Shen Liming, Wen Chao, Chen Xuan, Hua Yan, Du Chengju, Cai Jiacheng, Wen Xiujun, Wang Lei, Wang Cai
College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
School of Grassland Science, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.
Insects. 2023 Feb 23;14(3):219. doi: 10.3390/insects14030219.
Our previous study discovered that two urban pest ants, red imported fire ants, Buren (Formicidae: Myrmicinae), and ghost ants, (Fabricius) (Formicidae: Dolichoderinae), can pave viscose surfaces with particles to facilitate food search and transport. We hypothesize that this paving behavior can be applied to monitor and . In the present study, 3998 adhesive tapes, each with a food source (sausage), were placed in 20 locations around Guangzhou, China (181-224 tapes per location), and their efficiency to detect and was compared with two traditional ant-monitoring methods, baiting and pitfall trapping. Overall, was detected by 45.6% and 46.4% of baits and adhesive tapes, respectively. In each location, the percentage of adhesive tapes detecting and was similar when compared to baits and pitfall traps. However, significantly more non-target ant species showed up on bait and pitfall traps. Seven non-target ant species- Mayr (Formicidae: Myrmicinae), Smith (Formicidae: Myrmicinae), Wu & Wang (Formicidae: Myrmicinae), Forel (Formicidae: Myrmicinae), (Jerdon) (Formicidae: Myrmicinae), Mayr (Formicidae: Formicinae), and (Smith) (Formicidae: Ponerinae)-also showed tape paving behavior, but they can be easily distinguished morphologically from and . Our study showed that the paving behavior occurs in different subfamilies of ants (i.e., myrmicinae, dolichoderinae, formicinae, and ponerinae). In addition, paving behavior can potentially be used to develop more specific monitoring methods for and in urban areas in southern China.
我们之前的研究发现,两种城市害虫蚂蚁,即红火蚁,布伦(蚁科:切叶蚁亚科)和幽灵蚁,(法布尔)(蚁科:臭蚁亚科),可以用颗粒铺设粘性表面,以方便食物搜索和运输。我们假设这种铺设行为可用于监测和。在本研究中,3998条粘胶带,每条都带有食物源(香肠),被放置在中国广州的20个地点(每个地点181 - 224条胶带),并将它们检测和的效率与两种传统的蚂蚁监测方法,诱饵法和陷阱诱捕法进行比较。总体而言,分别有45.6%和46.4%的诱饵和粘胶带检测到了。在每个地点,与诱饵和陷阱诱捕法相比,检测到和的粘胶带百分比相似。然而,在诱饵和陷阱诱捕法上出现的非目标蚂蚁种类明显更多。七种非目标蚂蚁种类——迈尔(蚁科:切叶蚁亚科)、史密斯(蚁科:切叶蚁亚科)、吴 & 王(蚁科:切叶蚁亚科)、福尔(蚁科:切叶蚁亚科)、(杰登)(蚁科:切叶蚁亚科)、迈尔(蚁科:蚁亚科)和(史密斯)(蚁科:猛蚁亚科)——也表现出胶带铺设行为,但它们在形态上很容易与和区分开来。我们的研究表明,铺设行为发生在蚂蚁的不同亚科中(即切叶蚁亚科、臭蚁亚科、蚁亚科和猛蚁亚科)。此外,铺设行为有可能被用于为中国南方城市地区的和开发更具针对性的监测方法。