de Wilde Bram, Joosten Frank, Venderink Wulphert, Davidse Mirjam E J, Geurts Juliëtte, Kruijt Hanneke, Vermeulen Afke, Martens Bibi, Schyns Maxime V P, Huige Josephine C B M, de Boer Myrte C, Tonino Bart A R, Zandvoort Herman J A, Lammert Kirsti, Parviainen Helka, Vuorinen Aino-Maija, Syväranta Suvi, Vogels Ruben R M, Prins Wiesje, Coppola Andrea, Bossa Nancy, Ten Broek Richard P G, Huisman Henkjan
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiology, Rijnstate Hospital, 6883 AD Arnhem, The Netherlands.
J Imaging. 2023 Feb 23;9(3):55. doi: 10.3390/jimaging9030055.
Cine-MRI for adhesion detection is a promising novel modality that can help the large group of patients developing pain after abdominal surgery. Few studies into its diagnostic accuracy are available, and none address observer variability. This retrospective study explores the inter- and intra-observer variability, diagnostic accuracy, and the effect of experience. A total of 15 observers with a variety of experience reviewed 61 sagittal cine-MRI slices, placing box annotations with a confidence score at locations suspect for adhesions. Five observers reviewed the slices again one year later. Inter- and intra-observer variability are quantified using Fleiss' (inter) and Cohen's (intra) κ and percentage agreement. Diagnostic accuracy is quantified with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis based on a consensus standard. Inter-observer Fleiss' κ values range from 0.04 to 0.34, showing poor to fair agreement. High general and cine-MRI experience led to significantly ( < 0.001) better agreement among observers. The intra-observer results show Cohen's κ values between 0.37 and 0.53 for all observers, except one with a low κ of -0.11. Group AUC scores lie between 0.66 and 0.72, with individual observers reaching 0.78. This study confirms that cine-MRI can diagnose adhesions, with respect to a radiologist consensus panel and shows that experience improves reading cine-MRI. Observers without specific experience adapt to this modality quickly after a short online tutorial. Observer agreement is fair at best and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) scores leave room for improvement. Consistently interpreting this novel modality needs further research, for instance, by developing reporting guidelines or artificial intelligence-based methods.
用于粘连检测的电影磁共振成像(Cine-MRI)是一种很有前景的新型检查方法,可帮助大量腹部手术后出现疼痛的患者。目前关于其诊断准确性的研究较少,且均未涉及观察者间的变异性。这项回顾性研究探讨了观察者间和观察者内的变异性、诊断准确性以及经验的影响。共有15名经验各异的观察者对61张矢状位电影磁共振成像切片进行了评估,在怀疑有粘连的部位放置带有置信度评分的方框注释。其中5名观察者在一年后再次评估这些切片。观察者间和观察者内的变异性通过Fleiss(观察者间)和Cohen(观察者内)κ系数以及百分比一致性进行量化。诊断准确性基于共识标准通过接受者操作特征(ROC)分析进行量化。观察者间Fleiss'κ值范围为0.04至0.34,显示出从较差到一般的一致性。具有丰富普通和电影磁共振成像经验的观察者之间的一致性显著更好(<0.001)。观察者内结果显示,除一名κ系数较低为-0.11的观察者外,所有观察者的Cohen'sκ值在0.37至0.53之间。组AUC分数在0.66至0.72之间,个别观察者达到0.78。本研究证实,相对于放射科医生共识小组,电影磁共振成像能够诊断粘连,并且表明经验可提高对电影磁共振成像的解读能力。没有特定经验的观察者在经过简短的在线教程后能很快适应这种检查方法。观察者间的一致性充其量只是一般,接受者操作特征曲线(AUC)分数仍有改进空间。持续解读这种新型检查方法需要进一步研究,例如制定报告指南或基于人工智能的方法。