Neto Ana Catarina, Santos-Pereira Mariana, Abreu-Mendes Pedro, Neves Delminda, Almeida Henrique, Cruz Francisco, Charrua Ana
Experimental Biology Unit, Department of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.
I3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal.
Biomedicines. 2023 Feb 24;11(3):696. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11030696.
The different definitions of chronic pelvic/visceral pain used by international societies have changed over the years. These differences have a great impact on the way researchers study chronic pelvic/visceral pain. Recently, the role of systemic changes, including the role of the central nervous system, in the perpetuation and chronification of pelvic/visceral pain has gained weight. Consequently, researchers are using animal models that resemble those systemic changes rather than using models that are organ- or tissue-specific. In this review, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using bladder-centric and systemic models, enumerating some of the central nervous system changes and pain-related behaviors occurring in each model. We also present some drawbacks when using animal models and pain-related behavior tests and raise questions about possible, yet to be demonstrated, investigator-related bias. We also suggest new approaches to study chronic pelvic/visceral pain by refining existing animal models or using new ones.
多年来,国际社会对慢性盆腔/内脏疼痛的不同定义不断变化。这些差异对研究人员研究慢性盆腔/内脏疼痛的方式产生了重大影响。最近,包括中枢神经系统作用在内的全身变化在盆腔/内脏疼痛的持续和慢性化中的作用日益受到重视。因此,研究人员正在使用类似于那些全身变化的动物模型,而不是使用器官或组织特异性的模型。在本综述中,我们讨论了使用以膀胱为中心的模型和全身模型的优缺点,列举了每个模型中发生的一些中枢神经系统变化和疼痛相关行为。我们还提出了使用动物模型和疼痛相关行为测试时的一些缺点,并对可能存在但尚未得到证实的研究者相关偏差提出疑问。我们还建议通过改进现有动物模型或使用新模型来研究慢性盆腔/内脏疼痛的新方法。