Department of Neuroscience DNS, Audiology Unit at Treviso Hospital, University of Padova, Treviso, Italy.
J Int Adv Otol. 2023 Mar;19(2):116-120. doi: 10.5152/iao.2023.22787.
Bilateral hearing aids are desirable to restore hearing in the most effective and natural way. The aim of the present study was to identify which type of hearing rehabilitation was preferred by our patients and which factors drove their choice.
One hundred eight patients with moderate-to-severe asymmetrical hearing loss before and after a 1-month trial with bilateral hearing aids were considered.
As high as 58.3% of patients decided to continue with bilateral hearing aids (group BI), while 41.7% chose unilateral hearing aid (UNI group) in the best ear. Patients in the UNI group were significantly older than those in the BI group (P=.04); age > 77 years was an independent prognostic factor of unilateral hearing aid choice (odds ratio=6.26; P=.04). Matrix test scored significantly worse with a single hearing aid than with 2 hearing aids in both groups (UNI P=.03; BI P=.01).
Patients with asymmetric hearing loss often prefer unilateral hearing aid, almost half in our experience. Nonetheless, bilateral hearing aids are desirable as unilateral hearing aid was associated with significantly poorer performance at a speech in noise hearing tests. Age at fitting could play a relevant role and is thus important in early diagnosis. Further studies are needed to confirm our results and investigate strategies to promote bilateral rehabilitation.
双侧助听器是恢复听力最有效和自然的方式。本研究的目的是确定我们的患者更喜欢哪种类型的听力康复,以及哪些因素推动了他们的选择。
考虑了 108 名在双侧助听器试用 1 个月前后患有中重度不对称性听力损失的患者。
高达 58.3%的患者决定继续使用双侧助听器(BI 组),而 41.7%的患者在最佳耳朵中选择单侧助听器(UNI 组)。UNI 组患者明显比 BI 组患者年龄大(P=.04);年龄>77 岁是单侧助听器选择的独立预后因素(优势比=6.26;P=.04)。在两组中,单侧助听器的矩阵测试得分均显著低于双侧助听器(UNI P=.03;BI P=.01)。
患有不对称性听力损失的患者通常更喜欢单侧助听器,在我们的经验中几乎有一半是这样。然而,由于单侧助听器在噪声环境下的言语听力测试中表现明显较差,因此双侧助听器是理想的选择。适配时的年龄可能起重要作用,因此早期诊断很重要。需要进一步的研究来证实我们的结果,并探讨促进双侧康复的策略。