• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝细胞癌成像特征的三维体素定量评估

Three-Dimensional Voxel-Wise Quantitative Assessment of Imaging Features in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

作者信息

Huang Chongfei, Ying Shihong, Huang Meixiang, Qiu Chenhui, Lu Fang, Peng Zhiyi, Kong Dexing

机构信息

School of Mathematical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.

Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310030, China.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 18;13(6):1170. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061170.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics13061170
PMID:36980478
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10047821/
Abstract

Voxel-wise quantitative assessment of typical characteristics in three-dimensional (3D) multiphase computed tomography (CT) imaging, especially arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) and subsequent washout (WO), is crucial for the diagnosis and therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, this process is still missing in practice. Radiologists often visually estimate these features, which limit the diagnostic accuracy due to subjective interpretation and qualitative assessment. Quantitative assessment is one of the solutions to this problem. However, performing voxel-wise assessment in 3D is difficult due to the misalignments between images caused by respiratory and other physiological motions. In this paper, based on the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (v2018), we propose a registration-based quantitative model for the 3D voxel-wise assessment of image characteristics through multiple CT imaging phases. Specifically, we selected three phases from sequential CT imaging phases, i.e., pre-contrast phase (Pre), arterial phase (AP), delayed phase (DP), and then registered Pre and DP images to the AP image to extract and assess the major imaging characteristics. An iterative reweighted local cross-correlation was applied in the proposed registration model to construct the fidelity term for comparison of intensity features across different imaging phases, which is challenging due to their distinct intensity appearance. Experiments on clinical dataset showed that the means of dice similarity coefficient of liver were 98.6% and 98.1%, those of surface distance were 0.38 and 0.54 mm, and those of Hausdorff distance were 4.34 and 6.16 mm, indicating that quantitative estimation can be accomplished with high accuracy. For the classification of APHE, the result obtained by our method was consistent with those acquired by experts. For the WO, the effectiveness of the model was verified in terms of WO volume ratio.

摘要

在三维(3D)多期计算机断层扫描(CT)成像中,对典型特征进行体素级定量评估,尤其是动脉期高增强(APHE)和随后的廓清(WO),对于肝细胞癌(HCC)的诊断和治疗至关重要。然而,在实际应用中这一过程仍然缺失。放射科医生通常通过视觉估计这些特征,由于主观解读和定性评估,这限制了诊断准确性。定量评估是解决这一问题的方法之一。然而,由于呼吸和其他生理运动导致图像之间的错位,在3D中进行体素级评估很困难。在本文中,基于肝脏影像报告和数据系统(v2018),我们提出了一种基于配准的定量模型,用于通过多个CT成像期对图像特征进行3D体素级评估。具体而言,我们从连续的CT成像期选择了三个期,即平扫期(Pre)、动脉期(AP)、延迟期(DP),然后将Pre和DP图像配准到AP图像,以提取和评估主要成像特征。在所提出的配准模型中应用了迭代加权局部互相关,以构建保真度项,用于比较不同成像期的强度特征,由于它们不同的强度表现,这具有挑战性。在临床数据集上的实验表明,肝脏的骰子相似系数均值分别为98.6%和98.1%,表面距离均值分别为0.38和0.54毫米,豪斯多夫距离均值分别为4.34和6.16毫米,表明可以高精度地完成定量估计。对于APHE的分类,我们的方法得到的结果与专家获得的结果一致。对于WO,在WO体积比方面验证了模型的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26c4/10047821/b96aa624bf79/diagnostics-13-01170-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26c4/10047821/65bd046ec987/diagnostics-13-01170-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26c4/10047821/a1db6fb90618/diagnostics-13-01170-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26c4/10047821/170887495332/diagnostics-13-01170-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26c4/10047821/176a250a8235/diagnostics-13-01170-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26c4/10047821/b93e68ecc953/diagnostics-13-01170-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26c4/10047821/400c91e39a32/diagnostics-13-01170-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26c4/10047821/a0c1606fcc16/diagnostics-13-01170-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26c4/10047821/0e91e1f5a6db/diagnostics-13-01170-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26c4/10047821/6f6ba1ac3c04/diagnostics-13-01170-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26c4/10047821/b96aa624bf79/diagnostics-13-01170-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26c4/10047821/65bd046ec987/diagnostics-13-01170-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26c4/10047821/a1db6fb90618/diagnostics-13-01170-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26c4/10047821/170887495332/diagnostics-13-01170-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26c4/10047821/176a250a8235/diagnostics-13-01170-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26c4/10047821/b93e68ecc953/diagnostics-13-01170-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26c4/10047821/400c91e39a32/diagnostics-13-01170-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26c4/10047821/a0c1606fcc16/diagnostics-13-01170-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26c4/10047821/0e91e1f5a6db/diagnostics-13-01170-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26c4/10047821/6f6ba1ac3c04/diagnostics-13-01170-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26c4/10047821/b96aa624bf79/diagnostics-13-01170-g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Three-Dimensional Voxel-Wise Quantitative Assessment of Imaging Features in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.肝细胞癌成像特征的三维体素定量评估
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 18;13(6):1170. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061170.
2
Does quantitative assessment of arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout improve LI-RADS v2018-based classification of liver lesions?动脉期增强程度和廓清率的定量评估是否能提高基于 LI-RADS v2018 的肝脏病变分类?
Eur Radiol. 2020 May;30(5):2922-2933. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06596-9. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
3
Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: Discordance Between Computed Tomography and Gadoxetate-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Major Features.肝脏影像报告和数据系统:计算机断层扫描与钆塞酸二钠增强磁共振成像在检测肝细胞癌主要特征方面的不一致性
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2018 Jan/Feb;42(1):155-161. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000642.
4
PA-ResSeg: A phase attention residual network for liver tumor segmentation from multiphase CT images.PA-ResSeg:一种用于多期 CT 图像中肝脏肿瘤分割的相位注意残差网络。
Med Phys. 2021 Jul;48(7):3752-3766. doi: 10.1002/mp.14922. Epub 2021 May 30.
5
A method for assessing voxel correspondence in longitudinal tumor imaging.一种用于评估纵向肿瘤成像中体素对应关系的方法。
Med Phys. 2011 May;38(5):2742-53. doi: 10.1118/1.3578600.
6
What proportion of LI-RADS 5 observations reported in clinical practice do not meet LI-RADS 5 criteria?临床实践中报告的肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)5类观察结果中,有多大比例不符合LI-RADS 5类标准?
Eur Radiol. 2022 May;32(5):3327-3333. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08389-5. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
7
Multi-arterial phase MRI depicts inconsistent arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) subtypes in liver observations of patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma.多动脉期 MRI 描绘了肝癌高危患者肝脏观察中动脉期强化(APHE)亚型的不一致性。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Oct;31(10):7594-7604. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07924-8. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
8
Imaging features of histological subtypes of hepatocellular carcinoma: Implication for LI-RADS.肝细胞癌组织学亚型的影像学特征:对肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)的意义
JHEP Rep. 2021 Sep 30;3(6):100380. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100380. eCollection 2021 Dec.
9
4D liver tumor localization using cone-beam projections and a biomechanical model.基于锥形束投影和生物力学模型的 4D 肝脏肿瘤定位
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Apr;133:183-192. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.10.040. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
10
Evaluation of image registration in subtracted 3D dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of treated hepatocellular carcinoma.经治疗的肝细胞癌三维动态对比增强磁共振成像减影中的图像配准评估
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Feb;204(2):287-96. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.12417.

本文引用的文献

1
Does quantitative assessment of arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout improve LI-RADS v2018-based classification of liver lesions?动脉期增强程度和廓清率的定量评估是否能提高基于 LI-RADS v2018 的肝脏病变分类?
Eur Radiol. 2020 May;30(5):2922-2933. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06596-9. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
2
Image Segmentation, Registration and Characterization in R with SimpleITK.使用SimpleITK在R语言中进行图像分割、配准与特征描述
J Stat Softw. 2018 Aug;86. doi: 10.18637/jss.v086.i08. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
3
Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2018: Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in At-Risk Patients.
肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)2018 版:高危患者肝细胞癌的影像学表现。
Radiology. 2018 Dec;289(3):816-830. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018181494. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
4
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
5
SimpleITK Image-Analysis Notebooks: a Collaborative Environment for Education and Reproducible Research.SimpleITK 图像分析笔记本:用于教育和可重复研究的协作环境。
J Digit Imaging. 2018 Jun;31(3):290-303. doi: 10.1007/s10278-017-0037-8.
6
2017 Version of LI-RADS for CT and MR Imaging: An Update.2017 版 CT 和 MR 成像肝脏影像学报告和数据系统:更新。
Radiographics. 2017 Nov-Dec;37(7):1994-2017. doi: 10.1148/rg.2017170098.
7
Quantitative assessment of washout in hepatocellular carcinoma using MRI.使用磁共振成像对肝细胞癌中的洗脱进行定量评估。
BMC Cancer. 2016 Sep 29;16(1):758. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2797-9.
8
A retrospective analysis of long term outcomes in patients undergoing hepatic resection for large (>5 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma.对接受肝切除术治疗大(>5厘米)肝细胞癌患者的长期预后进行回顾性分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2016 Nov;18(11):943-949. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
9
Distinguishing hemangiomas from metastases on liver MRI performed with gadoxetate disodium: Value of the extended washout sign.使用钆塞酸二钠进行肝脏磁共振成像时鉴别肝血管瘤与转移瘤:延迟廓清征的价值
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Mar;85(3):635-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.12.028. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
10
Hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnostic performance of multidetector CT and MR imaging-a systematic review and meta-analysis.肝细胞癌:多排 CT 和 MR 成像的诊断性能——系统评价和荟萃分析。
Radiology. 2015 Apr;275(1):97-109. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14140690. Epub 2015 Jan 5.