• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

核酸扩增检测对感染患者临床结局的影响

Impact of Nucleic Acid Amplification Test on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Infection.

作者信息

Yamada Yota, Miyazaki Motoyasu, Kushima Hisako, Komiya Yukie, Nakashima Akio, Ishii Hiroshi, Imakyure Osamu

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Fukuoka 818-8502, Japan.

Department of Infection Control and Prevention, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Fukuoka 818-8502, Japan.

出版信息

Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Feb 21;12(3):428. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12030428.

DOI:10.3390/antibiotics12030428
PMID:36978295
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10044602/
Abstract

A nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) is recommended to determine whether or not patients have a infection (CDI) when the glutamate dehydrogenase activity assay is positive and the rapid membrane enzyme immunoassays for toxins is negative. In our hospital, a NAAT was introduced to diagnose CDI precisely in April 2020. This study aimed to investigate the impact of a NAAT on the clinical outcomes in patients with CDI at our hospital. Seventy-one patients diagnosed with CDI between April 2017 and March 2022 were included in our study. Patients with CDI were divided into two groups: before (pre-NAAT) and after (post-NAAT) the introduction of NAAT. The clinical outcome was compared between the two groups. Of the 71 patients with CDI, 41 were sorted into the pre-NAAT group and 30 into the post-NAAT group. The clinical cure rate was significantly higher in the post-NAAT group compared to the pre-NAAT group (76.7% vs. 48.8%, = 0.018). In the multivariable analysis, the clinical cure was significantly associated with the introduction of NAAT ( = 0.022). Our findings suggest that the introduction of NAAT can improve the clinical outcomes in CDI patients.

摘要

当谷氨酸脱氢酶活性检测呈阳性且毒素快速膜酶免疫检测呈阴性时,建议进行核酸扩增试验(NAAT)以确定患者是否患有艰难梭菌感染(CDI)。2020年4月,我院引入了NAAT以准确诊断CDI。本研究旨在调查NAAT对我院CDI患者临床结局的影响。2017年4月至2022年3月期间诊断为CDI的71例患者纳入本研究。CDI患者分为两组:NAAT引入前(NAAT前)和引入后(NAAT后)。比较两组的临床结局。在71例CDI患者中,41例被归入NAAT前组,30例被归入NAAT后组。NAAT后组的临床治愈率显著高于NAAT前组(76.7%对48.8%,P = 0.018)。在多变量分析中,临床治愈与NAAT的引入显著相关(P = 0.022)。我们的研究结果表明,NAAT的引入可以改善CDI患者的临床结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78e6/10044602/6347b1effe9b/antibiotics-12-00428-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78e6/10044602/6347b1effe9b/antibiotics-12-00428-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78e6/10044602/6347b1effe9b/antibiotics-12-00428-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Nucleic Acid Amplification Test on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Infection.核酸扩增检测对感染患者临床结局的影响
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Feb 21;12(3):428. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12030428.
2
Toxin Enzyme Immunoassays Detect Clostridioides difficile Infection With Greater Severity and Higher Recurrence Rates.毒素酶免疫测定法检测艰难梭菌感染的严重程度更高,复发率更高。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 30;69(10):1667-1674. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz009.
3
Clinical Outcomes and Management of NAAT-Positive/Toxin-Negative Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.NAAT 阳性/毒素阴性艰难梭菌感染的临床结局和管理:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Feb 17;78(2):430-438. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad523.
4
Increased Clinical Specificity with Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridioides difficile Toxins: Reduction of Overdiagnosis Compared to Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests.超敏检测艰难梭菌毒素可提高临床特异性:与核酸扩增检测相比,减少过度诊断。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Oct 23;57(11). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00945-19. Print 2019 Nov.
5
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Four Common Diagnostic Methods for Clostridioides difficile Infection.艰难梭菌感染四种常见诊断方法的成本效益分析
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Apr;35(4):1102-1110. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05487-5. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
6
Host Immune Markers Distinguish Clostridioides difficile Infection From Asymptomatic Carriage and Non-C. difficile Diarrhea.宿主免疫标志物可区分艰难梭菌感染与无症状携带和非艰难梭菌性腹泻。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 3;70(6):1083-1093. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz330.
7
Potential underreporting of treated patients using a testing algorithm that screens with a nucleic acid amplification test.使用一种通过核酸扩增试验进行筛查的检测算法,可能会导致治疗患者的漏报。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 May;45(5):590-598. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.262. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
8
Budget Impact Analysis of Adopting a One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing (NAAT) Alone Diagnostic Pathway for in Japan Compared to a Two-Step Algorithm with Glutamate Dehydrogenase/Toxin Followed by NAAT.与采用谷氨酸脱氢酶/毒素两步法后再进行核酸扩增检测(NAAT)的算法相比,日本采用单一核酸扩增检测(NAAT)诊断途径的预算影响分析。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Apr 18;13(8):1463. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13081463.
9
Comparison of Clostridioides difficile Stool Toxin Concentrations in Adults With Symptomatic Infection and Asymptomatic Carriage Using an Ultrasensitive Quantitative Immunoassay.采用超敏定量免疫法比较有症状感染和无症状携带的成人艰难梭菌粪便毒素浓度。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Jan 1;68(1):78-86. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy415.
10
Performance of laboratory tests for detection for Clostridioides difficile: A multicenter prospective study in Japan.实验室检测用于检测艰难梭菌的性能:日本的一项多中心前瞻性研究。
Anaerobe. 2019 Dec;60:102107. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2019.102107. Epub 2019 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Emerging Diagnostics in Infection.感染病学中的新兴诊断技术
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Aug 8;25(16):8672. doi: 10.3390/ijms25168672.

本文引用的文献

1
Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection.艰难梭菌感染管理的日本临床实践指南。
J Infect Chemother. 2022 Aug;28(8):1045-1083. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.12.011. Epub 2022 May 24.
2
Association between disease severity according to "MN criteria" and 30-day mortality in patients with Clostridioides difficile infection.根据“MN 标准”评估的疾病严重程度与艰难梭菌感染患者 30 天死亡率之间的关系。
J Infect Chemother. 2022 Jun;28(6):757-761. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2022.02.014. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
3
Prognostic factors for severe and recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: a systematic review.
严重且复发艰难梭菌感染的预后因素:系统评价。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022 Mar;28(3):321-331. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.09.026. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
4
Predictors of in-hospital mortality among patients with clostridium difficile infection: a multicenter study.艰难梭菌感染患者住院死亡率的预测因素:一项多中心研究。
Minerva Med. 2021 Feb;112(1):124-129. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4806.20.07139-6. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
5
Laboratory Tests for the Diagnosis of .用于诊断……的实验室检测
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2020 Mar;33(2):73-81. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3400476. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
6
Evolving Epidemiology of IBD.炎症性肠病不断演变的流行病学
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2019 Jul 23;21(8):40. doi: 10.1007/s11894-019-0705-6.
7
Clostridium difficile infection: review.艰难梭菌感染:综述。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Jul;38(7):1211-1221. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03539-6. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
8
Toxin Enzyme Immunoassays Detect Clostridioides difficile Infection With Greater Severity and Higher Recurrence Rates.毒素酶免疫测定法检测艰难梭菌感染的严重程度更高,复发率更高。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 30;69(10):1667-1674. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz009.
9
Healthcare burden of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection in Japan: A retrospective database study.日本复发性艰难梭菌感染的医疗负担:一项回顾性数据库研究。
J Infect Chemother. 2018 Nov;24(11):892-901. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2018.07.020. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
10
fecal toxin level is associated with disease severity and prognosis.粪便毒素水平与疾病严重程度及预后相关。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Jun;6(5):773-780. doi: 10.1177/2050640617750809. Epub 2017 Dec 21.