• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与总体急诊人群相比,急诊医学标本库参与者的特征。

Characteristics of Emergency Medicine Specimen Bank Participants Compared to the Overall Emergency Department Population.

机构信息

University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.

University of Colorado, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, Colorado.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2023 Feb 25;24(2):312-321. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.11.57981.

DOI:10.5811/westjem.2022.11.57981
PMID:36976586
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10047721/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Biorepositories lack diversity both demographically and with regard to the clinical complaints of patients enrolled. The Emergency Medicine Specimen Bank (EMSB) seeks to enroll a diverse cohort of patients for discovery research in acute care conditions. Our objective in this study was to determine the differences in demographics and clinical complaints between participants in the EMSB and the overall emergency department (ED) population.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of participants of the EMSB and the entire UCHealth at University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center (UCHealth AMC) ED population across three periods: peri-EMSB; post-EMSB; and COVID-19. We compared patients consented to the EMSB to the entire ED population to determine differences in age, gender, ethnicity, race, clinical complaints, and severity of illness. We used chi-square tests to compare categorical variables and the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index to determine differences in the severity of illness between the groups.

RESULTS

Between February 5, 2018-January 29, 2022, there were 141,670 consented encounters in the EMSB, representing 40,740 unique patients and over 13,000 blood samples collected. In that same time, the ED saw approximately 188,402 unique patients for 387,590 encounters. The EMSB had significantly higher rates of participation from the following: patients 18-59 years old (80.3% vs 77.7%); White patients (52.3% vs 47.8%), and women (54.8% vs 51.1%) compared to the overall ED population. The EMSB had lower rates of participation from patients ≥70 years, Hispanic patients, Asian patients, and men. The EMSB population had higher mean comorbidity scores. During the six months after Colorado's first COVID-19 case, the rate of consented patients and samples collected increased. The odds of consent during the COVID-19 study period were 1.32 (95% CI 1.26-1.39), and the odds of sample capture were 2.19 (95% CI 2.0-2.41).

CONCLUSION

The EMSB is representative of the overall ED population for most demographics and clinical complaints.

摘要

简介

生物库在人口统计学方面以及所纳入患者的临床症状方面都存在多样性缺乏的问题。急诊医学标本库(EMSB)旨在为急性护理条件下的发现研究招募多样化的患者群体。我们在这项研究中的目标是确定 EMSB 参与者与整个急诊部(ED)人群在人口统计学和临床症状方面的差异。

方法

这是对 EMSB 参与者和整个科罗拉多大学安舒茨医疗中心(UCHealth AMC)ED 人群在三个时期内的回顾性分析:EMSB 前;EMSB 后;和 COVID-19 时期。我们将同意参加 EMSB 的患者与整个 ED 人群进行比较,以确定年龄、性别、族裔、种族、临床症状和疾病严重程度方面的差异。我们使用卡方检验比较分类变量,使用 Elixhauser 合并症指数确定两组之间疾病严重程度的差异。

结果

在 2018 年 2 月 5 日至 2022 年 1 月 29 日期间,EMSB 中有 141670 次同意参与,代表 40740 名独特患者和超过 13000 个血液样本的采集。在同一时间内,ED 大约有 188402 名独特患者进行了 387590 次就诊。EMSB 参与者中 18-59 岁的患者比例(80.3%比 77.7%)、白人患者(52.3%比 47.8%)和女性(54.8%比 51.1%)明显高于整个 ED 人群。EMSB 参与者中≥70 岁的患者、西班牙裔患者、亚裔患者和男性的比例较低。EMSB 人群的平均合并症评分较高。在科罗拉多州首例 COVID-19 病例后的六个月内,同意参与的患者和采集的样本数量增加。COVID-19 研究期间同意的几率为 1.32(95%CI 1.26-1.39),样本采集的几率为 2.19(95%CI 2.0-2.41)。

结论

EMSB 在大多数人口统计学和临床症状方面代表了整个 ED 人群。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/10047721/8717b5e9986f/wjem-24-312-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/10047721/1c58695a8c24/wjem-24-312-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/10047721/afc27d6b5a77/wjem-24-312-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/10047721/9facd4b3e32f/wjem-24-312-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/10047721/8717b5e9986f/wjem-24-312-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/10047721/1c58695a8c24/wjem-24-312-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/10047721/afc27d6b5a77/wjem-24-312-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/10047721/9facd4b3e32f/wjem-24-312-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f73f/10047721/8717b5e9986f/wjem-24-312-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Characteristics of Emergency Medicine Specimen Bank Participants Compared to the Overall Emergency Department Population.与总体急诊人群相比,急诊医学标本库参与者的特征。
West J Emerg Med. 2023 Feb 25;24(2):312-321. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.11.57981.
2
The Emergency Medicine Specimen Bank: An Innovative Approach To Biobanking In Acute Care.急诊医学标本库:急性护理中生物库的创新方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;26(6):639-647. doi: 10.1111/acem.13620. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
3
Are patients with longer emergency department wait times less likely to consent to research?患者在急诊部门等待的时间越长,是否越不愿意同意参与研究?
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;19(4):396-401. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01310.x.
4
Population-Level Trends in Emergency Department Encounters for Sexual Assault Preceding and During the COVID-19 Pandemic Across Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省 COVID-19 大流行前后,急诊部门性侵相关就诊的人群趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Dec 1;5(12):e2248972. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.48972.
5
Association of Race/Ethnicity With Emergency Department Destination of Emergency Medical Services Transport.种族/民族与紧急医疗服务转运的急诊科去向的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1910816. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10816.
6
Patient Sociodemographics and Comorbidities and Birth Hospital Characteristics Associated With Postpartum Emergency Department Care.患者人口统计学特征和合并症以及分娩医院特征与产后急诊科护理相关。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e233927. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.3927.
7
Factors Associated With Voluntary Refusal of Emergency Medical System Transport for Emergency Care in Detroit During the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic.与 COVID-19 大流行早期底特律紧急医疗系统自愿拒绝紧急护理转运相关的因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2120728. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.20728.
8
Investigating demographic differences in patients' decisions to consent to COVID-19 research.调查患者同意 COVID-19 研究的决定中的人口统计学差异。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023 Dec;36(1):2148097. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2022.2148097.
9
Clinical characteristics and management of COVID-19 patients accessing the emergency department in a hospital in Northern Italy in March and April 2020.2020 年 3 月至 4 月意大利北部一家医院急诊科就诊的 COVID-19 患者的临床特征和管理。
Epidemiol Prev. 2020 Sep-Dec;44(5-6 Suppl 2):208-215. doi: 10.19191/EP20.5-6.S2.120.
10
The Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Outbreak on the Attendance of Patients with Surgical Complaints at a Tertiary Hospital Emergency Department.2019年冠状病毒病疫情对一家三级医院急诊科外科主诉患者就诊率的影响
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Sep;30(9):1001-1007. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0465. Epub 2020 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Nanoparticle-Binding Immunoglobulins Predict Variable Complement Responses in Healthy and Diseased Cohorts.纳米粒子结合免疫球蛋白可预测健康和患病队列中补体反应的可变性。
ACS Nano. 2024 Oct 22;18(42):28649-28658. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c05087. Epub 2024 Oct 12.
2
Validation of dot blot immunoassay for measurement of complement opsonization of nanoparticles.斑点印迹免疫分析法测定纳米粒子补体调理作用的验证。
J Immunol Methods. 2024 May;528:113668. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2024.113668. Epub 2024 Apr 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Specialized interferon action in COVID-19.新冠病毒中的干扰素作用机制。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Mar 15;119(11). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2116730119.
2
Host methylation predicts SARS-CoV-2 infection and clinical outcome.宿主甲基化可预测新冠病毒感染及临床结局。
Commun Med (Lond). 2021;1(1):42. doi: 10.1038/s43856-021-00042-y. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
3
Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Guideline for CYP2C19 Genotype and Clopidogrel Therapy: 2022 Update.临床药物遗传学实施联盟 CYP2C19 基因型和氯吡格雷治疗指南:2022 更新版。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Nov;112(5):959-967. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2526. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
4
Acceptability of Research and Health Care Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Survey Study.COVID-19大流行期间研究和医疗保健就诊的可接受性:横断面调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Jun 2;5(6):e27185. doi: 10.2196/27185.
5
Diversity and inclusion for the All of Us research program: A scoping review.《全民研究计划的多样性和包容性:范围综述》。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 1;15(7):e0234962. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234962. eCollection 2020.
6
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Emergency Department Visits - United States, January 1, 2019-May 30, 2020.COVID-19 大流行对急诊就诊的影响-美国,2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 5 月 30 日。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Jun 12;69(23):699-704. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6923e1.
7
Personalized Medicine and the Power of Electronic Health Records.个性化医学与电子健康记录的力量。
Cell. 2019 Mar 21;177(1):58-69. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.039.
8
Characteristics and Trends of Emergency Department Visits in the United States (2010-2014).美国急诊科就诊情况的特征与趋势(2010 - 2014年)
J Emerg Med. 2019 Mar;56(3):344-351. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.12.025. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
9
Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guideline for the Use of Potent Volatile Anesthetic Agents and Succinylcholine in the Context of RYR1 or CACNA1S Genotypes.临床药物遗传学实施联盟(CPIC)关于 RYR1 或 CACNA1S 基因型背景下使用强效挥发性麻醉剂和琥珀酰胆碱的指南。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Jun;105(6):1338-1344. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1319. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
10
The Emergency Medicine Specimen Bank: An Innovative Approach To Biobanking In Acute Care.急诊医学标本库:急性护理中生物库的创新方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;26(6):639-647. doi: 10.1111/acem.13620. Epub 2018 Oct 25.