• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜修复肝移植受者切口疝的安全性。

Safety of laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias in liver transplant recipients.

机构信息

Australian National Liver Transplantation Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2023 Jun;37(6):e14969. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14969. Epub 2023 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1111/ctr.14969
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Incisional hernia is a common complication following liver transplantation occurring in 5%-34% of patients. Traditionally, open repair was standard due to fear of abdominal adhesions, postoperative complications and lack of experience with laparoscopic techniques. Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair (LIHR) has now become routine in non-transplant patients, with improved postoperative outcomes. In this study, we compared outcomes after laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repair after liver transplantation at a high-volume liver transplant center.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study including all incisional hernia repairs performed on post-liver transplant patients at a major liver transplant center in Australia from 2010 to 2021. Donor, recipient, intraoperative and postoperative variables were collected from the electronic medical record focusing on laparoscopic and open repairs.

RESULTS

Between January 2010 and March 2021, 138 patients underwent incisional hernia repair: 40 laparoscopic (29%) and 98 open (71%). No difference in wound infection (2.5% vs. 7.7%, p = .243); wound dehiscence (.00% vs. 2.3%, p = .332) or hernia recurrence (16.3% vs. 23.0%, p = .352) was seen between treatment groups. For larger incisional hernias (>5 cm) we found that a laparoscopic repair reduced length of stay compared to open-repair (3.89 vs. 4.57 days, p = .026).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic repair of larger incisional hernias reduced postoperative length of hospital stay, whilst potential advantages may include reduced wound complications and hernia recurrence. Importantly, laparoscopic repair did not increase postoperative complication rates and represents a safe technique for repair in this demographic.

摘要

引言

切口疝是肝移植术后的一种常见并发症,发生率为 5%-34%。传统上,由于担心腹部粘连、术后并发症和缺乏腹腔镜技术经验,开放修复是标准方法。腹腔镜切口疝修补术(LIHR)现在已成为非移植患者的常规手术,术后结果得到改善。在这项研究中,我们比较了在高容量肝移植中心,肝移植后行腹腔镜和开放切口疝修补术的结果。

方法

我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2010 年至 2021 年期间在澳大利亚一家主要肝移植中心接受肝移植后行切口疝修补术的所有患者。从电子病历中收集供体、受体、术中及术后变量,重点关注腹腔镜和开放修复。

结果

2010 年 1 月至 2021 年 3 月,共有 138 例患者行切口疝修补术:40 例腹腔镜(29%),98 例开放(71%)。两组在伤口感染(2.5%比 7.7%,p=0.243)、伤口裂开(0.00%比 2.3%,p=0.332)或疝复发(16.3%比 23.0%,p=0.352)方面无差异。对于较大的切口疝(>5cm),我们发现腹腔镜修复术较开放修复术缩短了住院时间(3.89 比 4.57 天,p=0.026)。

结论

腹腔镜治疗较大的切口疝可减少术后住院时间,潜在的优势可能包括减少伤口并发症和疝复发。重要的是,腹腔镜修复术并未增加术后并发症发生率,代表了该人群安全的手术技术。

相似文献

1
Safety of laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias in liver transplant recipients.腹腔镜修复肝移植受者切口疝的安全性。
Clin Transplant. 2023 Jun;37(6):e14969. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14969. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
2
Analysis of 4,015 recurrent incisional hernia repairs from the Herniamed registry: risk factors and outcomes.对来自Herniamed注册中心的4015例复发性切口疝修补术的分析:危险因素和结果。
Hernia. 2021 Feb;25(1):61-75. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02263-x. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
3
Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair After Liver Transplantation: Long-Term Series and Literature Review.肝移植术后腹腔镜切口疝修补术:长期系列研究与文献综述
Transplant Proc. 2020 Jun;52(5):1514-1517. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.01.082. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
4
Outcome analysis of laparoscopic incisional hernia repair and risk factors for hernia recurrence in liver transplant patients.肝移植患者腹腔镜切口疝修补术的疗效分析及疝复发的危险因素
Clin Transplant. 2015 Oct;29(10):866-71. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12558. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
5
Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair after colorectal surgery. Is it possible to maintain a mini-invasive approach?结直肠手术后的腹腔镜切口疝修补术。能否维持微创方法?
Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5290-5294. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4878-x. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
6
Outcomes of recurrent incisional hernia repair by open and laparoscopic approaches: a propensity score-matched comparison.开放和腹腔镜手术治疗复发性切口疝的结局:倾向评分匹配比较。
Hernia. 2023 Oct;27(5):1289-1298. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02833-9. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
7
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with composite mesh: Analysis of risk factors for recurrence in 185 patients with 5 years follow-up.腹腔镜下腹膜前疝修补术复合补片:5 年随访 185 例患者复发的危险因素分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Apr;40:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
8
Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open intraperitoneal onlay mesh incisional hernia repair: a propensity score-matched analysis.腹腔镜与开放式腹腔内补片修补术治疗切口疝的长期疗效:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jan;33(1):225-233. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6298-6. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
9
Open or laparoscopic mesh repair of incisional hernia in patients that underwent liver transplantation: A systematic review and proportional meta-analysis.肝移植术后患者行开放式或腹腔镜网片修补切口疝:系统评价和比例荟萃分析。
Clin Transplant. 2020 Dec;34(12):e14103. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14103. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
10
Incisional hernia repair following pancreatic surgery-open vs laparoscopic approach.胰腺手术后切口疝修补术:开放与腹腔镜方法比较。
Hernia. 2024 Feb;28(1):155-165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02901-0. Epub 2023 Oct 30.