Suppr超能文献

上消化道出血且未行内镜检查患者死亡率预测的内镜前评分准确性

The Accuracy of Pre-Endoscopic Scores for Mortality Prediction in Patients with Upper GI Bleeding and No Endoscopy Performed.

作者信息

Cazacu Sergiu Marian, Alexandru Dragoș Ovidiu, Statie Răzvan-Cristian, Iordache Sevastița, Ungureanu Bogdan Silviu, Iovănescu Vlad Florin, Popa Petrică, Sacerdoțianu Victor Mihai, Neagoe Carmen Daniela, Florescu Mirela Marinela

机构信息

Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gastroenterology Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Petru Rares Street No 2-4, 200349 Craiova, Dolj County, Romania.

Biostatistics Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Petru Rares Street No 2-4, 200349 Craiova, Dolj County, Romania.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 21;13(6):1188. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061188.

Abstract

(1) Background: The assessment of mortality and rebleeding rate in upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is essential, and several prognostic scores have been proposed. Some patients with UGIB did not undergo endoscopy, either because they refused the procedure, suffered from alcohol withdrawal symptoms or altered general status, or because the bleeding was severe enough to cause death before the endoscopy. The mortality risk in the subgroup of patients without endoscopy is poorly evaluated in the literature. (2) Methods: The purpose of the study was to identify the most useful scores for the assessment of in-hospital mortality in patients with UGIB with no endoscopy performed and no known etiology. A total of 198 patients with UGIB and no endoscopy performed were admitted between January 2017 and December 2021 and the accuracy of 12 prognostic scores and the Charlson comorbidity index for in-hospital mortality prediction were analyzed, as well as Child-Pugh Turcotte (CPT) and Meld scores in patients with cirrhosis. (3) Results: The mortality rate was 37.9%, higher than in variceal (21.9%, < 0.0001) and non-variceal bleeding (7.4%, < 0.0001). The most accurate scores by AUC were the International Bleeding score (INBS, 0.844), Glasgow Blatchford (0.783), MAP score (0.78), Iino (0.766), AIM65 and modified N-score (0.745 each), modified Glasgow-Blatchford (0.73), H3B2 and N-score (0.701); Rockall, Baylor, and T-score had an AUC below 0.7. MELD score was superior to CPT in patients with cirrhosis (AUC 0.811 versus 0.670). (4) Conclusions: The mortality rate in UGIB with no endoscopy was higher than in both variceal and non-variceal bleeding and was higher in the pandemic period but with no statistical significance (45.3% versus 32.14%, = 0.0586), mainly because of positive cases. Only one case of rebleeding was noted; the hospitalization period was significantly shorter. The most accurate score was International Bleeding Score; the MELD score had a higher but moderate accuracy compared with CPT in patients with cirrhosis.

摘要

(1) 背景:评估上消化道出血(UGIB)的死亡率和再出血率至关重要,目前已提出多种预后评分系统。部分UGIB患者未接受内镜检查,原因包括拒绝该检查、出现酒精戒断症状或一般状况改变,或者出血严重到在内镜检查前就已导致死亡。文献中对未接受内镜检查患者亚组的死亡风险评估不足。(2) 方法:本研究旨在确定对未接受内镜检查且病因不明的UGIB患者住院死亡率评估最有用的评分系统。2017年1月至2021年12月期间,共收治了198例未接受内镜检查的UGIB患者,分析了12种预后评分系统及Charlson合并症指数对住院死亡率预测的准确性,以及肝硬化患者的Child-Pugh Turcotte(CPT)和Meld评分。(3) 结果:死亡率为37.9%,高于静脉曲张出血(21.9%,P<0.0001)和非静脉曲张出血(7.4%,P<0.0001)。按AUC计算,最准确的评分系统为国际出血评分(INBS,0.844)、格拉斯哥布莱奇福德评分(0.783)、MAP评分(0.78)、饭野评分(0.766)、AIM65和改良N评分(均为0.745)、改良格拉斯哥-布莱奇福德评分(0.73)、H3B2和N评分(0.701);Rockall评分、贝勒评分和T评分的AUC低于0.7。在肝硬化患者中,Meld评分优于CPT评分(AUC分别为0.811和0.670)。(4) 结论:未接受内镜检查的UGIB患者死亡率高于静脉曲张出血和非静脉曲张出血患者,在大流行期间更高,但无统计学意义(45.3%对32.14%,P = 0.0586),主要是因为阳性病例。仅记录到1例再出血;住院时间明显缩短。最准确的评分系统是国际出血评分;在肝硬化患者中,Meld评分的准确性高于CPT评分,但为中等水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fda5/10047350/deee446ad4c9/diagnostics-13-01188-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验