• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持医疗保健专业人员进行个性化患者护理的人工智能工具。

Artificial intelligence tools in supporting healthcare professionals for tailored patient care.

作者信息

Kim Jiyeong, Chen Michael L, Rezaei Shawheen J, Hernandez-Boussard Tina, Chen Jonathan H, Rodriguez Fatima, Han Summer S, Lal Rayhan A, Kim Sun H, Dosiou Chrysoula, Seav Susan M, Akcan Tugce, Rodriguez Carolyn I, Asch Steven M, Linos Eleni

机构信息

Stanford Center for Digital Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Department of Biomedical Data Science, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

出版信息

NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Apr 16;8(1):210. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01604-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41746-025-01604-3
PMID:40240489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12003912/
Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools to support clinicians in providing patient-centered care can contribute to patient empowerment and care efficiency. We aimed to draft potential AI tools for tailored patient support corresponding to patients' needs and assess clinicians' perceptions about the usefulness of those AI tools. To define patients' issues, we analyzed 528,199 patient messages of 11,123 patients with diabetes by harnessing natural language processing and AI. Applying multiple prompt-engineering techniques, we drafted a series of AI tools, and five endocrinologists evaluated them for perceived usefulness and risk. Patient education and administrative support for timely and streamlined interaction were perceived as highly useful, yet deeper integration of AI tools into patient data was perceived as risky. This study proposes assorted AI applications as clinical assistance tailored to patients' needs substantiated by clinicians' evaluations. Findings could offer essential ramifications for developing potential AI tools for precision patient care for diabetes and beyond.

摘要

支持临床医生提供以患者为中心的护理的人工智能(AI)工具,有助于增强患者权能并提高护理效率。我们旨在起草与患者需求相对应的、用于量身定制患者支持的潜在人工智能工具,并评估临床医生对这些人工智能工具有用性的看法。为了明确患者的问题,我们利用自然语言处理和人工智能分析了11123名糖尿病患者的528199条患者信息。通过应用多种提示工程技术,我们起草了一系列人工智能工具,五名内分泌学家对其有用性和风险进行了评估。患者教育以及对及时、简化互动的行政支持被认为非常有用,但将人工智能工具更深入地整合到患者数据中则被认为存在风险。本研究提出了各种人工智能应用,作为根据临床医生评估结果量身定制的、满足患者需求的临床辅助手段。研究结果可能为开发用于糖尿病及其他疾病精准患者护理的潜在人工智能工具带来重要影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc66/12003912/b9e628b228e5/41746_2025_1604_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc66/12003912/bd725204834c/41746_2025_1604_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc66/12003912/9dd9c438acf0/41746_2025_1604_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc66/12003912/b9e628b228e5/41746_2025_1604_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc66/12003912/bd725204834c/41746_2025_1604_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc66/12003912/9dd9c438acf0/41746_2025_1604_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc66/12003912/b9e628b228e5/41746_2025_1604_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Artificial intelligence tools in supporting healthcare professionals for tailored patient care.支持医疗保健专业人员进行个性化患者护理的人工智能工具。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Apr 16;8(1):210. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01604-3.
2
Healthcare Leaders' Perceptions of the Usefulness of AI Applications in Clinical Work: A Qualitative Study.医疗保健领导者对人工智能应用在临床工作中有用性的看法:一项定性研究。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2023 May 18;302:678-679. doi: 10.3233/SHTI230235.
3
Patient Perception of Plain-Language Medical Notes Generated Using Artificial Intelligence Software: Pilot Mixed-Methods Study.患者对使用人工智能软件生成的通俗易懂的医疗记录的认知:混合方法试点研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Jun 5;4(6):e16670. doi: 10.2196/16670.
4
Adapting Artificial Intelligence Concepts to Enhance Clinical Decision-Making: A Hybrid Intelligence Framework.采用人工智能概念提升临床决策:一种混合智能框架。
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Nov 19;17:5417-5422. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S497753. eCollection 2024.
5
Needs and expectations for artificial intelligence in emergency medicine according to Canadian physicians.根据加拿大医生的说法,急诊医学对人工智能的需求和期望。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 25;23(1):798. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09740-w.
6
Optimizing ChatGPT's Interpretation and Reporting of Delirium Assessment Outcomes: Exploratory Study.优化 ChatGPT 对谵妄评估结果的解释和报告:探索性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Oct 1;8:e51383. doi: 10.2196/51383.
7
Clinicians' roles and necessary levels of understanding in the use of artificial intelligence: A qualitative interview study with German medical students.临床医生在使用人工智能方面的角色和必要的理解水平:一项对德国医学生的定性访谈研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Oct 7;25(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01109-w.
8
Artificial intelligence to revolutionize IBD clinical trials: a comprehensive review.人工智能将彻底改变炎症性肠病临床试验:全面综述。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 23;18:17562848251321915. doi: 10.1177/17562848251321915. eCollection 2025.
9
Utilizing large language models for gastroenterology research: a conceptual framework.利用大语言模型进行胃肠病学研究:一个概念框架。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 1;18:17562848251328577. doi: 10.1177/17562848251328577. eCollection 2025.
10
Clinicians' Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence: Focus on Workload, Risk, Trust, Clinical Decision Making, and Clinical Integration.临床医生对人工智能的看法:关注工作量、风险、信任、临床决策和临床整合。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 16;11(16):2308. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162308.

引用本文的文献

1
Utilisation of AI-driven chatbots for perioperative health information seeking: a descriptive qualitative study of orthopaedic patients and family members.利用人工智能驱动的聊天机器人获取围手术期健康信息:一项针对骨科患者及其家属的描述性定性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 4;15(9):e099824. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099824.
2
Evaluation of performance of generative large language models for stroke care.用于中风护理的生成式大语言模型的性能评估。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jul 29;8(1):481. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01830-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Telehealth Utilization and Associations in the United States During the Third Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Population-Based Survey Study in 2022.2022 年基于人群的调查研究:在 COVID-19 大流行的第三年,美国的远程医疗利用情况及其关联。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Apr 26;10:e51279. doi: 10.2196/51279.
2
Can AI Think Like a Plastic Surgeon? Evaluating GPT-4's Clinical Judgment in Reconstructive Procedures of the Upper Extremity.人工智能能像整形外科医生一样思考吗?评估GPT-4在上肢重建手术中的临床判断力。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Dec 13;11(12):e5471. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005471. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Prevalence and associations of poor mental health in the third year of COVID-19: U.S. population-based analysis from 2020 to 2022.
2020 年至 2022 年美国基于人群的分析:COVID-19 第三年的心理健康不良流行率及其关联。
Psychiatry Res. 2023 Dec;330:115622. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115622. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
4
Natural language processing system for rapid detection and intervention of mental health crisis chat messages.用于快速检测和干预心理健康危机聊天信息的自然语言处理系统。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Nov 21;6(1):213. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00951-3.
5
Assessing Biases in Medical Decisions via Clinician and AI Chatbot Responses to Patient Vignettes.通过临床医生和人工智能聊天机器人对患者病例的回答评估医疗决策中的偏差
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2338050. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.38050.
6
Systematic Review to Gauge the Effect of Levothyroxine Substitution on Progression of Diabetic Nephropathy in Patients With Hypothyroidism and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.评估左甲状腺素替代治疗对甲状腺功能减退合并2型糖尿病患者糖尿病肾病进展影响的系统评价
Cureus. 2023 Sep 5;15(9):e44729. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44729. eCollection 2023 Sep.
7
Chatbot vs Medical Student Performance on Free-Response Clinical Reasoning Examinations.聊天机器人与医学生在自由应答临床推理考试中的表现对比
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Sep 1;183(9):1028-1030. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.2909.
8
Performance of a Large Language Model on Practice Questions for the Neonatal Board Examination.大型语言模型在新生儿科专业考试练习题上的表现
JAMA Pediatr. 2023 Sep 1;177(9):977-979. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.2373.
9
Diabetes: a defining disease of the 21st century.糖尿病:21世纪的标志性疾病。
Lancet. 2023 Jun 24;401(10394):2087. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01296-5.
10
Rating analysis and BERTopic modeling of consumer versus regulated mHealth app reviews in Germany.德国消费者与受监管的移动健康应用程序评论的评级分析与BERTopic建模
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Jun 21;6(1):115. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00862-3.