• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮肾镜碎石取石术后肾盂内流体静压作为一种无辐射的替代荧光透视尿路造影的方法。

Hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram following percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, Heusnerstrasse 40, 42283, Wuppertal, Germany.

Department of Radiology, St. Franziskus-Hospital Münster, 48145, Münster, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Urol. 2023 Mar 28;23(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01225-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12894-023-01225-6
PMID:36978025
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10052835/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis (RPP) as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram to assess ureteral patency after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

METHODS

Retrospective non-inferiority study analyzing 248 PCNL-patients (86 female (35%) and 162 males (65%)) between 2007 and 2015. Postoperatively, RPP was measured using a central venous pressure manometer in cmHO. The primary endpoint was to assess RPP depending on the patency of the ureter and the nephrostomy tube removal. Secondary, the upper limit of normal RPP of [Formula: see text] 20 cmHO was assessed as an indicator of an unobstructed patency.

RESULTS

The median procedure duration was 141 min (112-171.5) with a stone free rate of 82% (n = 202). RPP was significantly higher in patients with obstructive nephrostogram with 25.0 mmHO (21.0-32.0) versus 20.0 mmHO (16.0-24.0; p < 0.001). The pressure was lower in successful nephrostomy removal with 18 cmHO (15-21) versus 23 cmHO (20-29) in the leakage group (p < 0.001). The analysis of a cut-off of [Formula: see text] 20 cmHO showed a sensitivity of 76.9% (95% CI [60.7%; 88.9%]) and a specificity of 61.5% (95% CI [54.6%; 68.2%]). The negative predictive value was 93.4% (95% CI: [87.9%; 97.0%]) and the positive predictive value 27.3% (95% CI [19.2%; 36.6%]). The accuracy of the model showed an AUC = 0.795 (95% CI [0.668; 0.862]).

CONCLUSION

The hydrostatic RPP seems to allow a bedside evaluation of ureteral patency after PCNL.

摘要

背景

我们评估了肾盂静水压力(RPP)作为一种无辐射的替代荧光透视尿路造影术的方法,以评估经皮肾镜碎石取石术(PCNL)后输尿管通畅情况。

方法

这是一项回顾性非劣效性研究,分析了 2007 年至 2015 年间 248 例接受 PCNL 治疗的患者(86 名女性(35%)和 162 名男性(65%))。术后,使用中心静脉压测压计以 cmHO 为单位测量 RPP。主要终点是根据输尿管通畅情况和肾造瘘管的去除情况评估 RPP。其次,评估[Formula: see text]20 cmHO 的正常 RPP 上限作为无阻塞通畅的指标。

结果

中位手术时间为 141 分钟(112-171.5),结石清除率为 82%(n=202)。在梗阻性尿路造影中,RPP 明显较高,为 25.0 mmHO(21.0-32.0)与 20.0 mmHO(16.0-24.0;p<0.001)。在成功去除肾造瘘管的情况下,压力较低,为 18 cmHO(15-21)与漏液组的 23 cmHO(20-29)相比(p<0.001)。分析[Formula: see text]20 cmHO 的截断值显示,敏感性为 76.9%(95%CI[60.7%;88.9%]),特异性为 61.5%(95%CI[54.6%;68.2%])。阴性预测值为 93.4%(95%CI:[87.9%;97.0%]),阳性预测值为 27.3%(95%CI[19.2%;36.6%])。模型的准确性显示 AUC 为 0.795(95%CI[0.668;0.862])。

结论

RPP 似乎可以在 PCNL 后进行床边评估输尿管通畅情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e60/10052835/f84645d10e9d/12894_2023_1225_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e60/10052835/3dbe351c8b62/12894_2023_1225_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e60/10052835/b0b2506eaf37/12894_2023_1225_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e60/10052835/f84645d10e9d/12894_2023_1225_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e60/10052835/3dbe351c8b62/12894_2023_1225_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e60/10052835/b0b2506eaf37/12894_2023_1225_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e60/10052835/f84645d10e9d/12894_2023_1225_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Hydrostatic pressure of the renal pelvis as a radiation-free alternative to fluoroscopic nephrostogram following percutaneous nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜碎石取石术后肾盂内流体静压作为一种无辐射的替代荧光透视尿路造影的方法。
BMC Urol. 2023 Mar 28;23(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01225-6.
2
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound as a Radiation-Free Alternative to Fluoroscopic Nephrostogram for Evaluating Ureteral Patency.对比增强超声作为一种无辐射的替代荧光透视尿路造影术的方法,用于评估输尿管通畅性。
J Urol. 2017 Dec;198(6):1367-1373. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.07.074. Epub 2017 Jul 23.
3
Safety and Effectiveness of Externalized Ureteral Catheter in Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.外置输尿管导管在无管经皮肾镜取石术中的安全性和有效性
Urol J. 2019 Aug 17;17(5):456-461. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.5280.
4
Renal Pelvic Pressure in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: The Effect of Multiple Tracts.经皮肾镜取石术中肾盂压力:多通道的影响。
J Endourol. 2017 Oct;31(10):1079-1083. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0298. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
5
The influence of ureteral stent on renal pelvic pressure in vivo.输尿管支架对体内肾盂压力的影响。
Urol Res. 2009 Aug;37(4):221-5. doi: 10.1007/s00240-009-0199-z. Epub 2009 Jun 10.
6
Comparison of renal pelvic pressure and postoperative fever incidence between standard- and mini-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy.标准通道与微通道经皮肾镜取石术肾盂压力及术后发热发生率的比较
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2017 Jan;33(1):36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2016.10.012. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
7
A Novel Technique to Intelligently Monitor and Control Renal Pelvic Pressure during Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.一种在微创经皮肾镜取石术中智能监测和控制肾盂压力的新技术。
Urol Int. 2019;103(3):331-336. doi: 10.1159/000501047. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
8
Determinants of ureteral obstruction after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜碎石取石术后输尿管梗阻的决定因素。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Dec;50(6):759-764. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01365-8. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
9
A Novel Flexible Ureteroscopy with Intelligent Control of Renal Pelvic Pressure: An Initial Experience of 93 Cases.一种新型的可智能控制肾盂压力的柔性输尿管镜:93例初步经验
J Endourol. 2016 Oct;30(10):1067-1072. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0770. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
10
Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery with Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Large Stones in Patients with a Solitary Kidney.倾向评分匹配分析:比较逆行性肾内手术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗孤立肾患者的大结石
J Endourol. 2018 Mar;32(3):198-204. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0482.

本文引用的文献

1
Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in the prone split-leg position versus Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position for the management of partial staghorn calculi.经皮肾镜取石术在俯卧分腿位与改良后 Galdakao 仰卧位(Valdivia 位)治疗鹿角状肾结石的对比研究。
BMC Urol. 2022 Oct 20;22(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01115-3.
2
Is endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery ready for primetime in endourology? Outcomes from a systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜联合肾内手术在内窥镜泌尿外科领域是否已准备好迎接黄金时代?一项系统评价与荟萃分析的结果
Cent European J Urol. 2022;75(2):171-181. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2022.0049. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
3
The Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery (ECIRS) versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
内镜联合肾内手术(ECIRS)与经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)的安全性和有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Adv Urol. 2022 Jul 18;2022:1716554. doi: 10.1155/2022/1716554. eCollection 2022.
4
Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Large and Complex Renal Stone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.内镜下联合肾脏内手术与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗大体积复杂肾结石:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Endourol. 2022 Jul;36(7):865-876. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0761. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
5
Mini Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Management of Renal Stone Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.微创经皮肾镜取石术与标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Sep;8(5):1376-1385. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.07.014. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
6
A comparative study of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) in the galdakao-modified supine valdivia (GMSV) position and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex nephrolithiasis: a retrospective single-center study.经皮肾镜取石术与改良斜仰卧位下经皮肾镜碎石术治疗复杂性肾结石的对比研究:一项回顾性单中心研究
Urolithiasis. 2021 Apr;49(2):161-166. doi: 10.1007/s00240-020-01207-5. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
7
Impact of Implementing Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Antegrade Nephrostogram After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜取石术后实施超声造影顺行肾盂造影的影响
J Ultrasound Med. 2021 Jan;40(1):101-111. doi: 10.1002/jum.15380. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
8
Comparison of stone-free rates following shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较冲击波碎石术、经皮肾镜取石术和逆行性肾内手术治疗肾结石的无石率:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 21;14(2):e0211316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211316. eCollection 2019.
9
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) nephrostogram: utility and accuracy as an alternative to fluoroscopic imaging of the urinary tract.超声造影尿路造影:作为尿路造影的替代方法的实用性和准确性。
Clin Radiol. 2019 Feb;74(2):167.e9-167.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
10
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound as a Radiation-Free Alternative to Fluoroscopic Nephrostogram for Evaluating Ureteral Patency.对比增强超声作为一种无辐射的替代荧光透视尿路造影术的方法,用于评估输尿管通畅性。
J Urol. 2017 Dec;198(6):1367-1373. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.07.074. Epub 2017 Jul 23.