School of Sport & Health Sciences, University of Brighton, 49 Darley Road, Eastbourne, BN20 7UR, UK.
Podoconsult Vansteenland Irene BV, Hendrik Consciencelaan 54, 9950, Lievegem, Belgium.
J Foot Ankle Res. 2023 Mar 27;16(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13047-023-00615-1.
Diabetic foot assessments detect patients at risk for developing a diabetes-related foot ulceration and can significantly reduce the risk of amputation. In order to organize this assessment effectively, diabetic foot assessment guidelines are required according to the International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot. However, these international guidelines have not been adapted into a national guideline for podiatrists in Flanders, Belgium. This study aims to identify the methods and guidelines currently used to assess the diabetic foot in private podiatry practices in Flanders, Belgium and to explore the podiatrists' opinions on developing a national diabetic foot assessment guideline.
This exploratory mixed method study was composed of an anonymous online survey comprising of open- and closed-ended questions followed by 1:1 online semi-structured interviews. Participants were recruited via e-mail and a closed private Facebook group of podiatry alumni. Data was analyzed using SPSS statistics and thematic analysis described by Braun and Clarke.
This study showed that the vascular assessment of the diabetic foot exists solely of a medical history and palpation of the pedal pulses. Non-invasive tests such as doppler, toe brachial pressure index or ankle brachial pressure index are seldom used. Only 66% reported to use a guideline for the diabetic foot assessment. There was a variety of reported guidelines and risk stratification systems in use in private podiatry practices in Flanders, Belgium.
Non-invasive tests such as the doppler, ankle brachial pressure index or toe brachial pressure index are rarely used for the vascular assessment of the diabetic foot. Diabetic foot assessment guidelines and risk stratification systems to identify patients at risk for developing a diabetic foot ulcer were not frequently used. International guidelines of the International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot have not yet been implemented in private podiatry practices in Flanders, Belgium. This exploratory research has provided useful information for future research studies.
糖尿病足评估可发现有发生糖尿病相关足部溃疡风险的患者,并可显著降低截肢风险。为了有效地进行这种评估,需要根据国际糖尿病足工作组制定糖尿病足评估指南。然而,这些国际指南尚未被改编为比利时佛兰德地区足病医生的国家指南。本研究旨在确定比利时佛兰德私人足病诊所目前用于评估糖尿病足的方法和指南,并探讨足病医生对制定国家糖尿病足评估指南的意见。
这项探索性混合方法研究由一项匿名在线调查组成,其中包括开放式和封闭式问题,随后进行了 1:1 的在线半结构化访谈。参与者通过电子邮件和一个封闭的私人 Facebook 组的足病学校友招募。使用 SPSS 统计数据和 Braun 和 Clarke 描述的主题分析对数据进行分析。
本研究表明,糖尿病足的血管评估仅基于病史和足部脉搏触诊。很少使用多普勒、趾肱压力指数或踝肱压力指数等非侵入性检查。只有 66%的人报告使用糖尿病足评估指南。在比利时佛兰德的私人足病诊所中,使用了各种不同的报告指南和风险分层系统。
多普勒、踝肱压力指数或趾肱压力指数等非侵入性检查很少用于糖尿病足的血管评估。糖尿病足评估指南和风险分层系统用于识别有发生糖尿病足溃疡风险的患者并不常用。国际糖尿病足工作组的国际指南尚未在比利时佛兰德的私人足病诊所实施。这项探索性研究为未来的研究提供了有用的信息。