Center for Infectious Disease, Nara Medical University Hospital, Kashihara-shi, Nara, Japan.
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Osaka Women's and Children's Hospital, Izumi-shi, Osaka, Japan.
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 1;16(3):e0247360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247360. eCollection 2021.
It is important to evaluate the size of respiratory effort to prevent patient self-inflicted lung injury and ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction. Esophageal pressure (Pes) measurement is the gold standard for estimating respiratory effort, but it is complicated by technical issues. We previously reported that a change in pleural pressure (ΔPpl) could be estimated without measuring Pes using change in CVP (ΔCVP) that has been adjusted with a simple correction among mechanically ventilated, paralyzed pediatric patients. This study aimed to determine whether our method can be used to estimate ΔPpl in assisted and unassisted spontaneous breathing patients during mechanical ventilation.
The study included hemodynamically stable children (aged <18 years) who were mechanically ventilated, had spontaneous breathing, and had a central venous catheter and esophageal balloon catheter in place. We measured the change in Pes (ΔPes), ΔCVP, and ΔPpl that was calculated using a corrected ΔCVP (cΔCVP-derived ΔPpl) under three pressure support levels (10, 5, and 0 cmH2O). The cΔCVP-derived ΔPpl value was calculated as follows: cΔCVP-derived ΔPpl = k × ΔCVP, where k was the ratio of the change in airway pressure (ΔPaw) to the ΔCVP during airway occlusion test.
Of the 14 patients enrolled in the study, 6 were excluded because correct positioning of the esophageal balloon could not be confirmed, leaving eight patients for analysis (mean age, 4.8 months). Three variables that reflected ΔPpl (ΔPes, ΔCVP, and cΔCVP-derived ΔPpl) were measured and yielded the following results: -6.7 ± 4.8, - -2.6 ± 1.4, and - -7.3 ± 4.5 cmH2O, respectively. The repeated measures correlation between cΔCVP-derived ΔPpl and ΔPes showed that cΔCVP-derived ΔPpl had good correlation with ΔPes (r = 0.84, p< 0.0001).
ΔPpl can be estimated reasonably accurately by ΔCVP using our method in assisted and unassisted spontaneous breathing children during mechanical ventilation.
评估呼吸努力的大小对于防止患者自伤性肺损伤和呼吸机诱导的膈肌功能障碍非常重要。食管压力(Pes)测量是估计呼吸努力的金标准,但它受到技术问题的困扰。我们之前报道过,在机械通气的、麻痹的儿科患者中,通过调整中心静脉压(CVP)的变化,可以使用 CVP 的变化(ΔCVP)来估计胸膜压力(Ppl)的变化,而无需测量 Pes。本研究旨在确定我们的方法是否可用于估计机械通气期间辅助和自主自主呼吸患者的ΔPpl。
该研究纳入血流动力学稳定的儿童(年龄<18 岁),他们正在接受机械通气,有自主呼吸,并且有中心静脉导管和食管球囊导管。我们测量了在三种压力支持水平(10、5 和 0 cmH2O)下的 Pes 变化(ΔPes)、ΔCVP 和使用校正后的 CVP(cΔCVP 衍生的ΔPpl)计算的ΔPpl。cΔCVP 衍生的ΔPpl 值的计算方法如下:cΔCVP 衍生的ΔPpl = k × ΔCVP,其中 k 是在气道闭塞试验期间气道压力(ΔPaw)与ΔCVP 的变化之比。
在纳入研究的 14 名患者中,有 6 名因无法确认食管球囊的正确位置而被排除,留下 8 名患者进行分析(平均年龄为 4.8 个月)。测量了反映ΔPpl 的三个变量(ΔPes、ΔCVP 和 cΔCVP 衍生的ΔPpl),结果分别为-6.7±4.8、-2.6±1.4 和-7.3±4.5 cmH2O。cΔCVP 衍生的ΔPpl 与ΔPes 的重复测量相关性表明,cΔCVP 衍生的ΔPpl 与ΔPes 具有良好的相关性(r=0.84,p<0.0001)。
在机械通气期间,通过我们的方法,辅助和自主自主呼吸的儿童可以通过 ΔCVP 合理准确地估计ΔPpl。