Struck Manuel Florian, Rost Franziska, Schwarz Thomas, Zimmermann Peter, Siekmeyer Manuela, Gräfe Daniel, Ebel Sebastian, Kirsten Holger, Kleber Christian, Lacher Martin, Donaubauer Bernd
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Children (Basel). 2023 Mar 5;10(3):515. doi: 10.3390/children10030515.
Vascular access in severely injured pediatric trauma patients is associated with time-critical circumstances and low incidences, whereas only scarce literature on procedure performance is available. The purpose of this study was to analyze the performance of different vascular access procedures from the first contact at the scene until three hours after admission. Intubated pediatric trauma patients admitted from the scene to a single Level I trauma center between 2008 and 2019 were analyzed regarding intravenous (IV) and intraosseous (IO) accesses, central venous catheterization (CVC) and arterial line placement. Sixty-five children with a median age of 14 years and median injury severity score of 29 points were included, of which 62 (96.6%) underwent successful prehospital IV or IO access by emergency medical service (EMS) physicians, while it failed in two children (3.1%). On emergency department (ED) admission, IV cannulas of prehospital EMS had malfunctions or were dislodged in seven of 55 children (12.7%). IO access was performed in 17 children without complications, and was associated with younger age, higher injury severity and higher mortality. Fifty-two CVC placements (58 attempts) and 55 arterial line placements (59 attempts) were performed in 45 and 52 children, respectively. All CVC and arterial line placements were performed in the ED, operating room (OR) and intensive care unit (ICU). Ten mechanical complications related to CVC placement (17.8%) and seven related to arterial line placement (10.2%) were observed, none of which had outcome-relevant consequences. This case series suggests that mechanical issues of vascular access may frequently occur, underlining the need for special preparedness in prehospital, ED, ICU and OR environments.
在严重受伤的儿科创伤患者中,血管通路建立与时间紧迫的情况和低发生率相关,而关于操作执行的文献却极为稀少。本研究的目的是分析从现场首次接触到入院三小时内不同血管通路操作的执行情况。对2008年至2019年间从现场收治到单一一级创伤中心的插管儿科创伤患者进行了静脉(IV)和骨内(IO)通路、中心静脉置管(CVC)和动脉置管的分析。纳入了65名儿童,中位年龄为14岁,中位损伤严重程度评分为29分,其中62名(96.6%)由紧急医疗服务(EMS)医生成功进行了院前IV或IO通路建立,2名儿童(3.1%)失败。在急诊科(ED)入院时,55名儿童中有7名(12.7%)的院前EMS静脉套管出现故障或移位。17名儿童进行了IO通路建立,无并发症,且与年龄较小、损伤严重程度较高和死亡率较高相关。分别在45名和52名儿童中进行了52次CVC置管(58次尝试)和55次动脉置管(59次尝试)。所有CVC和动脉置管均在ED、手术室(OR)和重症监护病房(ICU)进行。观察到10例与CVC置管相关的机械并发症(17.8%)和7例与动脉置管相关的机械并发症(10.2%),均未产生与结果相关的后果。该病例系列表明,血管通路的机械问题可能经常发生,凸显了在院前、ED、ICU和OR环境中进行特殊准备的必要性。