Suppr超能文献

平面磁刺激治疗压力性尿失禁:一项前瞻性对照研究。

Flat Magnetic Stimulation for Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Prospective Comparison Study.

作者信息

Frigerio Matteo, Barba Marta, Cola Alice, Marino Giuseppe, Volontè Silvia, Melocchi Tomaso, De Vicari Desirèe, Maruccia Serena

机构信息

Department of Gynecology, ASST Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, 20900 Monza, Italy.

Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Feb 26;10(3):295. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10030295.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Flat Magnetic Stimulation (FMS) is characterized by a stimulation generated by electromagnetic fields with a homogenous profile. One possible application is the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We aimed to compare the objective, subjective, quality of life, and instrumental outcomes in women with SUI not eligible for surgery undergoing either FMS or pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT).

METHODS

This was a prospective interventional study. After proper counseling, patients with isolated SUI were divided according to their treatment of choice into FMS and PFMT groups. At baseline and after treatment, patients completed the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form, the Female Sexual Function Index, and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire, and volumetric measurement of the urethral rhabdosphincter (RS) was performed. The Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire and stress test defined subjective and objective cure rates, respectively.

RESULTS

We observed improvements in urinary-related quality of life scores and an increase in RS volume after FMS compared to baseline. All these outcomes were significantly better compared to women who underwent PFMT.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that FMS is a safe and effective conservative option for SUI management in terms of objective and subjective cure rates.

摘要

背景

平面磁刺激(FMS)的特点是由具有均匀分布的电磁场产生刺激。一种可能的应用是治疗压力性尿失禁(SUI)。我们旨在比较接受FMS或盆底肌肉训练(PFMT)的不适合手术的SUI女性患者的客观、主观、生活质量和器械检查结果。

方法

这是一项前瞻性干预研究。经过适当的咨询后,单纯性SUI患者根据其选择的治疗方法分为FMS组和PFMT组。在基线和治疗后,患者完成国际尿失禁咨询问卷简表、女性性功能指数和尿失禁影响问卷,并对尿道横纹括约肌(RS)进行容积测量。患者总体改善印象问卷和压力测试分别定义主观和客观治愈率。

结果

与基线相比,我们观察到FMS后与尿相关的生活质量评分有所改善,RS容积增加。与接受PFMT的女性相比,所有这些结果都明显更好。

结论

我们的研究表明,就客观和主观治愈率而言,FMS是SUI管理的一种安全有效的保守选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08e5/10045723/4cf0baefe3ef/bioengineering-10-00295-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验