生率/100PY(95%CI)分别为2.6(1.5,4.3)对7.0(4.4,10.6)、0.9(0.3,2.0)对2.6(1.1,5.0)、3.0(1.7,4.7)对1.0(0.2,2.8)。

结论

无论先前是否接受过生物疗法,未使用MTX的戈利木单抗组的CDAI评分平均变化在1年内总体上与联合MTX的戈利木单抗组相似。不良事件与已知的静脉注射戈利木单抗安全性特征一致。这些结果提供了真实世界的证据数据,可能有助于医疗保健提供者和RA患者做出明智的治疗决策。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov NCT02728934 2016年4月5日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1408/10045110/129068c56949/41927_2023_329_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验