Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan.
Department of Breast Imaging and Breast Interventional Radiology, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Suntogun Nagaizumicho, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.
Breast Cancer. 2024 Jul;31(4):671-683. doi: 10.1007/s12282-024-01580-8. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
Visual assessment of mammographic breast composition remains the most common worldwide, although subjective variability limits its reproducibility. This study aimed to investigate the inter- and intra-observer variability in qualitative visual assessment of mammographic breast composition through a multi-institutional observer performance study for the first time in Japan.
This study enrolled 10 Japanese physicians from five different institutions. They used the new Japanese breast-composition classification system 4th edition to subjectively evaluate the breast composition in 200 pairs of right and left normal mediolateral oblique mammograms (number determined using precise sample size calculations) twice, with a 1-month interval (median patient age: 59 years [range 40-69 years]). The primary endpoint of this study was the inter-observer variability using kappa (κ) value.
Inter-observer variability for the four and two classes of breast-composition assessment revealed moderate agreement (Fleiss' κ: first and second reading = 0.553 and 0.587, respectively) and substantial agreement (Fleiss' κ: first and second reading = 0.689 and 0.70, respectively). Intra-observer variability for the four and two classes of breast-composition assessment demonstrated substantial agreement (Cohen's κ, median = 0.758) and almost perfect agreement (Cohen's κ, median = 0.813). Assessments of consensus between the 10 physicians and the automated software Volpara® revealed slight agreement (Cohen's κ; first and second reading: 0.104 and 0.075, respectively).
Qualitative visual assessment of mammographic breast composition using the new Japanese classification revealed excellent intra-observer reproducibility. However, persistent inter-observer variability, presenting a challenge in establishing it as the gold standard in Japan.
尽管视觉评估乳腺组织的主观变异性限制了其可重复性,但乳腺组织的影像学评估仍然是全球最常用的方法。本研究旨在首次在日本通过多机构观察者表现研究,调查新的日本乳腺组织分类系统第四版对乳腺组织影像学评估的定性视觉评估的观察者内和观察者间的可变性。
本研究纳入了来自五家不同机构的 10 名日本医生。他们使用新的日本乳腺组织分类系统第四版,对 200 对右和左斜位侧位乳腺钼靶片(根据精确样本量计算确定的数量)的乳腺组织进行两次主观评估,两次评估之间间隔 1 个月(中位患者年龄为 59 岁[范围为 40-69 岁])。本研究的主要终点是使用 κ 值评估观察者间的可变性。
对乳腺组织四个和两个类别的评估的观察者间的可变性显示出中度一致性(Fleiss' κ:第一次和第二次阅读分别为 0.553 和 0.587)和高度一致性(Fleiss' κ:第一次和第二次阅读分别为 0.689 和 0.70)。对乳腺组织四个和两个类别的评估的观察者内的可变性显示出高度一致性(Cohen's κ,中位数=0.758)和几乎完美一致(Cohen's κ,中位数=0.813)。10 名医生和自动软件 Volpara®之间的评估一致性显示出轻度一致(Cohen's κ;第一次和第二次阅读分别为 0.104 和 0.075)。
使用新的日本分类系统对乳腺组织进行定性视觉评估显示出极好的观察者内可重复性。然而,观察者间的可变性仍然存在,这在日本成为金标准方面提出了挑战。