Umbrello Michele, Cereghini Sergio, Muttini Stefano
SC Terapia Intensiva Neurochirurgica, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo Polo Universitario, Ospedale San Carlo Borromeo, Via Pio II, 3, 20151 Milano, Italy.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 7;13(6):1022. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061022.
The measurement of pleural (or intrathoracic) pressure is a key element for a proper setting of mechanical ventilator assistance as both under- and over-assistance may cause detrimental effects on both the lungs and the diaphragm. Esophageal pressure (Pes) is the gold standard tool for such measurements; however, it is invasive and seldom used in daily practice, and easier, bedside-available tools that allow for rapid and continuous monitoring are greatly needed. The tidal swing of central venous pressure (CVP) has long been proposed as a surrogate for pleural pressure (Ppl); however, despite the wide availability of central venous catheters, this variable is very often overlooked in critically ill patients. In the present narrative review, the physiological basis for the use of CVP waveforms to estimate Ppl is presented; the findings of previous and recent papers that addressed this topic are systematically reviewed, and the studies are divided into those reporting positive findings (i.e., CVP was found to be a reliable estimate of Pes or Ppl) and those reporting negative findings. Both the strength and pitfalls of this approach are highlighted, and the current knowledge gaps and direction for future research are delineated.
测量胸膜(或胸腔内)压力是正确设置机械通气辅助的关键因素,因为辅助不足和过度辅助都可能对肺和膈肌造成有害影响。食管压力(Pes)是进行此类测量的金标准工具;然而,它具有侵入性,在日常实践中很少使用,因此非常需要更简便、可在床边使用的工具,以便进行快速和持续监测。长期以来,中心静脉压(CVP)的潮气量波动一直被提议作为胸膜压力(Ppl)的替代指标;然而,尽管中心静脉导管广泛可用,但在重症患者中,这个变量经常被忽视。在本叙述性综述中,介绍了使用CVP波形估计Ppl的生理基础;系统回顾了以往和近期涉及该主题的论文结果,并将这些研究分为报告阳性结果(即发现CVP是Pes或Ppl的可靠估计值)和报告阴性结果的研究。本方法的优势和缺陷均得到强调,并明确了当前的知识空白和未来研究方向。