• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度尼西亚人群肩胛盂的三维形态计量学分析及其临床意义。

Three-dimensional morphometric analysis of glenoid in the Indonesian population and its clinical significance.

作者信息

Mangasah Holong, Aminata Iman Widya

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Fatmawati General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.

出版信息

J Orthop. 2023 Feb 9;37:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.02.002. eCollection 2023 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.jor.2023.02.002
PMID:36974093
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10039108/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Understanding glenoid morphometry is important in shoulder prosthetic replacement surgery. In total and reverse shoulder arthroplasty, the size of the implants has to be determined according to the morphometry of the shoulder. However, there has been no known data on glenoid morphometry in the Indonesian population.

METHODS

Seventy-four computed tomography scans of asymptomatic shoulders were obtained from the medical databases of a third referral hospital in Jakarta. Mimics Research 21.0 was used to reconstruct 3D models of the scapula from the DICOM files. The morphometry parameters included were glenoid fossa height (GFH), maximum glenoid fossa width (MGW), glenoid width at center of the glenoid fossa (CGW), vertical distance between maximum width and center (VDMC), glenoid version angle (GVA), glenoid inclination (GI), glenopolar angle (GPA), glenoid vault depth (GVD), coracoid length (CL), coracoid midpoint length (CML), coracoid tip height (CTH) and width (CTW), and coracoid midpoint height (CMH) and width (CMW).

RESULTS

Our study found the average Indonesian GFH was 30.24 mm, the MGW was 24.03 mm, the CGW was 22.46 mm, the VDMC was 3.67 mm, the GPA was 42.76°, the GVD 18.8 mm, the GVA was 2.39° retroverted, the GI was 3.15° superiorly inclined, the CL was 37.76 mm, the CML was 18.89 mm, the CTW was 13.31 mm, the CTH was 8.52 mm, the CMW was 14.21 mm, and the CMH was 10.46 mm. All parameters except VDMC, GVA, and GI showed significant differences between male and female subjects Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in dimension and orientation of the glenoid and coracoid between the right and left shoulder.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed a lower value of MGW, GFH, and GVD compared to other Asian ethnicities. These results may be helpful in designing smaller prostheses suitable for Indonesian glenoids.

摘要

背景

了解肩胛盂形态测量学在肩关节置换手术中很重要。在全肩关节置换术和反肩关节置换术中,植入物的尺寸必须根据肩部的形态测量学来确定。然而,关于印度尼西亚人群肩胛盂形态测量学尚无已知数据。

方法

从雅加达一家三级转诊医院的医学数据库中获取74例无症状肩部的计算机断层扫描图像。使用Mimics Research 21.0从DICOM文件重建肩胛骨的三维模型。纳入的形态测量参数包括肩胛盂窝高度(GFH)、肩胛盂窝最大宽度(MGW)、肩胛盂窝中心处的肩胛盂宽度(CGW)、最大宽度与中心之间的垂直距离(VDMC)、肩胛盂扭转角(GVA)、肩胛盂倾斜度(GI)、肩胛盂极角(GPA)、肩胛盂穹窿深度(GVD)、喙突长度(CL)、喙突中点长度(CML)、喙突尖高度(CTH)和宽度(CTW),以及喙突中点高度(CMH)和宽度(CMW)。

结果

我们的研究发现,印度尼西亚人的平均GFH为30.24毫米,MGW为24.03毫米,CGW为22.46毫米,VDMC为3.67毫米,GPA为42.76°,GVD为18.8毫米,GVA为后倾2.39°,GI为上倾3.15°,CL为37.76毫米,CML为18.89毫米,CTW为13.31毫米,CTH为8.52毫米,CMW为14.21毫米,CMH为10.46毫米。除VDMC、GVA和GI外,所有参数在男性和女性受试者之间均存在显著差异。同时,左右肩部的肩胛盂和喙突在尺寸和方向上无显著差异。

结论

我们的研究表明,与其他亚洲种族相比,印度尼西亚人的MGW、GFH和GVD值较低。这些结果可能有助于设计适合印度尼西亚肩胛盂的较小假体。

相似文献

1
Three-dimensional morphometric analysis of glenoid in the Indonesian population and its clinical significance.印度尼西亚人群肩胛盂的三维形态计量学分析及其临床意义。
J Orthop. 2023 Feb 9;37:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.02.002. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Morphology of Humeral Head and Glenoid in Normal Shoulder of Indonesian Population.印度尼西亚人群正常肩部肱骨头和肩胛盂的形态学
Orthop Res Rev. 2022 Dec 7;14:459-469. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S378658. eCollection 2022.
3
The reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle: a new measurement of glenoid inclination for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.反肩置换角度:反肩置换中测量肩胛盂倾斜度的新方法
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Jul;28(7):1281-1290. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.11.074. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
4
Morphometric analysis of the coracoid process and glenoid width: a 3D-CT study.喙突形态分析和肩胛盂宽度:三维 CT 研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Feb 24;15(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01600-1.
5
The study of 2-dimensional computed tomography scans of the glenoid anatomy in relation to reverse shoulder arthroplasty in the Southern Chinese population.中国南方人群中与反肩关节置换术相关的肩胛盂解剖结构的二维计算机断层扫描研究。
JSES Int. 2021 Apr 3;5(4):714-721. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.02.006. eCollection 2021 Jul.
6
Computed tomography morphological analysis of the scapula and its implications in shoulder arthroplasty.肩胛骨的计算机断层扫描形态学分析及其在肩关节置换术中的意义。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016 Feb;26(2):127-32. doi: 10.1007/s00590-015-1721-3. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
7
Evaluation of the coracoid and coracoacromial arch geometry on Thiel-embalmed cadavers using the three-dimensional MicroScribe digitizer.使用三维MicroScribe数字化仪评估经蒂尔固定的尸体上的喙突和喙肩弓几何结构。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Jan;25(1):136-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.08.036. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
8
An anthropometric evaluation of the scapula, with emphasis on the coracoid process and glenoid fossa in a South African population.对南非人群肩胛骨进行人体测量评估,重点关注喙突和关节盂。
Heliyon. 2019 Dec 27;6(1):e03107. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03107. eCollection 2020 Jan.
9
A gender-based comparison of coracoid and glenoid anatomy: CT analysis and discussion of potential impact on the Latarjet procedure.喙突和关节盂的性别解剖学比较:CT 分析及对 Latarjet 手术潜在影响的讨论。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jul;30(7):1503-1510. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.09.039. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
10
Determination of predisposing scapular anatomy with a statistical shape model-Part II: shoulder osteoarthritis.肩胛解剖结构易感性的统计学形状模型测定 - 第 2 部分:肩关节骨关节炎。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Sep;30(9):e558-e571. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.01.018. Epub 2021 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability of Four Suprascapular Notch Classification Systems.四种肩胛上切迹分类系统的观察者间和观察者内变异性
Cureus. 2024 Feb 18;16(2):e54389. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54389. eCollection 2024 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Three Dimensional Anthropometric Analysis of Glenoid Anatomy in Normal Indian Population.正常印度人群中肩胛盂解剖结构的三维人体测量分析
Indian J Orthop. 2021 Jan 3;55(4):861-868. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00321-1. eCollection 2021 Aug.
2
Geometric analysis of the humeral head and glenoid in the Indian population and its clinical significance.印度人群肱骨头和肩胛盂的几何分析及其临床意义。
JSES Int. 2020 Jul 22;4(4):992-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.06.008. eCollection 2020 Dec.
3
A gender-based comparison of coracoid and glenoid anatomy: CT analysis and discussion of potential impact on the Latarjet procedure.喙突和关节盂的性别解剖学比较:CT 分析及对 Latarjet 手术潜在影响的讨论。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jul;30(7):1503-1510. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.09.039. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
4
The implications of the glenoid angles and rotator cuff status in patients with osteoarthritis undergoing shoulder arthroplasty.骨关节炎患者行肩关节置换术中关节盂角度和肩袖状态的影响。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Oct 9;21(1):668. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03690-8.
5
Jakarta: A city of cities.雅加达:一座汇聚众多城市特色的城市。
Cities. 2020 Nov;106:102868. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102868. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
6
Assessment of the Glenoid Morphology Based on Demographic Data in the Turkish Population.基于土耳其人群的人口统计学数据评估肩盂形态。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Feb 10;2020:5736136. doi: 10.1155/2020/5736136. eCollection 2020.
7
Morphometric analysis of the coracoid process and glenoid width: a 3D-CT study.喙突形态分析和肩胛盂宽度:三维 CT 研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Feb 24;15(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01600-1.
8
Three-dimensional measurement of glenoid dimensions and orientations.肩胛盂尺寸和方向的三维测量。
J Orthop Sci. 2019 Jul;24(4):624-630. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.11.019. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
9
Automated Three-Dimensional Measurement of Glenoid Version and Inclination in Arthritic Shoulders.关节镜下评估骨关节炎患者肩盂倾斜角和前下倾斜角的新方法
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Jan 3;100(1):57-65. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01122.
10
Management of the floating shoulder: Does the glenopolar angle influence outcomes? A systematic review.浮动肩的治疗:肩胛盂极角会影响治疗结果吗?一项系统评价。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Feb;104(1):53-58. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.11.004. Epub 2017 Dec 12.