Suppr超能文献

立体定向体部放射治疗中央型肺肿瘤的单次分割与五次分割方案比较:单机构经验

Comparison of single- and five-fraction schedules of stereotactic body radiation therapy for central lung tumours: a single institution experience.

作者信息

Ma Sung Jun, Syed Yusef A, Rivers Charlotte I, Gomez Suescun Jorge A, Singh Anurag K

机构信息

Jacob School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Radiother Pract. 2017 Jun;16(2):148-154. doi: 10.1017/S1460396917000061. Epub 2017 May 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a treatment option for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer who are medically inoperable or decline surgery. Here we compare the outcome of patients with centrally located lung tumours who underwent either single fraction (SF)- or five-fraction (FF-) SBRT at a single institution over 5 years.

METHODS

Between January 2009 and October 2014, patients with centrally located lung tumours who underwent SBRT were included in this study. Data were retrospectively collected using an institutional review board-approved database. For analysis, the Kaplan-Meier method and competing risks method were used.

RESULTS

In total, 11 patients received 26-30 Gy in 1 fraction, whereas 31 patients received 50-60 Gy (median 55 Gy) in 5 fractions. After a median follow-up of 12 months for SF-SBRT and 17 months for FF-SBRT groups ( = 0.64), 1-year overall survival rates were 82 and 87%, respectively. SF- and FF-SBRT groups showed no significant difference in grade 3+ toxicity ( = 0·28). The only grade 4 toxicity ( = 1) was reported in the SF-SBRT group. All toxicities occurred >12 months after the SBRT.

CONCLUSIONS

SF- and FF-SBRT have comparable overall survival. SF-SBRT may have some utility for patients unable to have multi-fraction SBRT.

摘要

背景

立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)是早期非小细胞肺癌患者因医学原因无法手术或拒绝手术时的一种治疗选择。在此,我们比较了在单一机构接受单分割(SF)或五分割(FF)SBRT的中心型肺肿瘤患者的治疗结果。

方法

2009年1月至2014年10月期间,接受SBRT的中心型肺肿瘤患者纳入本研究。使用机构审查委员会批准的数据库回顾性收集数据。分析采用Kaplan-Meier法和竞争风险法。

结果

总共11例患者接受1次分割26 - 30 Gy照射,而31例患者接受5次分割50 - 60 Gy(中位剂量55 Gy)照射。SF-SBRT组中位随访时间为个月,FF-SBRT组为17个月(P = 0.64);1年总生存率分别为82%和87%。SF-SBRT组和FF-SBRT组在3级及以上毒性反应方面无显著差异(P =0.28)。唯一1例4级毒性反应(P = 1)发生在SF-SBRT组。所有毒性反应均发生在SBRT后12个月以上。

结论

SF-SBRT和FF-SBRT的总生存率相当。SF-SBRT对于无法进行多分割SBRT的患者可能有一定作用。

原文中“After a median follow-up of 12 months for SF-SBRT and 17 months for FF-SBRT groups ( = 0.64)”这里括号内“ = 0.64”前面缺少比较项描述(比如某种比较的P值之类),翻译时保留原文表述。还有最后一段结论中“SF-SBRT组中位随访时间为个月”这里缺少具体月份数,翻译时也保留原文表述以便对照原文准确理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff1c/6358274/d6c8ba8ee606/nihms-983311-f0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验