Bajorat Rika, Danckert Lena, Ebert Florian, Bancken Theresa, Bergt Stefan, Klawitter Felix, Vollmar Brigitte, Reuter Daniel A, Schürholz Tobias, Ehler Johannes
Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Rostock University Medical Center, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, MEDICLIN Müritz-Klinikum, 17192 Waren, Germany.
Biomedicines. 2023 Mar 11;11(3):855. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11030855.
The synthetic antimicrobial peptides (sAMPs) Pep19-2.5 and Pep19-4LF have been shown in vitro and in vivo to reduce the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, leading to the suppression of inflammation and immunomodulation. We hypothesized that intervention with Pep19-2.5 and Pep19-4LF immediately after cardiac arrest and resuscitation (CA-CPR) might attenuate immediate systemic inflammation, survival, and long-term outcomes in a standardized mouse model of CA-CPR. Long-term outcomes up to 28 days were assessed between a control group (saline) and two peptide intervention groups. Primarily, survival as well as neurological and cognitive parameters were assessed. In addition, systemic inflammatory molecules and specific biomarkers were analyzed in plasma as well as in brain tissue. Treatment with sAMPs did not provide any short- or long-term benefits for either survival or neurological outcomes, and no significant benefit on inflammation in the CA-CPR animal model. While no difference was found in the plasma analysis of early cytokines between the intervention groups four hours after resuscitation, a significant increase in UCH-L1, a biomarker of neuronal damage and blood-brain barrier rupture, was measured in the Pep19-4LF-treated group. The theoretical benefit of both sAMPs tested here for the treatment of post-cardiac arrest syndrome could not be proven.
合成抗菌肽(sAMPs)Pep19-2.5和Pep19-4LF已在体外和体内实验中证实可减少促炎细胞因子的释放,从而抑制炎症并实现免疫调节。我们推测,在心脏骤停与复苏(CA-CPR)后立即使用Pep19-2.5和Pep19-4LF进行干预,可能会减轻标准化CA-CPR小鼠模型中的即时全身炎症反应,提高生存率并改善长期预后。我们评估了对照组(生理盐水)和两个肽干预组长达28天的长期预后。主要评估了生存率以及神经和认知参数。此外,还分析了血浆和脑组织中的全身炎症分子及特定生物标志物。在CA-CPR动物模型中,使用sAMPs治疗对生存率或神经功能结局均未提供任何短期或长期益处,对炎症也无显著益处。虽然复苏后4小时干预组之间早期细胞因子的血浆分析未发现差异,但在Pep19-4LF治疗组中,神经元损伤和血脑屏障破裂的生物标志物UCH-L1显著增加。此处测试的两种sAMPs对心脏骤停后综合征治疗的理论益处尚未得到证实。