• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体在选择性注意和参与方面的差异塑造了学生在在线课程中从视觉线索和教师存在中学习的方式。

Individual differences in selective attention and engagement shape students' learning from visual cues and instructor presence during online lessons.

机构信息

Neuroscience Program, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, 70118, USA.

Tulane Brain Institute, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, 70118, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 28;13(1):5075. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32069-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-32069-7
PMID:36977822
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10047463/
Abstract

Although some researchers recommend minimizing extraneous visual information in multimedia lessons, others have demonstrated that features such as visual cues and instructor videos can enhance learning. However, variability in selective attention skills may influence students' ability to benefit from these additional features. This study investigated links between college students' selective attention skills and their learning from video lessons that varied in the use of visual cues and the instructor video. Learning outcomes depended on both the visual features available and students' effort and selective attention skills. Among students who reported increased effort during the lessons, those with more efficient selective attention benefited most when a single additional feature (i.e., either visual cues or the instructor video) was used. All students, regardless of attention skills, benefited when both visual cues and the instructor were combined. These findings suggest that learning during multimedia lessons may depend on the visual features of the lessons and the student's effort and attention skills.

摘要

尽管一些研究人员建议在多媒体课程中尽量减少无关的视觉信息,但也有研究表明,视觉提示和教师视频等功能可以增强学习效果。然而,选择性注意技能的差异可能会影响学生从这些附加功能中受益的能力。本研究调查了大学生选择性注意技能与他们从使用视觉提示和教师视频的视频课程中学习之间的联系。学习成果取决于可用的视觉特征以及学生的努力和选择性注意技能。在报告课程中增加努力的学生中,当仅使用一个额外的功能(即视觉提示或教师视频)时,具有更高效率选择性注意技能的学生受益最大。无论注意力技能如何,当同时使用视觉提示和教师时,所有学生都受益。这些发现表明,多媒体课程中的学习可能取决于课程的视觉特征以及学生的努力和注意力技能。

相似文献

1
Individual differences in selective attention and engagement shape students' learning from visual cues and instructor presence during online lessons.个体在选择性注意和参与方面的差异塑造了学生在在线课程中从视觉线索和教师存在中学习的方式。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 28;13(1):5075. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32069-7.
2
Onscreen presence of instructors in video lectures affects learners' neural synchrony and visual attention during multimedia learning.视频讲座中教师的屏幕呈现会影响学习者在多媒体学习过程中的神经同步性和视觉注意力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Mar 19;121(12):e2309054121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2309054121. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
3
Impact of Different Styles of Online Course Videos on Students' Attention During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间不同风格的在线课程视频对学生注意力的影响。
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 8;10:858780. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.858780. eCollection 2022.
4
Increasing the realism of on-screen embodied instructors creates more looking but less learning.增加屏幕上虚拟教师的真实感会使观看次数增多,但学习效果却变差。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2024 Sep;94(3):759-776. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12677. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
5
Examination of medical students' opinions on multimedia learning materials according to social cues: focusing on sound principles.根据社会线索审视医学生对多媒体学习材料的看法:聚焦合理原则。
Korean J Med Educ. 2024 Mar;36(1):105-110. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2024.288. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
6
Using web log analysis to evaluate healthcare students' engagement behaviours with multimedia lectures on YouTube.利用网络日志分析评估医学生对 YouTube 上多媒体讲座的参与行为。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 14;18(4):e0284133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284133. eCollection 2023.
7
Would It Be Better if Instructors Technically Adjust Their Image or Voice in Online Courses? Impact of the Way of Instructor Presence on Online Learning.如果教师在在线课程中对自己的形象或声音进行技术调整会更好吗?教师呈现方式对在线学习的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 21;12:746857. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.746857. eCollection 2021.
8
Relationship between medical students' perceived instructor role and their approaches to using online learning technologies in a cloud-based virtual classroom.医学生对教师角色的感知与他们在基于云的虚拟教室中使用在线学习技术的方法之间的关系。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jul 19;22(1):560. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03604-3.
9
Application of Multimedia Networks in Business English Teaching in Vocational College.多媒体网络在高职院校商务英语教学中的应用。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Apr 29;2021:5519472. doi: 10.1155/2021/5519472. eCollection 2021.
10
Five Strategies for Optimizing Instructional Materials: Instructor- and Learner-Managed Cognitive Load.优化教学材料的五种策略:教师和学习者管理的认知负荷
Educ Psychol Rev. 2021;33(4):1379-1407. doi: 10.1007/s10648-021-09606-9. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual and cognitive processes contribute to age-related improvements in visual selective attention.视觉和认知过程有助于与年龄相关的视觉选择性注意改善。
Child Dev. 2024 Mar-Apr;95(2):391-408. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13992. Epub 2023 Aug 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Selective attention to lesson-relevant contextual information promotes 3- to 5-year-old children's learning.选择性注意与课程相关的上下文信息可促进 3 至 5 岁儿童的学习。
Dev Sci. 2022 Jul;25(4):e13237. doi: 10.1111/desc.13237. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
2
Twelve tips to enhance student engagement in synchronous online teaching and learning.增强学生在同步在线教学与学习中的参与度的 12 个技巧。
Med Teach. 2022 Jun;44(6):601-606. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1912310. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
3
The Influence of Video Format on Engagement and Performance in Online Learning.
视频格式对在线学习中的参与度和表现的影响。
Brain Sci. 2021 Jan 20;11(2):128. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11020128.
4
Visual Selection: Usually Fast and Automatic; Seldom Slow and Volitional.视觉选择:通常快速且自动;很少缓慢且出于意志。
J Cogn. 2018 May 14;1(1):29. doi: 10.5334/joc.13.
5
PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy.心理物理学 2 版:简单易用的行为实验。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):195-203. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y.
6
Getting a grip on cognitive flexibility.掌握认知灵活性。
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2018 Dec;27(6):470-476. doi: 10.1177/0963721418787475. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
7
Computer Games in Education.电脑游戏在教育中的应用。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:531-549. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102744. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
8
How cognitive engagement fluctuates during a team-based learning session and how it predicts academic achievement.认知投入在团队学习过程中的波动情况,以及它如何预测学业成绩。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018 May;23(2):339-351. doi: 10.1007/s10459-017-9801-2. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
9
The more total cognitive load is reduced by cues, the better retention and transfer of multimedia learning: A meta-analysis and two meta-regression analyses.线索减少的总体认知负荷越多,多媒体学习的记忆和迁移效果就越好:一项元分析和两项元回归分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 30;12(8):e0183884. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183884. eCollection 2017.
10
Spatiotemporal oscillatory dynamics of visual selective attention during a flanker task.侧翼任务期间视觉选择性注意的时空振荡动力学
Neuroimage. 2017 Aug 1;156:277-285. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 May 10.