Suppr超能文献

早期中央型或周围型非小细胞肺癌立体定向体部放射治疗单次分割与五次分割方案的生存结果比较。

Comparison of Survival Outcomes of Single- and Five-Fraction Schedules of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Central or Peripheral NSCLC.

作者信息

Huang Karen, Prasad Sharan, Ma Sung Jun, Iovoli Austin J, Farrugia Mark K, Malik Nadia K, Singh Anurag K

机构信息

Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.

College of Human Ecology, Cornell University, 410 Thurston Avenue, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 8;15(6):1648. doi: 10.3390/cancers15061648.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) frequently involves different fractionation schemes for peripheral and central tumors due to concerns with toxicity. We performed an observational cohort study to determine survival outcomes for patients with peripheral and central NSCLC treated with SBRT.

METHODS

A single-institutional database of patients with early-stage NSCLC treated with SBRT from September 2008 to December 2018 was evaluated. Outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), local failure (LF), nodal failure (NF), and distant failure (DF). Cox multivariable analysis (MVA), Kaplan-Meier plotting, Fine-Gray competing risk MVA, and propensity score matching were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 265 patients were included with a median follow-up of 44.2 months. There were 191 (72%) and 74 (28%) patients with peripheral and central tumors treated with single-fraction SBRT to a dose of 27 Gy and five-fraction SBRT to a dose of 50 Gy, respectively. On Cox MVA, there was no difference in OS (adjusted hazards ratio (aHR) of 1.04, 95% CI of 0.74-1.46) or PFS (aHR of 1.05, 95% CI of 0.76-1.45). On Fine-Gray competing risk MVA, there were no differences in LF, NF, or DF. Propensity matching confirmed these findings.

CONCLUSION

The survival outcomes of patients treated with SBRT for early-stage NSCLC were equivalent for central and peripheral tumors.

摘要

背景

由于对毒性的担忧,立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)用于早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的治疗时,外周肿瘤和中央肿瘤常采用不同的分割方案。我们进行了一项观察性队列研究,以确定接受SBRT治疗的外周和中央NSCLC患者的生存结局。

方法

评估了一个单一机构的数据库,该数据库包含2008年9月至2018年12月接受SBRT治疗的早期NSCLC患者。结局指标为无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)、局部失败(LF)、淋巴结失败(NF)和远处失败(DF)。进行了Cox多变量分析(MVA)、Kaplan-Meier绘图、Fine-Gray竞争风险MVA和倾向评分匹配。

结果

共纳入265例患者,中位随访时间为44.2个月。分别有191例(72%)外周肿瘤患者和74例(28%)中央肿瘤患者接受了单次分割SBRT,剂量为27 Gy,以及5次分割SBRT,剂量为50 Gy。在Cox MVA中,OS(调整后风险比[aHR]为1.04,95%置信区间[CI]为0.74-1.46)或PFS(aHR为1.05,95%CI为0.76-1.45)无差异。在Fine-Gray竞争风险MVA中,LF、NF或DF无差异。倾向匹配证实了这些结果。

结论

接受SBRT治疗的早期NSCLC患者,中央肿瘤和外周肿瘤的生存结局相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c6/10046844/ff47f43e2d36/cancers-15-01648-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验