• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝硬化患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Khandait Harshwardhan, Jaiswal Vikash, Hanif Muhammad, Shrestha Abhigan Babu, Iturburu Alisson, Shah Maitri, Ishak Angela, Garimella Vamsi, Ang Song Peng, Mathew Midhun

机构信息

Trinitas Regional Medical Center/RWJ Barnabas Health, Elizabeth, NJ 07202, USA.

Department of Research, JCCR Cardiology Research, Varanasi 221005, India.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Feb 21;10(3):92. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10030092.

DOI:10.3390/jcdd10030092
PMID:36975856
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10059068/
Abstract

There is a paucity of data and minimal literature on outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among liver cirrhosis patients. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical outcomes among liver cirrhosis patients post-PCI. We conducted a comprehensive literature search in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus databases for relevant studies. Effect sizes were pooled using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model as an odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A total of 3 studies met the inclusion criteria, providing data from 10,705,976 patients. A total of 28,100 patients were in the PCI + Cirrhosis group and 10,677,876 patients were in the PCI-only group. The mean age of patients with PCI + Cirrhosis and PCI alone was 63.45 and 64.35 years. The most common comorbidity was hypertension among the PCI + Cirrhosis group compared with PCI alone (68.15% vs. 73.6%). Cirrhosis patients post-PCI were had higher rates of in-hospital mortality (OR, 4.78 (95%CI: 3.39-6.75), < 0.001), GI bleeding (OR, 1.91 (95%CI:1.83-1.99), < 0.001, I = 0%), stroke (OR, 2.48 (95%CI:1.68-3.66), < 0.001), AKI (OR, 3.66 (95%CI: 2.33-6.02), < 0.001), and vascular complications (OR, 1.50 (95%CI: 1.13-1.98), < 0.001) compared with the PCI group without cirrhosis. Patients with cirrhosis are at a high risk for mortality and adverse outcomes post-PCI procedure compared to the PCI-only group of patients.

摘要

关于肝硬化患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的结局,现有数据匮乏且相关文献极少。因此,我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估肝硬化患者PCI术后的临床结局。我们在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane和Scopus数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,以查找相关研究。效应量采用DerSimonian和Laird随机效应模型合并,以比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI)表示。共有3项研究符合纳入标准,提供了来自10705976例患者的数据。PCI+肝硬化组共有28100例患者,单纯PCI组有10677876例患者。PCI+肝硬化组和单纯PCI组患者的平均年龄分别为63.45岁和64.35岁。与单纯PCI组相比,PCI+肝硬化组最常见的合并症是高血压(68.15%对73.6%)。与无肝硬化的PCI组相比,PCI术后的肝硬化患者院内死亡率更高(OR,4.78(95%CI:3.39 - 6.75),<0.001)、消化道出血发生率更高(OR,1.91(95%CI:1.83 - 1.99),<0.001,I = 0%)、卒中发生率更高(OR,2.48(95%CI:1.68 - 3.66),<0.001)、急性肾损伤发生率更高(OR,3.66(95%CI:2.33 - 6.02),<0.001)以及血管并发症发生率更高(OR,1.50(95%CI:1.13 - 1.98),<0.001)。与单纯PCI组患者相比,肝硬化患者PCI术后死亡和不良结局的风险更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57da/10059068/231fc5695f9f/jcdd-10-00092-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57da/10059068/578497259f3a/jcdd-10-00092-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57da/10059068/231fc5695f9f/jcdd-10-00092-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57da/10059068/578497259f3a/jcdd-10-00092-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57da/10059068/231fc5695f9f/jcdd-10-00092-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.肝硬化患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Feb 21;10(3):92. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10030092.
2
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干狭窄患者的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;2(10):1079-1088. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2895.
3
Sex Differences in Clinical Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.非保护左主干冠状动脉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后临床结局的性别差异:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2021 Jul;28:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.07.038. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
4
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in dialysis-dependent patients: A pooled meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术在依赖透析患者中的比较:重建时间事件数据的荟萃分析。
J Card Surg. 2022 Oct;37(10):3365-3373. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16805. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
5
Comparison by meta-analysis of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with a mean age of ≥70 years.对年龄均≥70 岁的患者进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的荟萃分析比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 1;112(5):615-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.04.034. Epub 2013 May 29.
6
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.冠状动脉血运重建术后卒率比较:外科手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071.
7
Percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病的比较?一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2017 Jun;35(3). doi: 10.1111/1755-5922.12260.
8
Percutaneous coronary intervention among patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a review and meta-analysis of 19 clinical studies.左心室收缩功能障碍患者的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:19项临床研究的综述与荟萃分析
Coron Artery Dis. 2012 Nov;23(7):469-79. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283587804.
9
Long-term follow-up of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in left main coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.左主干冠状动脉疾病患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期随访:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Sep;98(3):427-433. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29338. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
10
Minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention for single-vessel disease: a meta-analysis of 2885 patients.单支血管病变的微创直接冠状动脉搭桥术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对比:2885例患者的荟萃分析
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Mar;47(3):397-406; discussion 406. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu285. Epub 2014 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiac Evaluation in Liver Transplant Candidates.肝移植候选者的心脏评估
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2025 Sep-Oct;15(5):102554. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2025.102554. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
2
Management and outcomes of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and liver disease-Insights from the Nationwide Readmissions Database.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并肝病患者的管理与结局——来自全国再入院数据库的见解
Am Heart J Plus. 2025 Feb 22;52:100516. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2025.100516. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Successful Percutaneous Coronary Stenting in End-Stage Liver Disease Patients Awaiting Liver Transplantation.

本文引用的文献

1
Cardioprotective effects of influenza vaccination among patients with established cardiovascular disease or at high cardiovascular risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.流感疫苗对已患有心血管疾病或心血管疾病高危患者的心脏保护作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022 Oct 20;29(14):1881-1892. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwac152.
2
Hypovitaminosis D and cardiovascular outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.维生素D缺乏与心血管结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022 Apr 11;40:101019. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101019. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Safety and efficacy of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with end-stage liver disease.
等待肝移植的终末期肝病患者经皮冠状动脉支架置入术成功
Cureus. 2024 Dec 28;16(12):e76520. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76520. eCollection 2024 Dec.
终末期肝病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双重抗血小板治疗的安全性和有效性。
World J Cardiol. 2021 Nov 26;13(11):599-607. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v13.i11.599.
4
Comparison of Outcomes of Patients With Versus Without Chronic Liver Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.比较慢性肝病患者与非慢性肝病患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结局。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Oct 1;156:32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.06.044. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
5
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
6
Impact Of Cirrhosis On 90-Day Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (from A Nationwide Database).肝硬化对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后90天结局的影响(来自全国性数据库)
Am J Cardiol. 2020 May 1;125(9):1295-1304. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.01.052. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
7
Temporal trends in the utilization and outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with liver cirrhosis.肝硬化患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的利用和结局的时间趋势。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Oct 1;96(4):802-810. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28593. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
8
Temporal Changes in Co-Morbidity Burden in Patients Having Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Impact on Prognosis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者合并症负担的时间变化及其对预后的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Sep 1;122(5):712-722. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
9
Pathogenesis, prevention, and management of bleeding and thrombosis in patients with liver diseases.肝病患者出血与血栓形成的发病机制、预防及管理
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2017 Aug 5;1(2):150-161. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12028. eCollection 2017 Oct.
10
The growing burden of liver cirrhosis: implications for preventive measures.肝硬化负担日益加重:对预防措施的影响
Hepatol Int. 2018 May;12(3):201-203. doi: 10.1007/s12072-018-9865-y. Epub 2018 Apr 20.