Suppr超能文献

左心室射血分数中等范围的急性心力衰竭:临床特征、住院治疗及短期预后

Acute heart failure with mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction: clinical profile, in-hospital management, and short-term outcome.

作者信息

Farmakis Dimitrios, Simitsis Panagiotis, Bistola Vasiliki, Triposkiadis Filippos, Ikonomidis Ignatios, Katsanos Spyridon, Bakosis George, Hatziagelaki Erifili, Lekakis John, Mebazaa Alexandre, Parissis John

机构信息

Heart Failure Unit, Department of Cardiology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 1 Rimini St, 12462, Athens, Greece.

Department of Cardiology, Larissa University Hospital, Larissa, Greece.

出版信息

Clin Res Cardiol. 2017 May;106(5):359-368. doi: 10.1007/s00392-016-1063-0. Epub 2016 Dec 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Heart failure with mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction (HFmrEF) is a poorly characterized population as it has been studied either in the context of HF with reduced (HFrEF) or preserved (HFpEF) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) depending on applied LVEF cutoffs. We sought to investigate the clinical profile, in-hospital management, and short-term outcome of HFmrEF patients in comparison with those with HFrEF or HFpEF in a large acute HF cohort.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Acute Heart Failure Global Registry of Standard Treatment (ALARM-HF) included 4953 patients hospitalized for HF in nine countries in Europe, Latin America, and Australia. Baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, in-hospital therapies, and short-term mortality (all-cause in-hospital or 30-day mortality, whichever first) were compared among HFrEF (LVEF <40%), HFmrEF (LVEF 40-49%), and HFpEF (LVEF ≥50%) patients. Among 3257 patients with documented LVEF, 52% had HFrEF, 25% HFmrEF, and 23% HFpEF. Patients with HFmrEF had a distinct demographic and clinical profile with many intermediate features between HFrEF and HFpEF. In addition, they had a higher prevalence of hypertension (p < 0.001), a lower prevalence of chronic renal disease (p = 0.003), more hospitalizations for acute coronary syndrome (p < 0.001), or infection (p = 0.003), and were more frequently treated with intravenous vasodilators compared to HFrEF or HFpEF. Adjusted short-term mortality in HFmrEF was lower than HFrEF [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.635 (0.419, 0.963), p = 0.033] but similar to HFpEF [HR = 1.026 (0.605, 1.741), p = 0.923].

CONCLUSION

Hospitalized HFmrEF patients represent a demographically and clinically diverse group with many intermediate features compared to HFrEF and HFpEF and carry a lower risk of short-term mortality than HFrEF but a similar risk with HFpEF.

摘要

背景

射血分数中度降低的心力衰竭(HFmrEF)患者群体特征尚不明确,因为根据所采用的左心室射血分数(LVEF)临界值,对该群体的研究要么是在射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)背景下,要么是在射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)背景下进行的。我们试图在一个大型急性心力衰竭队列中,比较HFmrEF患者与HFrEF或HFpEF患者的临床特征、住院治疗情况及短期预后。

方法和结果

急性心力衰竭标准治疗全球注册研究(ALARM-HF)纳入了欧洲、拉丁美洲和澳大利亚9个国家因心力衰竭住院的4953例患者。比较HFrEF(LVEF<40%)、HFmrEF(LVEF 40-49%)和HFpEF(LVEF≥50%)患者的基线特征、临床表现、住院治疗及短期死亡率(全因住院死亡率或30天死亡率,以先发生者为准)。在3257例记录了LVEF的患者中,52%为HFrEF,25%为HFmrEF,23%为HFpEF。HFmrEF患者具有独特的人口统计学和临床特征,在HFrEF和HFpEF之间有许多中间特征。此外,他们高血压患病率较高(p<0.001),慢性肾病患病率较低(p=0.003),因急性冠状动脉综合征住院的比例更高(p<0.001)或感染住院的比例更高(p=0.003),与HFrEF或HFpEF相比,接受静脉血管扩张剂治疗的频率更高。HFmrEF患者调整后的短期死亡率低于HFrEF[风险比(HR)=0.635(0.419,0.963),p=0.033],但与HFpEF相似[HR=1.026(0.605,1.741),p=0.923]。

结论

住院的HFmrEF患者在人口统计学和临床上是一个多样化的群体,与HFrEF和HFpEF相比有许多中间特征,短期死亡风险低于HFrEF,但与HFpEF相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验