• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从 GB/T37228-2018 的新视角评估政府应急响应——以中国为例。

Government Emergency Response Assessment from a Novel Perspective of GB/T37228-2018-A Case Study in China.

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, Hanshan Normal University, Chaozhou 521041, China.

School of Mathematics and Statistics, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 14;20(6):5091. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065091.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20065091
PMID:36982000
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10049156/
Abstract

With the development of the economy and science and technology, the threat of various emergencies has brought severe governance challenges to governments. In order to minimize the harm and loss of emergencies and further improve the authority and credibility of government, this study uses the two-tuple linguistic information method to assess the indicator system of H Government of China constructed according to the GB/T37228-2018 standard (Societal security-Emergency management-Requirements). The result shows that the management of emergency resource management, information collection methods, response and guarantee plans, and other aspects is relatively standardized. However, the middle and late stages of emergency management are relatively weak, which is mainly reflected in the continuity of situation assessment, in information sharing and feedback, and in the coordination process. The current work implies that the GB/T37228-2018 standard broadens the approach of government emergency response assessment and strengthens the standardization process of emergency response. It also challenges the implicit knowledge of emergency response, the integration of time and space variables, and other issues.

摘要

随着经济和科学技术的发展,各种突发事件的威胁给政府带来了严峻的治理挑战。为了将突发事件的危害和损失降到最低,进一步提高政府的权威性和公信力,本研究采用二元语义信息法,对依据 GB/T37228-2018 标准(社会安全-应急管理-要求)构建的 H 政府突发事件指标体系进行评估。结果表明,应急资源管理、信息采集方法、响应和保障计划等方面的管理较为规范,但突发事件管理的中后期较为薄弱,主要体现在情景评估的连续性、信息共享和反馈以及协调过程中。目前的工作表明,GB/T37228-2018 标准拓宽了政府应急响应评估的方法,加强了应急响应的标准化过程,同时也对应急响应的隐含知识、时空变量的整合等问题提出了挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a18/10049156/35ca048e4c5f/ijerph-20-05091-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a18/10049156/34c1303106cd/ijerph-20-05091-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a18/10049156/42af40b108d8/ijerph-20-05091-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a18/10049156/2d950c5dbe2b/ijerph-20-05091-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a18/10049156/e12040aa848d/ijerph-20-05091-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a18/10049156/b1ec3ab58af5/ijerph-20-05091-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a18/10049156/35ca048e4c5f/ijerph-20-05091-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a18/10049156/34c1303106cd/ijerph-20-05091-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a18/10049156/42af40b108d8/ijerph-20-05091-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a18/10049156/2d950c5dbe2b/ijerph-20-05091-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a18/10049156/e12040aa848d/ijerph-20-05091-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a18/10049156/b1ec3ab58af5/ijerph-20-05091-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a18/10049156/35ca048e4c5f/ijerph-20-05091-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Government Emergency Response Assessment from a Novel Perspective of GB/T37228-2018-A Case Study in China.从 GB/T37228-2018 的新视角评估政府应急响应——以中国为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 14;20(6):5091. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065091.
2
Exploring time evolution characteristics of the collaborative mode in emergency information release of public health emergencies: A network analysis of response to COVID-19 from the central government of China.探索突发公共卫生事件应急信息发布中协同模式的时间演变特征:基于中国中央政府应对 COVID-19 的网络分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 29;10:970514. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.970514. eCollection 2022.
3
Government Information Dissemination During Public Health Emergencies: An Analysis of China's Experiences.政府在突发公共卫生事件中的信息传播:中国的经验分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 22;10:748236. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.748236. eCollection 2022.
4
An investigation into local government plans for public health emergencies in China.对中国地方政府公共卫生突发事件应对计划的一项调查。
Health Policy Plan. 2007 Nov;22(6):375-80. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czm029. Epub 2007 Sep 17.
5
Promoting information sharing for multijurisdictional public health emergency preparedness.促进多司法管辖区公共卫生应急准备的信息共享。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1):84-9. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181ec41d5.
6
Emergency preparedness for infant and young child feeding in emergencies (IYCF-E): an Australian audit of emergency plans and guidance.紧急情况下婴幼儿喂养的应急准备(IYCF-E):对澳大利亚应急计划和指南的审核。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):1278. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7528-0.
7
Improvement of Emergency Management Mechanism of Public Health Crisis in Rural China: A Review Article.中国农村公共卫生危机应急管理机制的改进:一篇综述文章。
Iran J Public Health. 2018 Feb;47(2):156-165.
8
The public health emergency management system in China: trends from 2002 to 2012.中国公共卫生应急管理体系:2002 年至 2012 年的趋势。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Apr 11;18(1):474. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5284-1.
9
Research on measurement indexes and evaluation for the collaborative efficiency of emergency information sharing in coastal cities of China.中国沿海城市应急信息共享协同效率的测量指标与评价研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0276589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276589. eCollection 2022.
10
Background to the four stages of emergency management: The role of enterprise GIS.应急管理四个阶段的背景:企业地理信息系统的作用。
J Emerg Manag. 2018 Jul/Aug;16(4):229-243. doi: 10.5055/jem.2018.0372.