• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用电子健康记录的深度学习识别糖尿病患者他汀类药物未使用的原因。

Identifying Reasons for Statin Nonuse in Patients With Diabetes Using Deep Learning of Electronic Health Records.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute Stanford University Stanford CA.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland OH.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Apr 4;12(7):e028120. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028120. Epub 2023 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.122.028120
PMID:36974740
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10122887/
Abstract

Background Statins are guideline-recommended medications that reduce cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes. Yet, statin use is concerningly low in this high-risk population. Identifying reasons for statin nonuse, which are typically described in unstructured electronic health record data, can inform targeted system interventions to improve statin use. We aimed to leverage a deep learning approach to identify reasons for statin nonuse in patients with diabetes. Methods and Results Adults with diabetes and no statin prescriptions were identified from a multiethnic, multisite Northern California electronic health record cohort from 2014 to 2020. We used a benchmark deep learning natural language processing approach (Clinical Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) to identify statin nonuse and reasons for statin nonuse from unstructured electronic health record data. Performance was evaluated against expert clinician review from manual annotation of clinical notes and compared with other natural language processing approaches. Of 33 461 patients with diabetes (mean age 59±15 years, 49% women, 36% White patients, 24% Asian patients, and 15% Hispanic patients), 47% (15 580) had no statin prescriptions. From unstructured data, Clinical Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers accurately identified statin nonuse (area under receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.99 [0.98-1.0]) and key patient (eg, side effects/contraindications), clinician (eg, guideline-discordant practice), and system reasons (eg, clinical inertia) for statin nonuse (AUC 0.90 [0.86-0.93]) and outperformed other natural language processing approaches. Reasons for nonuse varied by clinical and demographic characteristics, including race and ethnicity. Conclusions A deep learning algorithm identified statin nonuse and actionable reasons for statin nonuse in patients with diabetes. Findings may enable targeted interventions to improve guideline-directed statin use and be scaled to other evidence-based therapies.

摘要

背景

他汀类药物是指南推荐的药物,可降低糖尿病患者的心血管事件。然而,在这一高危人群中,他汀类药物的使用率令人担忧。识别他汀类药物未使用的原因(通常在非结构化电子健康记录数据中描述)可以为有针对性的系统干预措施提供信息,以改善他汀类药物的使用。我们旨在利用深度学习方法来识别糖尿病患者他汀类药物未使用的原因。

方法和结果

从 2014 年至 2020 年,从加利福尼亚州北部一个多民族、多地点的电子健康记录队列中确定了没有他汀类药物处方的糖尿病成人患者。我们使用基准深度学习自然语言处理方法(临床双向编码器表示来自转换器)从非结构化电子健康记录数据中识别他汀类药物未使用的原因和他汀类药物未使用的原因。通过对临床笔记进行手动注释,由专家临床医生进行评估来评估性能,并与其他自然语言处理方法进行比较。在 33461 名患有糖尿病的患者(平均年龄 59±15 岁,49%为女性,36%为白人患者,24%为亚裔患者,15%为西班牙裔患者)中,有 47%(15580 人)没有他汀类药物处方。从非结构化数据中,临床双向编码器表示来自转换器可以准确识别他汀类药物未使用(接收者操作特征曲线下面积[AUROC]0.99[0.98-1.0])和关键患者(例如,副作用/禁忌症)、临床医生(例如,与指南不符的做法)和系统原因(例如,临床惰性)他汀类药物未使用(AUROC 0.90[0.86-0.93]),并优于其他自然语言处理方法。未使用的原因因临床和人口统计学特征而异,包括种族和民族。

结论

深度学习算法识别了糖尿病患者的他汀类药物未使用情况和他汀类药物未使用的可操作原因。这些发现可能使有针对性的干预措施能够改善基于指南的他汀类药物使用,并扩展到其他循证疗法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d289/10122887/3b0e7ac7362a/JAH3-12-e028120-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d289/10122887/061ed8307fa5/JAH3-12-e028120-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d289/10122887/3b0e7ac7362a/JAH3-12-e028120-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d289/10122887/061ed8307fa5/JAH3-12-e028120-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d289/10122887/3b0e7ac7362a/JAH3-12-e028120-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying Reasons for Statin Nonuse in Patients With Diabetes Using Deep Learning of Electronic Health Records.利用电子健康记录的深度学习识别糖尿病患者他汀类药物未使用的原因。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Apr 4;12(7):e028120. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028120. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
2
Using deep learning-based natural language processing to identify reasons for statin nonuse in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.利用基于深度学习的自然语言处理技术识别动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者未使用他汀类药物的原因。
Commun Med (Lond). 2022 Jul 15;2:88. doi: 10.1038/s43856-022-00157-w. eCollection 2022.
3
Natural language processing to identify reasons for sex disparity in statin prescriptions.利用自然语言处理技术识别他汀类药物处方中性别差异的原因。
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2023 Apr 11;14:100496. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2023.100496. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Classifying social determinants of health from unstructured electronic health records using deep learning-based natural language processing.利用基于深度学习的自然语言处理技术从非结构化电子健康记录中分类社会健康决定因素。
J Biomed Inform. 2022 Mar;127:103984. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103984. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
5
Characterization of Statin Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Dose-Response Using Electronic Health Records in a Large Population-Based Cohort.利用大型基于人群的队列电子健康记录对他汀类药物低密脂蛋白胆固醇剂量反应进行特征描述。
Circ Genom Precis Med. 2018 Sep;11(9):e002043. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.117.002043.
6
Discontinuation of statins in routine care settings: a cohort study.常规护理环境中停止使用他汀类药物:一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Apr 2;158(7):526-34. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-7-201304020-00004.
7
Contemporary rates and correlates of statin use and adherence in nondiabetic adults with cardiovascular risk factors: The KP CHAMP study.非糖尿病心血管危险因素成年患者他汀类药物使用及依从性的当代发生率与相关因素:KP CHAMP研究
Am Heart J. 2017 Dec;194:25-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.08.013. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
8
Statin Prescribing Patterns: An Analysis of Data From Patients With Diabetes in the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Outpatient Department and National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Databases, 2005-2010.他汀类药物处方模式:对2005 - 2010年国家医院门诊医疗调查门诊部和国家门诊医疗调查数据库中糖尿病患者数据的分析
Clin Ther. 2015 Jun 1;37(6):1329-39. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.03.020. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
9
Implications of American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Cholesterol Guidelines on Statin Underutilization for Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Diabetes Mellitus Among Several US Networks of Community Health Centers.美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会(ACC/AHA)胆固醇指南对几种美国社区卫生中心网络中糖尿病患者心血管疾病预防中他汀类药物未充分利用的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jul 3;6(7):e005627. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005627.
10
Assessment of Sex Disparities in Nonacceptance of Statin Therapy and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels Among Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk.评估高心血管风险患者中他汀类药物治疗不接受率和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平的性别差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e231047. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1047.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating New Technologies in Lipidology: A Comprehensive Review.脂质学中新技术的整合:全面综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 14;14(14):4984. doi: 10.3390/jcm14144984.
2
Incidental Finding of Coronary and Non-Coronary Artery Calcium: What Do Clinicians Need To Know?冠状动脉和非冠状动脉钙化的偶然发现:临床医生需要了解什么?
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2025 Jul 12;27(1):71. doi: 10.1007/s11883-025-01318-7.
3
Impact of Statin Nonacceptance on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes.他汀类药物不接受对糖尿病患者心血管结局的影响。

本文引用的文献

1
Using deep learning-based natural language processing to identify reasons for statin nonuse in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.利用基于深度学习的自然语言处理技术识别动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者未使用他汀类药物的原因。
Commun Med (Lond). 2022 Jul 15;2:88. doi: 10.1038/s43856-022-00157-w. eCollection 2022.
2
Statin Use in Pregnancy: Is It Time For a Paradigm Shift?孕期使用他汀类药物:是否到了转变范式的时候?
Circulation. 2022 Feb 15;145(7):496-498. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.058983. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
3
N-of-1 Trial of a Statin, Placebo, or No Treatment to Assess Side Effects.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Jun 3;14(11):e040464. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.040464. Epub 2025 May 13.
4
Artificial intelligence tools in supporting healthcare professionals for tailored patient care.支持医疗保健专业人员进行个性化患者护理的人工智能工具。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Apr 16;8(1):210. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01604-3.
5
Understanding Reasons for Oral Anticoagulation Nonprescription in Atrial Fibrillation Using Large Language Models.使用大语言模型理解心房颤动患者未接受口服抗凝治疗的原因
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Apr;14(7):e040419. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.040419. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
6
Achievement of guideline-based lipid goals among very-high-risk patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes: results in 213,380 individuals from the cvMOBIUS2 registry.在患有动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病和2型糖尿病的极高风险患者中实现基于指南的血脂目标:来自cvMOBIUS2注册研究的213,380例个体的结果
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2024 Dec 21;21:100921. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100921. eCollection 2025 Mar.
7
Clinical Decision Support and Cardiometabolic Medication Adherence: A Randomized Clinical Trial.临床决策支持与心血管代谢药物依从性:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2453745. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53745.
8
Applicability of Artificial Intelligence in the Field of Clinical Lipidology: A Narrative Review.人工智能在临床脂质学领域的适用性:一篇叙述性综述。
J Lipid Atheroscler. 2024 May;13(2):111-121. doi: 10.12997/jla.2024.13.2.111. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
9
Association of health information technology-driven multidisciplinary approaches with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol target achievement in patients with an acute coronary syndrome.健康信息技术驱动的多学科方法与急性冠状动脉综合征患者低密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标达成情况的关联
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2023 Nov 21;17:100613. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2023.100613. eCollection 2024 Mar.
10
Machine learning in precision diabetes care and cardiovascular risk prediction.机器学习在精准糖尿病护理和心血管风险预测中的应用。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023 Sep 25;22(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-01985-3.
一项比较他汀类药物、安慰剂或不治疗以评估副作用的单病例试验。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 26;383(22):2182-2184. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2031173. Epub 2020 Nov 15.
4
Effect of Passive Choice and Active Choice Interventions in the Electronic Health Record to Cardiologists on Statin Prescribing: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.被动选择和主动选择干预措施对电子病历中文献中他汀类药物处方的影响:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Jan 1;6(1):40-48. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.4730.
5
Changes in Statin Use Among U.S. Adults With Diabetes: A Population-Based Analysis of NHANES 2011-2018.美国糖尿病患者中他汀类药物使用的变化:基于 NHANES 2011-2018 的人群分析。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Dec;43(12):3110-3112. doi: 10.2337/dc20-1481. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
6
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining.BioBERT:一种用于生物医学文本挖掘的预训练生物医学语言表示模型。
Bioinformatics. 2020 Feb 15;36(4):1234-1240. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz682.
7
Diabetes Mellitus-Related All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in a National Cohort of Adults.糖尿病相关全因和心血管死亡率在一个全国成年人队列中。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Feb 19;8(4):e011295. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011295.
8
Association of Statin Adherence With Mortality in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.他汀类药物依从性与动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者死亡率的关系。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Mar 1;4(3):206-213. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.4936.
9
Statin Discontinuation, Reinitiation, and Persistence Patterns Among Medicare Beneficiaries After Myocardial Infarction: A Cohort Study.心肌梗死后医疗保险受益人的他汀类药物停药、重新开始用药及持续用药模式:一项队列研究
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Oct;10(10). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003626.
10
Use of high-intensity statins for patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the Veterans Affairs Health System: Practice impact of the new cholesterol guidelines.美国退伍军人事务部医疗系统中高强度他汀类药物在动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者中的应用:新胆固醇指南的实践影响
Am Heart J. 2016 Dec;182:97-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Sep 29.