Suppr超能文献

A型主动脉修复术后残余主动脉夹层的再次干预:5年前瞻性随访结果

Reintervention of Residual Aortic Dissection after Type A Aortic Repair: Results of a Prospective Follow-Up at 5 Years.

作者信息

Porto Alizée, Omnes Virgile, Bartoli Michel A, Azogui Ron, Resseguier Noémie, De Masi Mariangela, Bal Laurence, Imbert Laura, Jaussaud Nicolas, Morera Pierre, Jacquier Alexis, Barral Pierre-Antoine, Gariboldi Vlad, Gaudry Marine

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Timone Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France.

Department of Vascular Surgery, Timone Aortic Center, Timone Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 18;12(6):2363. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062363.

Abstract

Background After a type A aortic dissection repair, a patent false lumen in the descending aorta is the most common situation encountered, and is a well-known risk factor for aortic growth, reinterventions and mortality. The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term results of residual aortic dissection (RAD) at a high-volume aortic center with prospective follow-up. Methods In this prospective single-center study, all patients operated for type A aortic dissection between January 2017 and December 2022 were included. Patients without postoperative computed tomography scans or during follow-up at our center, and patients without RAD were excluded. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality during follow-up for patients with RAD. The secondary endpoints were perioperative mortality, rate of distal aneurysmal evolution, location of distal aneurysmal evolution, rate of distal reinterventions, outcomes of distal reinterventions, and aortic-related death during follow-up. Results In total, 200 survivors of RAD comprised the study group. After a mean follow-up of 27.2 months (1-66), eight patients (4.0%) died and 107 (53.5%) had an aneurysmal progression. The rate of distal reintervention was 19.5% (39/200), for malperfusion syndrome in seven cases (3.5%) and aneurysmal evolution in 32 cases (16.0%). Most reinterventions occurred during the first 2 years (82.1%). Twenty-seven patients were treated for an aneurysmal evolution of RAD including aortic arch with hybrid repair in 21 cases and branched aortic arch endoprosthesis in six cases. In the hybrid repair group, there was no death, and the rate of morbidity was 28.6% (6/21) (one minor stroke, one pulmonary complication, one recurrent paralysis with complete recovery and three major bleeding events). In the branched endograft group, there was no death, no stroke, and no paraplegia. There was one case (16.7%) of carotid dissection. Complete aortic remodeling or complete FL thrombosis on the thoracic aorta was found in 18 cases (85.7%) and in five cases (83.3%) in the hybrid and branched endograft groups, respectively. Conclusions: Despite a critical course in most cases of RAD, with a high rate of aneurysmal evolution and reintervention, the long-term mortality rate remains low with a close follow-up and a multidisciplinary management in an expert center.

摘要

背景

在A型主动脉夹层修复术后,降主动脉存在通畅的假腔是最常见的情况,并且是主动脉扩张、再次干预和死亡的一个众所周知的危险因素。本研究的目的是分析一家大型主动脉中心对残余主动脉夹层(RAD)进行前瞻性随访的长期结果。方法:在这项前瞻性单中心研究中,纳入了2017年1月至2022年12月期间接受A型主动脉夹层手术的所有患者。排除术后未进行计算机断层扫描或在本中心随访期间未进行扫描的患者,以及无RAD的患者。主要终点是RAD患者随访期间的全因死亡率。次要终点包括围手术期死亡率、远端动脉瘤进展率、远端动脉瘤进展的部位、远端再次干预率、远端再次干预的结果以及随访期间与主动脉相关的死亡。结果:共有200例RAD幸存者组成研究组。平均随访27.2个月(1 - 66个月)后,8例患者(4.0%)死亡,107例(53.5%)出现动脉瘤进展。远端再次干预率为19.5%(39/200),其中7例(3.5%)因灌注不良综合征,32例(16.0%)因动脉瘤进展。大多数再次干预发生在最初2年内(82.1%)。27例患者因RAD的动脉瘤进展接受治疗,其中21例行主动脉弓杂交修复,6例行分支型主动脉弓内支架植入术。在杂交修复组中,无死亡病例,发病率为28.6%(6/21)(1例轻度卒中、1例肺部并发症、1例复发性麻痹且完全恢复以及3例大出血事件)。在分支型内支架组中,无死亡、无卒中、无截瘫。有1例(16.7%)颈动脉夹层。杂交组和分支型内支架组分别有18例(85.7%)和5例(83.3%)在胸主动脉出现完全主动脉重塑或完全假腔血栓形成。结论:尽管大多数RAD病例病情危急,动脉瘤进展率和再次干预率较高,但在专家中心进行密切随访和多学科管理的情况下,长期死亡率仍然较低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验