• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A cross sectional survey exploring the awareness and familiarity regarding patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) among joint reconstruction surgeons in India.一项横断面调查,旨在探究印度关节重建外科医生对患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)的知晓度和熟悉程度。
J Orthop. 2023 Feb 16;37:59-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.02.009. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
What Do Orthopaedists Believe is Needed for Incorporating Patient-reported Outcome Measures into Clinical Care? A Qualitative Study.骨科医生认为将患者报告的结局指标纳入临床护理需要什么?一项定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Apr 1;480(4):680-687. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002059.
3
Patient-reported outcome measurements in clinical routine of trauma, spine and craniomaxillofacial surgeons: between expectations and reality: a survey among 1212 surgeons.创伤、脊柱和颅颌面外科医生临床常规中的患者报告结局测量:期望与现实之间:对 1212 名外科医生的调查。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 11;8(6):e020629. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020629.
4
Use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) by orthopedic surgeons in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯矫形外科医生对患者报告结局测量(PROMs)的使用情况。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Dec 10;15(1):598. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02135-1.
5
Surgeon Perceptions of the Integration of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures into Clinical Practice.外科医生对患者报告的结局测量指标融入临床实践的看法。
J Surg Res. 2022 Dec;280:486-494. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.07.038. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
6
How do Patient-reported Outcome Scores in International Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Registries Compare?国际髋关节和膝关节置换登记处的患者报告结局评分如何比较?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Oct 1;480(10):1884-1896. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002306. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
7
Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Collection and Utilization: A Survey of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Members.患者报告结局测量工具的收集与应用:美国矫形外科医师学会会员调查。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024 Feb 1;32(3):114-122. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00879. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
8
Large variation in use of patient-reported outcome measures: A survey of 188 foot and ankle surgeons.患者报告结局指标使用情况差异巨大:对188名足踝外科医生的调查。
Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Jun;24(3):246-251. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2017.02.013. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
9
Exploring the impact of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) among orthopaedic surgeons in mainland China: systematic review and survey-based study on hip and knee instruments.探索患者报告结局测量(PROMs)在中国内地骨科医生中的影响:基于髋关节和膝关节仪器的系统评价和调查研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Jun 21;22(1):566. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04459-3.
10
Poor Knee-specific and Generic Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores at 6 Months Are Associated With Early Revision Knee Arthroplasty: A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.膝关节特异性和通用型患者报告结局测量评分在 6 个月时较差与早期翻修膝关节置换术相关:来自澳大利亚矫形协会全国关节置换登记处的一项研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Oct 1;480(10):1899-1909. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002301. Epub 2022 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of qualitative studies examining barriers and facilitators to orthopaedic surgeon engagement with patient-reported outcome measures data.一项对定性研究的系统评价,该研究探讨了骨科医生使用患者报告结局测量数据的障碍和促进因素。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Dec 18;8(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00820-x.
2
Clinical relevance of patient-reported outcome measures in patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.接受全髋关节置换术患者的患者报告结局测量的临床相关性:系统评价。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Nov;144(11):4907-4916. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05579-w. Epub 2024 Sep 24.

本文引用的文献

1
What Do Orthopaedists Believe is Needed for Incorporating Patient-reported Outcome Measures into Clinical Care? A Qualitative Study.骨科医生认为将患者报告的结局指标纳入临床护理需要什么?一项定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Apr 1;480(4):680-687. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002059.
2
Orthopedic Surgeon and Care Team Perceptions and Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Total Joint Replacement Patients.骨科医生和护理团队对全关节置换患者报告的结果的认知和使用。
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2021;79(3):176-185.
3
Use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) by orthopedic surgeons in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯矫形外科医生对患者报告结局测量(PROMs)的使用情况。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Dec 10;15(1):598. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02135-1.
4
Meaningful Clinical Applications of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Orthopaedics.患者报告结局测量在骨科中的有意义的临床应用。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Jan 6;103(1):84-91. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00624.
5
Current Trends in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Study of 4 Major Orthopaedic Journals.当前全膝关节置换术患者报告结局测量的趋势:四大骨科期刊研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Nov;33(11):3416-3421. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.06.034. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
6
Large variation in use of patient-reported outcome measures: A survey of 188 foot and ankle surgeons.患者报告结局指标使用情况差异巨大:对188名足踝外科医生的调查。
Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Jun;24(3):246-251. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2017.02.013. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
7
Building a Patient-Reported Outcome Metric Database: One Hospital's Experience.构建患者报告结局指标数据库:一家医院的经验。
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jun;31(6):1151-1154. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.017. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
8
Current Challenges in Using Patient-Reported Outcomes for Surgical Care and Performance Measurement: Everybody Wants to Hear From the Patient, but Are We Ready to Listen?在手术护理和绩效评估中使用患者报告结果的当前挑战:每个人都想听患者的意见,但我们准备好倾听了吗?
JAMA Surg. 2014 Jun;149(6):505-6. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.5285.
9
The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative research.专业人员运用患者报告结局测量信息以提高医疗质量的经验:一项定性研究的系统评价
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Jun;23(6):508-18. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002524. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
10
Access and barriers to health care delivery in Arab countries: a review.阿拉伯国家的医疗服务提供:获取途径和障碍评估。
East Mediterr Health J. 2012 Dec;18(12):1239-46. doi: 10.26719/2012.18.12.1239.

一项横断面调查,旨在探究印度关节重建外科医生对患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)的知晓度和熟悉程度。

A cross sectional survey exploring the awareness and familiarity regarding patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) among joint reconstruction surgeons in India.

作者信息

Paul Souvik, Barik Sitanshu, Raj Vikash, Raj Manish, Kalia Roop Bhushan, Goyal Tarun, Arora Manit, Nazeer Muhammed

机构信息

Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, India.

出版信息

J Orthop. 2023 Feb 16;37:59-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.02.009. eCollection 2023 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.jor.2023.02.009
PMID:36974097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10039111/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to describe the usage of PROM, its use or lack of use, barriers in using it and its future prospect among the arthroplasty surgeons from a developing country like India.

METHODS

An online survey was conducted by emailing an anonymous questionnaire to orthopaedic surgeons working in three tertiary care academic institutions and two tertiary care private hospitals. All orthopaedic surgeons or residents who have been performing or assisting in arthroplasty and arthroscopy were included in the study. The study was cross-sectional in design based on a single response from all surgeons.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 87 surgeons participating in this study was 38.6 ± 4.7 years. 62.1% of surgeons had used PROMs for both clinical as well as research purposes at some point. 25.9% of surgeons had an adequate understanding of the function, benefits, and drawbacks of PROMs. Among the barriers against using PROMs, time constraint was agreed upon by most of the surgeons (59.5%). 64.3% of surgeons were willing to incorporate the PROMs into their daily practice if the barriers are overcome.

CONCLUSION

The limitations of use of PROM should also be borne in mind before embarking on its widespread implementation. Involvement of regulatory and professional societies as well as substantial investment in manpower, money and time is required for making the use of PROMs regular.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在描述患者报告结局测量(PROM)在像印度这样的发展中国家的关节置换外科医生中的使用情况、其使用或未使用的情况、使用中的障碍以及未来前景。

方法

通过向在三家三级医疗学术机构和两家三级医疗私立医院工作的骨科医生发送匿名问卷进行在线调查。所有进行或协助关节置换和关节镜检查的骨科医生或住院医师都纳入了本研究。该研究基于所有外科医生的单一回复,采用横断面设计。

结果

参与本研究的87名外科医生的平均年龄为38.6±4.7岁。62.1%的外科医生在某些时候将PROM用于临床以及研究目的。25.9%的外科医生对PROM的功能、益处和缺点有充分的了解。在使用PROM的障碍中,大多数外科医生(59.5%)认同时间限制。如果障碍得以克服,64.3%的外科医生愿意将PROM纳入他们的日常实践。

结论

在广泛实施PROM之前,也应牢记其使用的局限性。为了使PROM的使用常态化,需要监管机构和专业协会的参与以及在人力、资金和时间方面的大量投入。