• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同直接口服抗凝药物治疗的老年非瓣膜性心房颤动患者转换为另一种口服抗凝药物和停药情况。

Switching to Another Oral Anticoagulant and Drug Discontinuation Among Elderly Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Treated With Different Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

机构信息

1 Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA.

2 Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2019 Jan-Dec;25:1076029619870249. doi: 10.1177/1076029619870249.

DOI:10.1177/1076029619870249
PMID:31418293
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6829636/
Abstract

We compared the risks of switching to another oral anticoagulant (OAC) and discontinuation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) among elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who were prescribed rivaroxaban or dabigatran versus apixaban. Patients (≥65 years of age) with NVAF prescribed DOACs (January 1, 2013 to September 30, 2017) were identified from the Humana research database and grouped into DOAC cohorts. Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate whether the risk for switching to another OAC or discontinuing index DOACs differed among cohorts. Of the study population (N = 38 250), 55.9% were prescribed apixaban (mean age: 78.6 years; 49.8% female), 37.3% rivaroxaban (mean age: 77.4 years; 46.7% female), and 6.8% dabigatran (mean age: 77.0 years; 44.0% female). Compared to patients prescribed apixaban, patients prescribed rivaroxaban (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.92-2.25; < .001) or dabigatran (HR: 3.74; 95% CI, 3.35-4.18, < .001) had a significantly higher risk of switching to another OAC during the follow-up; compared to patients prescribed apixaban, the risks of discontinuation were also higher for patients treated with rivaroxaban (HR: 1.10; 95% CI, 1.07-1.13, < .001) or dabigatran (HR: 1.29; 95% CI, 1.23-1.35, < .001).

摘要

我们比较了服用利伐沙班或达比加群的老年非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者转换为另一种口服抗凝剂(OAC)和停止直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)的风险,与服用阿哌沙班的患者相比。从 Humana 研究数据库中确定了(2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 9 月 30 日)服用 DOAC(NVAF)的患者,并将其分为 DOAC 队列。使用 Cox 回归分析评估不同队列之间转换为另一种 OAC 或停止服用指数 DOAC 的风险是否存在差异。在研究人群中(N = 38250),55.9%的患者服用阿哌沙班(平均年龄:78.6 岁;49.8%为女性),37.3%的患者服用利伐沙班(平均年龄:77.4 岁;46.7%为女性),6.8%的患者服用达比加群(平均年龄:77.0 岁;44.0%为女性)。与服用阿哌沙班的患者相比,服用利伐沙班的患者(风险比 [HR]:2.08;95%置信区间 [CI]:1.92-2.25;<.001)或达比加群(HR:3.74;95% CI:3.35-4.18;<.001)在随访期间转换为另一种 OAC 的风险显著增加;与服用阿哌沙班的患者相比,服用利伐沙班(HR:1.10;95% CI:1.07-1.13;<.001)或达比加群(HR:1.29;95% CI:1.23-1.35;<.001)的患者停药风险也更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b11/6829636/168eb477c6e8/10.1177_1076029619870249-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b11/6829636/e5bd7d4cfe48/10.1177_1076029619870249-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b11/6829636/9f00cd2249ae/10.1177_1076029619870249-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b11/6829636/168eb477c6e8/10.1177_1076029619870249-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b11/6829636/e5bd7d4cfe48/10.1177_1076029619870249-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b11/6829636/9f00cd2249ae/10.1177_1076029619870249-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b11/6829636/168eb477c6e8/10.1177_1076029619870249-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Switching to Another Oral Anticoagulant and Drug Discontinuation Among Elderly Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Treated With Different Direct Oral Anticoagulants.不同直接口服抗凝药物治疗的老年非瓣膜性心房颤动患者转换为另一种口服抗凝药物和停药情况。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2019 Jan-Dec;25:1076029619870249. doi: 10.1177/1076029619870249.
2
Comparison of Drug Switching and Discontinuation Rates in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the United States.美国使用直接口服抗凝剂治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的药物转换和停药率比较。
Adv Ther. 2019 Jan;36(1):162-174. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0840-8. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
3
Comparative clinical outcomes between direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin among elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the CMS medicare population.比较 CMS 医疗保险人群中老年非瓣膜性心房颤动患者使用直接口服抗凝剂与华法林的临床结局。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2019 Aug;48(2):240-249. doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-01838-5.
4
Comparison of effectiveness and safety of treatment with apixaban vs. other oral anticoagulants among elderly nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients.阿哌沙班与其他口服抗凝剂治疗老年非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的有效性和安全性比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Oct;33(10):1745-1754. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1334638. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
5
Direct Comparison of Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban for Effectiveness and Safety in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.达比加群、利伐沙班和阿哌沙班在非瓣膜性心房颤动中有效性和安全性的直接比较
Chest. 2016 Dec;150(6):1302-1312. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
6
Comparative effectiveness and safety of apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中阿哌沙班、达比加群和利伐沙班的疗效和安全性比较。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Oct 1;268:113-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.03.047. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
7
Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Frail Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.非瓣膜性心房颤动虚弱患者中阿哌沙班、达比加群和利伐沙班与华法林的有效性和安全性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Apr 13;7(8):e008643. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008643.
8
Direct comparative effectiveness and safety between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂在非瓣膜性心房颤动中预防卒中的直接比较有效性和安全性:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Feb;34(2):173-190. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0415-7. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
9
Oral anticoagulant persistence in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: A cohort study using primary care data in Germany.非瓣膜性心房颤动患者口服抗凝药的持续性:一项使用德国初级保健数据的队列研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 10;12(10):e0185642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185642. eCollection 2017.
10
Effectiveness and Safety of Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban Versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.达比加群、利伐沙班和阿哌沙班与华法林相比治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动的有效性和安全性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jun 13;5(6):e003725. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003725.

引用本文的文献

1
Delay and Pay? Healthcare Costs Associated with Late Oral Anti-coagulant Prescribing in People with Atrial Fibrillation.延迟并付费?心房颤动患者延迟口服抗凝药物治疗相关的医疗费用。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Nov;42(11):1241-1253. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01419-2. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
2
Oral anticoagulant switching in patients with atrial fibrillation: a scoping review.口服抗凝药物在心房颤动患者中的转换:一项范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 25;13(4):e071907. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071907.
3
Incidence and Predictors of Switching and Dose Change of Direct Oral Anticoagulants among Elderly Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A 5-Year Analysis of a Large Administrative Database.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Drug Switching and Discontinuation Rates in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the United States.美国使用直接口服抗凝剂治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的药物转换和停药率比较。
Adv Ther. 2019 Jan;36(1):162-174. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0840-8. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
2
Discontinuation risk comparison among 'real-world' newly anticoagulated atrial fibrillation patients: Apixaban, warfarin, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban.真实世界中新抗凝治疗的心房颤动患者停药风险比较:阿哌沙班、华法林、达比加群或利伐沙班。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 30;13(4):e0195950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195950. eCollection 2018.
3
老年非瓣膜性心房颤动患者直接口服抗凝剂换药及剂量变化的发生率和预测因素:一项对大型管理数据库的5年分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 19;12(6):2379. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062379.
4
Drug Utilization Pattern of Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Population-Based Study in Korea.口服抗凝药物在心房颤动患者中的用药模式:韩国全国范围内基于人群的研究。
Adv Ther. 2022 Jul;39(7):3112-3130. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02151-z. Epub 2022 May 7.
5
Updating the Cost Effectiveness of Oral Anticoagulants for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Based on Varying Stroke and Bleed Risk Profiles.基于不同卒中风险和出血风险概况更新口服抗凝药物在房颤患者中的成本效益。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Dec;38(12):1333-1343. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00960-0. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
Adherence and outcomes to direct oral anticoagulants among patients with atrial fibrillation: findings from the veterans health administration.
心房颤动患者使用直接口服抗凝剂的依从性及治疗结果:退伍军人健康管理局的研究发现
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Sep 2;17(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0671-6.
4
Adherence to Rivaroxaban, Dabigatran, and Apixaban for Stroke Prevention for Newly Diagnosed and Treatment-Naive Atrial Fibrillation Patients: An Update Using 2013-2014 Data.新诊断且未经治疗的房颤患者使用利伐沙班、达比加群和阿哌沙班预防卒中的依从性:基于 2013-2014 年数据的更新。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Sep;23(9):958-967. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.9.958.
5
Adherence to Rivaroxaban Compared with Other Oral Anticoagulant Agents Among Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中利伐沙班与其他口服抗凝药物的依从性比较。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Sep;23(9):980-988. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.9.980.
6
Major Bleeding Risk During Anticoagulation with Warfarin, Dabigatran, Apixaban, or Rivaroxaban in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.非瓣膜性心房颤动患者华法林、达比加群、阿哌沙班或利伐沙班抗凝治疗的大出血风险。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Sep;23(9):968-978. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.9.968.
7
Comparison of effectiveness and safety of treatment with apixaban vs. other oral anticoagulants among elderly nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients.阿哌沙班与其他口服抗凝剂治疗老年非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的有效性和安全性比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Oct;33(10):1745-1754. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1334638. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
8
Real-World Setting Comparison of Nonvitamin-K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin-K Antagonists for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.真实世界环境中比较非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝药与维生素 K 拮抗剂预防心房颤动卒中:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2017 Sep;48(9):2494-2503. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017549. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
9
Major bleeding risk and healthcare economic outcomes of non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients newly-initiated with oral anticoagulant therapy in the real-world setting.真实世界中开始接受口服抗凝治疗的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的大出血风险及医疗保健经济结果。
J Med Econ. 2017 Sep;20(9):952-961. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1341902. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
10
Influence of Direct Oral Anticoagulants on Rates of Oral Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation.直接口服抗凝药对房颤患者口服抗凝治疗率的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 May 23;69(20):2475-2484. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.540.