1 Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA.
2 Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2019 Jan-Dec;25:1076029619870249. doi: 10.1177/1076029619870249.
We compared the risks of switching to another oral anticoagulant (OAC) and discontinuation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) among elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who were prescribed rivaroxaban or dabigatran versus apixaban. Patients (≥65 years of age) with NVAF prescribed DOACs (January 1, 2013 to September 30, 2017) were identified from the Humana research database and grouped into DOAC cohorts. Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate whether the risk for switching to another OAC or discontinuing index DOACs differed among cohorts. Of the study population (N = 38 250), 55.9% were prescribed apixaban (mean age: 78.6 years; 49.8% female), 37.3% rivaroxaban (mean age: 77.4 years; 46.7% female), and 6.8% dabigatran (mean age: 77.0 years; 44.0% female). Compared to patients prescribed apixaban, patients prescribed rivaroxaban (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.92-2.25; < .001) or dabigatran (HR: 3.74; 95% CI, 3.35-4.18, < .001) had a significantly higher risk of switching to another OAC during the follow-up; compared to patients prescribed apixaban, the risks of discontinuation were also higher for patients treated with rivaroxaban (HR: 1.10; 95% CI, 1.07-1.13, < .001) or dabigatran (HR: 1.29; 95% CI, 1.23-1.35, < .001).
我们比较了服用利伐沙班或达比加群的老年非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者转换为另一种口服抗凝剂(OAC)和停止直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)的风险,与服用阿哌沙班的患者相比。从 Humana 研究数据库中确定了(2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 9 月 30 日)服用 DOAC(NVAF)的患者,并将其分为 DOAC 队列。使用 Cox 回归分析评估不同队列之间转换为另一种 OAC 或停止服用指数 DOAC 的风险是否存在差异。在研究人群中(N = 38250),55.9%的患者服用阿哌沙班(平均年龄:78.6 岁;49.8%为女性),37.3%的患者服用利伐沙班(平均年龄:77.4 岁;46.7%为女性),6.8%的患者服用达比加群(平均年龄:77.0 岁;44.0%为女性)。与服用阿哌沙班的患者相比,服用利伐沙班的患者(风险比 [HR]:2.08;95%置信区间 [CI]:1.92-2.25;<.001)或达比加群(HR:3.74;95% CI:3.35-4.18;<.001)在随访期间转换为另一种 OAC 的风险显著增加;与服用阿哌沙班的患者相比,服用利伐沙班(HR:1.10;95% CI:1.07-1.13;<.001)或达比加群(HR:1.29;95% CI:1.23-1.35;<.001)的患者停药风险也更高。