• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物涂层球囊和药物洗脱支架在股腘动脉和严重慢性肾脏病患者中的安全性。

Drug-Coated Balloon and Drug-Eluting Stent Safety in Patients With Femoropopliteal and Severe Chronic Kidney Disease.

机构信息

Department of Medicine Yale School of Medicine New Haven CT USA.

Vascular Medicine Outcomes Program (VAMOS), Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine Yale School of Medicine New Haven CT USA.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Apr 4;12(7):e028622. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028622. Epub 2023 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.122.028622
PMID:36974774
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10122876/
Abstract

Background Patients with severe-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) were excluded from femoropopliteal disease trials evaluating drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and drug-eluting stents (DESs) versus plain balloon angioplasty (POBA) and bare metal stents (BMSs). We examined the interaction between CKD status and device type for the association with 24-month all-cause mortality and major amputation risk. Methods and Results We studied patients undergoing femoropopliteal interventions (September 2016-December 2018) from Medicare-linked VQI (Vascular Quality Initiative) registry data. We compared outcomes for: (1) early-stage CKD (stages 1-3) receiving DCB/DES, (2) early-stage CKD receiving POBA/BMS, (3) severe-stage (4 and 5) CKD receiving DCB/DES, and (4) severe-stage CKD receiving POBA/BMS. We studied 8799 patients (early-stage CKD: 94%; severe-stage: 6%). DCB/DES use was 57% versus 51% in patients with early-stage versus severe-stage CKD. Twenty-four-month mortality risk for patients with early-stage CKD receiving DCB/DES (reference) was 21% versus 28% (hazard ratio [HR], 1.47 [95% CI, 1.31-1.65]) for those receiving POBA/BMS; patients with severe-stage CKD: those receiving DCB/DES had a 49% (HR, 2.61 [95% CI, 2.06-3.31]) mortality risk versus 52% (HR, 3.64 [95% CI, 2.91-4.55]) for those receiving POBA/BMS (interaction <0.001). Adjusted analyses attenuated these results. For severe-stage CKD, DCB/DES versus POBA/BMS mortality risk was not significant at 24 months (post hoc comparison =0.06) but was higher for the POBA/BMS group at 18 months (post hoc <0.05). Patients with early-stage CKD receiving DCB/DES had the lowest 24-month amputation risk (6%), followed by 11% for early-stage CKD-POBA/BMS, 15% for severe-stage CKD-DCB/DES, and 16% for severe-stage CKD-POBA/BMS (interaction <0.001). DCB/DES versus POBA/BMS amputation rates in patients with severe-stage CKD did not differ (post hoc =0.820). Conclusions DCB/DES versus POBA/BMS use in patients with severe-stage CKD was associated with lower mortality and no difference in amputation outcomes.

摘要

背景 患有严重阶段慢性肾脏病(CKD)的患者被排除在评估药物涂层球囊(DCB)和药物洗脱支架(DES)与单纯球囊血管成形术(POBA)和裸金属支架(BMS)治疗股腘动脉疾病的试验之外。我们研究了 CKD 状态与器械类型之间的相互作用与 24 个月全因死亡率和主要截肢风险的关系。

方法 我们研究了 Medicare 相关 VQI(血管质量倡议)登记数据中接受股腘动脉介入治疗的患者(2016 年 9 月至 2018 年 12 月)。我们比较了以下结果:(1)接受 DCB/DES 的早期 CKD(1-3 期)患者,(2)接受 POBA/BMS 的早期 CKD 患者,(3)接受 DCB/DES 的严重 CKD(4 期和 5 期)患者,(4)接受 POBA/BMS 的严重 CKD 患者。我们研究了 8799 名患者(早期 CKD:94%;严重 CKD:6%)。早期 CKD 患者中 DCB/DES 的使用率为 57%,而严重 CKD 患者中为 51%。早期 CKD 接受 DCB/DES 治疗的患者(参考)的 24 个月死亡率风险为 21%,而接受 POBA/BMS 治疗的患者为 28%(风险比[HR],1.47 [95%CI,1.31-1.65]);严重 CKD 患者:接受 DCB/DES 治疗的患者的死亡率风险为 49%(HR,2.61 [95%CI,2.06-3.31]),而接受 POBA/BMS 治疗的患者为 52%(HR,3.64 [95%CI,2.91-4.55])(交互作用<0.001)。调整后的分析结果减弱了这些结果。对于严重 CKD,DCB/DES 与 POBA/BMS 的 24 个月死亡率风险无显著差异(事后比较=0.06),但 POBA/BMS 组在 18 个月时的死亡率更高(事后比较<0.05)。接受 DCB/DES 治疗的早期 CKD 患者的 24 个月截肢风险最低(6%),其次是早期 CKD-POBA/BMS 组(11%),严重 CKD-DCB/DES 组(15%)和严重 CKD-POBA/BMS 组(交互作用<0.001)。严重 CKD 患者中 DCB/DES 与 POBA/BMS 的截肢率没有差异(事后比较=0.820)。

结论 在严重 CKD 患者中,与 POBA/BMS 相比,使用 DCB/DES 与较低的死亡率相关,且在截肢结局方面无差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/251e/10122876/829a5aae8c78/JAH3-12-e028622-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/251e/10122876/3c3217d28420/JAH3-12-e028622-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/251e/10122876/f1528f0b14f7/JAH3-12-e028622-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/251e/10122876/829a5aae8c78/JAH3-12-e028622-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/251e/10122876/3c3217d28420/JAH3-12-e028622-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/251e/10122876/f1528f0b14f7/JAH3-12-e028622-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/251e/10122876/829a5aae8c78/JAH3-12-e028622-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Drug-Coated Balloon and Drug-Eluting Stent Safety in Patients With Femoropopliteal and Severe Chronic Kidney Disease.药物涂层球囊和药物洗脱支架在股腘动脉和严重慢性肾脏病患者中的安全性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Apr 4;12(7):e028622. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028622. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
2
Patient-level and external factors in the use of drug-coated balloons and drug-eluting stents in femoropopliteal endovascular interventions.股腘动脉腔内介入治疗中药物涂层球囊和药物洗脱支架使用的患者层面和外部因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Dec;76(6):1675-1680. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.06.093. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of drug-coated therapies in the superficial femoral artery.药物涂层球囊治疗股浅动脉病变的成本效果分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jan;67(1):343-352. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.06.112. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
4
Nationwide trends in drug-coated balloon and drug-eluting stent utilization in the femoropopliteal arteries.全国范围内股腘动脉中药物涂层球囊和药物洗脱支架的应用趋势。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Feb;71(2):560-566. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.05.034. Epub 2019 Aug 10.
5
Angioplasty or bare metal stent versus drug-eluting endovascular treatment in femoropopliteal artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.股腘动脉疾病中血管成形术或裸金属支架与药物洗脱血管内治疗的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2019 Oct;60(5):546-556. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.19.11115-9. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
6
Economic analysis of endovascular interventions for femoropopliteal arterial disease: a systematic review and budget impact model for the United States and Germany.股腘动脉疾病血管内介入治疗的经济分析:美国和德国的系统评价与预算影响模型
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Oct 1;84(4):546-54. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25536. Epub 2014 May 27.
7
Drug-coated balloon versus plain old balloon angioplasty in femoropopliteal disease: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.药物涂层球囊与普通球囊血管成形术治疗股腘动脉疾病:随机对照试验的更新荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jul 1;94(1):139-148. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28176. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
8
Systematic review and updated meta-analysis of the use of drug-coated balloon angioplasty versus plain old balloon angioplasty for femoropopliteal arterial disease.药物涂层球囊血管成形术与普通球囊血管成形术治疗股腘动脉疾病的系统评价和更新的荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Sep;70(3):981-995.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.01.080. Epub 2019 May 21.
9
Network meta-analysis of drug-coated balloon angioplasty versus primary nitinol stenting for femoropopliteal atherosclerotic disease.药物涂层球囊血管成形术与初次镍钛诺支架置入治疗股腘动脉粥样硬化性疾病的网状 Meta 分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 May;73(5):1802-1810.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.10.075. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
10
Mid-term Efficacy and Safety of Drug-coated Balloon versus Nitinol Bare Metal Stent for Primary Lesions in Femoropopliteal Artery Disease.药物涂层球囊与镍钛诺裸金属支架治疗股腘动脉疾病原发病变的中期疗效和安全性
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Apr;81:316-323. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.09.022. Epub 2021 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of mortality and amputation after lower extremity bypass versus peripheral vascular intervention in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia and comorbid chronic kidney disease.比较慢性肢体威胁性缺血合并伴发慢性肾脏病患者下肢旁路与外周血管介入治疗后的死亡率和截肢率。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Aug;80(2):480-489.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.04.016. Epub 2024 Apr 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Editor's Choice - Risk of Major Amputation Following Application of Paclitaxel Coated Balloons in the Lower Limb Arteries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.编辑精选 - 紫杉醇涂层球囊在下肢动脉中的应用后发生主要截肢的风险:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022 Jan;63(1):60-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.05.027. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
2
Epidemiology of Peripheral Artery Disease and Polyvascular Disease.外周动脉疾病和多血管疾病的流行病学。
Circ Res. 2021 Jun 11;128(12):1818-1832. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318535. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
3
Mortality with Paclitaxel-Coated Devices in Peripheral Artery Disease.
紫杉醇涂层器械在外周动脉疾病中的死亡率。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 24;383(26):2538-2546. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2005206. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
4
The Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes (VISION) Coordinated Registry Network: An effort to advance evidence evaluation for vascular devices.血管植入物监测和介入治疗结局(VISION)协调注册网络:一项推进血管器械证据评估的努力。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Dec;72(6):2153-2160. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.04.507. Epub 2020 May 20.
5
Mortality and Paclitaxel-Coated Devices: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.死亡率和紫杉醇涂层器械:一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2020 Jun 9;141(23):1859-1869. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044697. Epub 2020 May 6.
6
Mortality After Paclitaxel Coated Balloon Angioplasty and Stenting of Superficial Femoral and Popliteal Artery in the Vascular Quality Initiative.血管质量倡议中紫杉醇涂层球囊血管成形术和股浅动脉及腘动脉支架置入术后的死亡率。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb;13(2):e008528. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008528. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
7
Risk of Death and Amputation with Use of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in the Infrapopliteal Arteries for Treatment of Critical Limb Ischemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.紫杉醇涂层球囊在治疗严重肢体缺血的腘动脉以下动脉中的应用与死亡和截肢风险:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Feb;31(2):202-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.11.015. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
8
Nationwide trends in drug-coated balloon and drug-eluting stent utilization in the femoropopliteal arteries.全国范围内股腘动脉中药物涂层球囊和药物洗脱支架的应用趋势。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Feb;71(2):560-566. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.05.034. Epub 2019 Aug 10.
9
Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons and Eluting Stents: Is There a Mortality Risk in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease?紫杉醇涂层球囊和药物洗脱支架:外周动脉疾病患者的死亡率存在风险吗?
Circulation. 2019 Oct 15;140(16):1342-1351. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041099. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
10
Creation and Validation of Linkage Between Orthopedic Registry and Administrative Data Using Indirect Identifiers.利用间接标识符创建和验证骨科登记处与管理数据之间的链接。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jun;34(6):1076-1081.e0. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.063. Epub 2019 Feb 2.