• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

互联网使用、用户和认知:基于互联网的技术与互联网用户之间的认知关系。

Internet use, users, and cognition: on the cognitive relationships between Internet-based technology and Internet users.

机构信息

Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, USA.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2023 Mar 27;11(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01041-5.

DOI:10.1186/s40359-023-01041-5
PMID:36973829
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10042401/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to investigate growing Internet use in relation to memory and cognition. Though literature reveals human capability to utilize the Internet as a transactive memory source, the formational mechanisms of such transactive memory systems are not extensively explored. The Internet's comparative effects on transactive memory and semantic memory are also relatively unknown.

METHODS

This study comprises two experimental memory task survey phases utilizing null hypothesis and standard error tests to assess significance of results.

RESULTS

When information is expected to be saved and accessible, recall rates are lower, regardless of explicit instructions to remember (Phase 1, N = 20). Phase 2 suggests the importance of order of attempted recall: depending on whether users first attempt to recall (1) desired information or (2) the information's location, subsequent successful cognitive retrieval is more likely to occur for (1) only desired information or both desired information and location thereof or (2) only desired information's location, respectively (N = 22).

CONCLUSIONS

This study yields several theoretical advances in memory research. The notion of information being saved online and accessible in the future negatively affects semantic memory. Phase 2 reveals an adaptive dynamic-(1) as Internet users often have a vague idea of desired information before searching for it on the Internet, first accessing semantic memory serves as an aid for subsequent transactive memory use and (2) if transactive memory access is successful, the need to retrieve desired information from semantic memory is inherently eliminated. By repeatedly defaulting to first accessing semantic memory and then transactive memory or to accessing transactive memory only, Internet users may form and reinforce transactive memory systems with the Internet, or may refrain from enhancing and decrease reliance on transactive memory systems by repeatedly defaulting to access only semantic memory; the formation and permanence of transactive memory systems are subject to users' will. Future research spans the domains of psychology and philosophy.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨互联网使用的增长与记忆和认知的关系。尽管文献揭示了人类利用互联网作为交互记忆源的能力,但这种交互记忆系统的形成机制并未得到广泛探索。互联网对交互记忆和语义记忆的比较影响也相对未知。

方法

本研究包括两个实验记忆任务调查阶段,利用零假设和标准误差测试来评估结果的显著性。

结果

当信息预计被保存和可访问时,无论是否有明确的记忆指令(阶段 1,N=20),回忆率都会降低。阶段 2表明尝试回忆的顺序很重要:取决于用户是首先尝试回忆(1)所需信息还是(2)该信息的位置,随后成功的认知检索更有可能发生在(1)仅所需信息或(1)所需信息及其位置,或者(2)仅所需信息的位置,分别为(N=22)。

结论

本研究在记忆研究方面取得了几个理论进展。信息在线保存并在未来可访问的概念对语义记忆产生负面影响。阶段 2揭示了一种自适应动态-(1)因为互联网用户在上网搜索所需信息之前通常对其只有模糊的概念,首先访问语义记忆有助于随后使用交互记忆,以及(2)如果交互记忆访问成功,从语义记忆中检索所需信息的需求就会被内在地消除。通过反复默认首先访问语义记忆然后访问交互记忆,或者只访问交互记忆,互联网用户可能会形成和强化与互联网的交互记忆系统,或者通过反复默认只访问语义记忆来避免增强和减少对交互记忆系统的依赖;交互记忆系统的形成和持久性取决于用户的意愿。未来的研究跨越了心理学和哲学的领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8771/10045441/fac121b7e54a/40359_2023_1041_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8771/10045441/ded8b99970d1/40359_2023_1041_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8771/10045441/4226166ac26d/40359_2023_1041_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8771/10045441/fac121b7e54a/40359_2023_1041_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8771/10045441/ded8b99970d1/40359_2023_1041_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8771/10045441/4226166ac26d/40359_2023_1041_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8771/10045441/fac121b7e54a/40359_2023_1041_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Internet use, users, and cognition: on the cognitive relationships between Internet-based technology and Internet users.互联网使用、用户和认知:基于互联网的技术与互联网用户之间的认知关系。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Mar 27;11(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01041-5.
2
Google effects on memory: cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips.谷歌对记忆的影响:信息随手可得对认知的影响。
Science. 2011 Aug 5;333(6043):776-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1207745. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
3
Pretesting can be beneficial even when using the internet to answer questions.即使是在网上回答问题,预测试也可能是有益的。
Memory. 2022 Apr;30(4):388-395. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2020.1863990. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
4
Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory.交互记忆中的认知相互依赖与趋同期望。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Dec;81(6):1080-9.
5
People mistake the internet's knowledge for their own.人们将互联网上的知识误认为是自己的。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Oct 26;118(43). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2105061118.
6
Communication in Theory and Research on Transactive Memory Systems: A Literature Review.关于互易记忆系统的理论和研究中的沟通:文献综述。
Top Cogn Sci. 2019 Oct;11(4):644-667. doi: 10.1111/tops.12359. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
7
Mediation of transactive memory capability in relationship of social media usage and job performance.在社交媒体使用与工作绩效的关系中,交互记忆能力的中介作用。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 May 29;15:1361913. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1361913. eCollection 2024.
8
Externalising the autobiographical self: sharing personal memories online facilitated memory retention.将自传式自我外化:在网上分享个人记忆有助于记忆留存。
Memory. 2017 Jul;25(6):772-776. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2016.1221115. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
9
Investigating the influence of local and personal common ground on memory for conversation using an online referential communication task.采用在线指涉交际任务研究局部和个人共同基础对会话记忆的影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Jun;152(6):1598-1621. doi: 10.1037/xge0001341. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
10
Cognitive deficits in bipolar disorders: Implications for emotion.双相情感障碍中的认知缺陷:对情绪的影响。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2018 Feb;59:126-136. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Augmented memory: a survey of the approaches to remembering more.增强记忆:关于增强记忆方法的调查
Front Syst Neurosci. 2014 Mar 3;8:30. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00030. eCollection 2014.
2
Critical design elements of e-health applications for users with severe mental illness: singular focus, simple architecture, prominent contents, explicit navigation, and inclusive hyperlinks.针对重度精神疾病患者的电子健康应用程序的关键设计要素:单一重点、简单架构、突出内容、明确导航和包容性超链接。
Schizophr Bull. 2015 Mar;41(2):440-8. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbt194. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
3
Google effects on memory: cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips.
谷歌对记忆的影响:信息随手可得对认知的影响。
Science. 2011 Aug 5;333(6043):776-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1207745. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
4
Knowing what to remember and forget: a developmental study of cue memory in intentional forgetting.知道该记住什么和忘记什么:有意遗忘中线索记忆的发展性研究。
Mem Cognit. 1998 Sep;26(5):860-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03201169.